We can recognize that the claim of rapid judgment is difficult to include or insist on the right of summary trial directly from a formal standpoint. Because at least looking over the present statute, the claim of judgment in a narrow sense namely prosecution is allowed not to suspect who will be the accused but to prosecutor and chief of police station. In the same context, it is not allowed legally that suspect claims rapid release from criminal procedure like suspension of prosecution by prosecutor or release by chief of police station as a right.
However what was tried to discuss in this paper is that national organs in charge must apply the related legislation making the most of lawmaking intention in each statute for the realization of claim of rapid judgement on the constitution. Those efforts are substantial and needed for the realization of human rights.
From this context, present summary trial is defined as a useful institution that can realize the claim of rapid judgement of suspect substantially. The most important reason among the examined above is that suspect accepts the summary trial as a amicable dealing on the dimension of rapid release from the criminal procedure in the crime which could be dealed with by a summary trial according to cases. Moreover, rapid return to the society is very important in the point of prevention against another crime caused by brand.
So then, we should review the conclusion of the reform commission for judicial procedure that will abolish the summary trial in spite of a lot of usefulness in criminal policy for the legal dogma of exclusive prosecution by prosecutor and for the making appearance of integration of rapid system in criminal procedure from the dimension of fundamental right of suspect.
Concrete motion about abolition of related legislation is not proceeding yet. The important thing on this time is steady application and practicing of present law. Police should recognize the exact scope of summary trial anew which has been regarded as a finishing system against the outrage of Punishment of Minor Offenses Act or Road Traffic Act and should make efficient use of it on the dimension of fundamental right of constitution. Then we should make a effort to reflect the citizen's reaction about that to reforming plan of judicial procedure in the future. This means the order, " Be the agonizing police for the people out of the routine and expedient behavior of work".