영문목차
Title page=0,1,3
Abstract=i,4,3
TABLE OF CONTENTS=iv,7,3
LIST OF TABLES=vii,10,1
LIST OF FIGURES=viii,11,2
I. Introduction=1,13,3
II. Overview of Business Process Management=4,16,2
2.1 BPM Market Trend=6,18,2
2.2 BPM Core Technology=8,20,1
2.2.1 Workflow Management=8,20,1
2.2.2 Enterprise Application Integration=9,21,2
2.2.3 E-Business Technology=11,23,2
2.3 BPM Standardization=13,25,1
2.3.1 Workflow Standards=13,25,4
2.3.2 Web Service Standards=17,29,2
2.3.3 Process Definition Language Standards=18,30,3
III. Business-to-Business Workflow Integration=21,33,2
3.1 Inter-Organizational Workflow=23,35,3
3.2 Building Blocks for B2B Workflow Integration=26,38,1
3.2.1 Three Interfaces for Workflow Integration=26,38,2
3.2.2 B2B Workflow Reference Model=28,40,2
3.2.3 Requirements for Workflow Integration Systems=29,41,2
3.3 B2B Workflow Integration Approaches=31,43,1
3.3.1 Workflow Systems Interoperability=31,43,2
3.3.2 Web Service Choregraphy=33,45,2
3.3.3 Multi-Phase Process Composition=34,46,3
3.4 Discussion=37,49,1
IV. Business Process Choreography=38,50,2
4.1 Collaborative Business Processes=40,52,3
4.2 Process Interoperability Pattern=43,55,1
4.2.1 Primitive Patterns=43,55,3
4.2.2 Expression of Patterns=45,57,5
4.3 Business Process Choreography=50,62,4
4.4 Business Process Decomposition=54,66,5
4.5 System Implementation=59,71,4
4.6 Discussion=63,75,1
V. Workflow Clustering=64,76,4
5.1 Graph Similarity and Document Clustering=68,80,2
5.2 Workflow Clustering=70,82,1
5.2.1 Workflow Recommendation=70,82,2
5.2.2 Workflow Process Similarity=71,83,3
5.3 Processes Similarity=74,86,2
5.3.1 Activity Similarity Measure=76,88,1
5.3.2 Transition Similarity Measure=77,89,1
5.3.3 Transition Similarity Measure in wCDG=78,90,3
5.4 Two-Phase Workflow Clustering Model=81,93,2
5.4.1 Metrical Clustering Approach=82,94,3
5.4.2 Categorical Approach to Workflow Clustering=85,97,3
5.5 Applications of Workflow Clustering=88,100,2
5.5.1 Process Query Processing=89,101,2
5.5.2 Process Pattern Extraction=90,102,2
5.6 Experimental Results=92,104,1
5.6.1 Clustering Varying the Numbers of Processes and Clusters=93,105,2
5.6.2 Clustering Varying the Sizes of Processes and Activity Space=94,106,3
5.6.3 Clustering in Different Activity Birth Rates=96,108,2
5.6.4 Clustering Adapting the tf-idf concept=98,110,2
5.7 Discussion=100,112,1
VI. Conclusions and Future Work=101,113,2
BIBLIOGRAPHY=103,115,6
[abstract in Korean]=109,121,3
[acknowledgment]=112,124,1
Table II-1. Workflow life cycle and research issues=8,20,1
Table II-2. Workflow standard documentation by WfMC=14,26,1
Table II-3. Five interface of WfMC Workflow Reference Model=16,28,1
Table II-4. Web Service standardization=18,30,1
Table II-5. Comparison of process definition language standards=19,31,1
Table III-1. Standards for business process modeling(revised from ebpml.org)=24,36,1
Table III-2. Interfaces for workflow integration=27,39,1
Table IV-1. Process interoperability operations=47,59,1
Table IV-2. Expressions of primitive interoperability patterns=49,61,1
Table V-1. Two types of similarity in workflow process=72,84,1
Table V-2. Experimental results of workflow clustering varying N and K=93,105,1
Table V-3. Experimental results of workflow clustering varying M and A=95,107,1
Table V-4. Experimental results of workflow clustering in different activity birth rates=97,109,1
Table V-5. Experimental results of workflow clustering adapting the tf-idf concept=98,110,1
Figure II-1. Positioning of BPM technology[revised from CSC]=5,17,1
Figure II-2. Classification of EAI frameworks[Mann,1999]=10,22,1
Figure II-3. Business process models of e-Business standards, ebXML and RosettaNet=11,23,1
Figure II-4. WfMC Workflow Reference Model Dagram[WfMC,1999b]=15,27,1
Figure III-1. B2B Workflow Reference Model=28,40,1
Figure III-2. Workflow Systems Interperability with Wf-XML binding=32,44,1
Figure III-3. Web Service Choreography with UDDI registry=33,45,1
Figure III-4. Conceptual scenario of Multi-phase Process Composition=35,47,1
Figure III-5. Multi-Phase Process Composition approach with BPM standards=36,48,1
Figure III-6. Multi-Phase Process Composition approach with ebXML framework=36,48,1
Figure IV-1. Collaboration scenarios=41,53,1
Figure IV-2. Primitive interoperability patterns between two processes=45,57,1
Figure IV-3. Hybrid interoperability patterns between two process=49,61,1
Figure IV-4. Example purchasing process=51,63,1
Figure IV-5. Interface protocol design for a purchasing process=52,64,1
Figure IV-6. Example of process decomposition=56,68,1
Figure IV-7. Gene identification in DNA sequences=58,70,1
Figure IV-8. Distnibuted workflow composition and choreography=58,70,1
Figure IV-9. Business process choreography system architecture=59,71,1
Figure IV-10. XML OB Query and XML Binding with Java=60,72,1
Figure IV-11. Business process choreography system modules' operation sequence=61,73,1
Figure IV-12. User interface of the prototype system=62,74,1
Figure V-1. Architecture of workflow recommendation=70,82,1
Figure V-2. Examples of workflow processes in directed graph design=74,86,1
Figure V-3. Weighted complete dependency graph (wCDG)=78,90,1
Figure V-4. Transition similarity in wCDG's with inferential transitions=79,91,1
Figure V-5. Two-Phase workflow clustering=82,94,1
Figure V-6. K-means algorithm in workflow clustering=84,96,1
Figure V-7. AHC algorithm in workflow clustering=84,96,1
Figure V-8. ROCK algorithm in workflow clustering=86,98,1
Figure V-9. Process accumulated graph and its weighted adjacency matrix=89,101,1
Figure V-10. Process accumulated graph and its weighted adjacency matrix=90,102,1
Figure V-11. Example of process pattern extraction=91,103,1
Figure V-12. A synthetic workflow process and its encoding=92,104,1
Figure V-13. Mean similarity of workflow clusters varying N and K=94,106,1
Figure V-14. Mean similarity of workflow clusters varying M and A=95,107,1
Figure V-15. Mean similarity of workflow clusters in different activity birth rates=97,109,1
Figure V-16. Mean similarity of workflow clusters adapting the tf-idf concept=99,111,1