Artificial intelligence is expected to make qualitative and quantitative progress that cannot be compared to conventional human capabilities in detecting the possibility of legal disputes in advance, blocking or minimizing legal risks, and deriving optimal post-conflict solutions in case of disputes.
However, it does not appear that the search for solutions or alternatives to capture legal issues to support these technological advances is unfolding at a similar rate.
The languages of existing laws and rulings are acting as obstacles beyond the difficulty of artificial intelligence technology in terms of natural language processing. If the use and graft of artificial intelligence are unavoidable in the future, the appropriate alternatives should be specifically sought.
This article aims to examine the current status and status of legislation in response to the development of AI technology from a critical perspective, and to find ways to respond to legislation, authoritative interpretation, administrative judgments, and court rulings that match the trend of technology development.
To this end, we looked at the status of meaningful artificial intelligence-related information and development from a legal perspective, analyzed the status and cause of the inconsistency between artificial intelligence technology, legislation, and rulings, and discussed alternatives to overcome them.