Nowadays, it is very frequently happen that the claim is not realized its perform with infringement or it is get in the way by the third person because the scope of transaction is enlarged day by day and diversified the types of transactions in the economic life.
This is the issue of claim infringement by the third person. The claim infringement by the third person was introduced firstly in the United Kingdom case, and the issue of this legal agenda discussed when Germany, French, Japan Civil Code enacted but legislature was failed. This issue is directly included in the second Restatement of Torts law in United States even she lately treated this question. The claim infringement by the third person is not substantive enactment in the specific act but individual jurisdiction court case and academic theory coincidently accepted the issues.
In addition, claim infringement by the third person may possible with negligence; however it was only approved with intent in the past. Furthermore, many states have researched the types of claim infringement. The claim infringement currently firmly fixed with recognized in the academic dogma and court decision in this way and the protection area of claim is expanded step by step. Besides, the claim is included by regarding it as an important damage as we see and revised draft of French Civil Code, principle of EU torts law and principle of EU indemnification for damage, revised draft of Japanese Civil Code are included in the statutes to meet the global standard.
Currently, Korean government under revising the Civil Code, I would suggest the claim infringement by the third person should be incorporated in the statute to satisfied the international standard and dogma and precedent are agreed the principle may applied the case in the subject matter. Therefore this piece may contribute on that point exactly and can be a good literature.