목차
[표제지 등]=0,1,2
연구보고서=0,3,1
목차=i,4,2
Contents=iii,6,2
List Of Figures=v,8,12
List Of Tables=xvii,20,2
요약문=xix,22,6
Summary=xxv,28,6
제1장 서론=1,34,1
제1절 연구의 배경 및 국제동향=1,34,7
제2절 연구의 필요성=8,41,4
제2장 2005년 ARGO 플로트 현장관측=12,45,1
제1절 동해 현장 관측=12,45,3
제2절 북서태평양 현장 관측=15,48,5
제3장 ARGO 자료 실시간 품질 관리 시스템 운영 기술=20,53,1
제1절 서론=20,53,1
제2절 ARGO 자료 수집 체계=20,53,2
제3절 ARGO 원시 자료 형식 및 해석=22,55,4
제4절 실시간 품질관리(Real Time Quality Control) 알고리즘=25,58,4
제5절 자료변환 및 분배 체계=28,61,10
제6절 결론=38,71,2
제4장 해양 대순환 모델 연구=40,73,1
제1절 모델 개요=40,73,1
제2절 ARGO 자료를 활용한 모델 검증=41,74,3
제3절 모델로 모사된 기후 평균장=43,76,11
제5장 ARGO 자료 처리 기법 개발 연구=53,86,1
제1절 보정된 ARGO 자료의 검증=54,87,13
제2절 기상연구소 ARGO 자료의 QuaIity Control=66,99,4
제3절 태풍 영향에 의한 해양 반응 분석(위도별 반응연구)=70,103,12
제4절 인공위성 SST와 ARGO 플로트로부터 얻은 혼합층 수온 비교 연구=81,114,10
제5절 결론 및 요약=90,123,4
제6장 고해상도 전구 해양 대순환 모델에 대한 자료동화 적용=94,127,1
제1절 서언=94,127,2
제2절 고해상도 전구 해양 대순환 모델에 대한 자료동화 알고리즘 개발=95,128,15
제3절 고해상도 모델에 대한 자료동화의 품위 검증 및 분석=109,142,59
제4절 종관규모 해양모델에 대한 경계 및 초기자료 제공=168,201,18
제5절 접합대순환 모델을 이용한 해양 자료동화 Impact 실험=186,219,12
제6절 결론 및 요약=198,231,2
제7장 종관규모 3차원 해양 순환 모델 개선=200,233,1
제1절 서언=200,233,1
제2절 조석을 고려한 3차원 해양 순환 모델 실험=200,233,13
제3절 전구 모델 결과 적용 기법 개발=213,246,23
제4절 한반도 주변 해역 수온의 연 변화=236,269,1
제8장 요약 및 향후 계획=237,270,1
제1절 요약=237,270,3
제2절 향후 계획=239,272,2
제9장 참고문헌=241,274,6
Fig. 1.1. Spatial Distribution Of ARGO Floats Operating In Jan. 2006. Information Is Obtained From The AIC And METRI/ARGO Home Page=2,35,1
Fig. 1.2. Depth Of 20℃ Isotherm (Upper Panel) And Its Anomaly (Lower) In Jun. 2005 Analyzed By BMRC=3,36,1
Fig. 1.3. SST Anomaly (6 Day Composite), Sea Level And Geostrophic Velocity In 10. Jun. 2005 Analyzed By BMRC=3,36,1
Fig. 1.4. Mercator High Resolution (1/15℃) Salinity Atlantic MedForecast At 1000 M=4,37,1
Fig. 1.5. Global Salinity At 1000 m=5,38,1
Fig. 1.6. Ocean Circulation Model In North Pacific Operated By JMA=5,38,1
Fig. 1.7. Ocean Circulation Model Around Japan Operated By JMA=6,39,1
Fig. 1.8. Horizontal Distribution Of Salinity At 1000 M Depth In Mid June 2005 Provided From FOAM=6,39,1
Fig. 2.1. Deployment Position Of Five East Sea Floats=14,47,1
Fig. 2.2. Trajectories Of ARGO Floats Deployed By METRI In 2005 Year=14,47,1
Fig. 2.3. Deployment Position Of 10 Northwestern Pacific Floats=17,50,1
Fig. 2.4. Trajectories Of ARGO Floats Deployed By METRI In 2005 Year=18,51,1
Fig. 2.5. Deployment ARGO Floats On VOS In 2005 Year=19,52,1
Fig. 3.1. Schematic Diagram Measuring Argos Locations By Doppler Shift=21,54,1
Fig. 3.2. Web Monitoring System Of Real Time Quality Control System For ARGO Data=37,70,1
Fig. 3.3. Flow Chart Of QC And Web System For ARGO Data=39,72,1
Fig. 4.1. Distribution Maps Of ARGO Floats In The February (Left) And August (Right) 2003=41,74,1
Fig. 4.2. T-S Diagram In 10ㄷby 10℃ grid In The February 2003. Red Points Are Model Results And Blue Points Are ARGO Data=42,75,1
Fig. 4.3. T-S Diagram In 10℃ by 10℃ Grid In The August 2003. Red Points Are Model Results And Blue Points Are ARGO Data=42,75,1
Fig. 4.4. Annual Mean Sea Surface Temperature In 2004 Year (MOM3). Unit Is Deg. C=44,77,1
Fig. 4.5. Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly Of Annual Mean In 2004 Year Between MOM3 And Levitus 94. Unit Is Deg. C=44,77,1
Fig. 4.6. Annual Mean Sea Surface Salinity In 2004 Year (MOM3)=45,78,1
Fig. 4.7. Sea Surface Salinity Anomaly Of Annual Mean In 2004 Year Between MOM3 And Levitus 94=45,78,1
Fig. 4.8. Annual Mean Sea Surface Hight In 2004 Year (MOM3). Unit Is Cm=46,79,1
Fig. 4.9. Mean Sea Surface Height Of GOADS, Simulation For 1992-2003=46,79,1
Fig. 4.10. Annual Mean Sea Surface Velocity Field In 2004 Year (MOM3)=48,81,1
Fig. 4.11. Annual Mean Volume Transport Streamfunction In 2004 Year (MOM3)=48,81,1
Fig. 4.12. Mean Distributions Of The Simulated Equatorial Current Systems In February(Left) And August(Right)=48,81,1
Fig. 4.13. Monthly Mean Sea Surface Temperature In 2004 Year=49,82,1
Fig. 4.14. Monthly Mean Sea Surface Salinity In 2004 Year=50,83,1
Fig. 4.15. Monthly Mean Sea Surface Height In 2004 Year=51,84,1
Fig. 4.16. Monthl Y Mean Sea Surface Velocity In 2004 Year=52,85,1
Fig. 4.17. Monthly Mean Volume Transport Stream Function From In 2004 Year=53,86,1
Fig. 5.1. Temperature (a) And Salinity Profiles (b) Averaged Within 145 - 160°E And 35 - 45°N In The North Pacific (Red) And 127 - 142°E 35 - 45°E In The East/Japan Sea (Blue). The Broken Lines Present The Standard Deviations Of The Temperature And The Salinity Profiles=55,88,1
Fig. 5.2. Station Map Of T/S Profiles Obtained From The Profiling Floats=56,89,1
Fig. 5.3. High Resolution CTD Stations From CREAMS Experiment. (a) Data Used For Salinity Calibration From July 1993 To March 1999. (b) Data Used For Validation From July 1999 To April 2004=57,90,1
Fig. 5.4. Mean Salinities And Their Standard Deviation At 800 m Which Calculated From CREAMS CTD Data (July 1993-March 1999) In Each Basin=59,92,1
Fig. 5.5. Effects Of Spike Data On Salinity Calibration By Wong'S Method=61,94,1
Fig. 5.6. Effect Of Rapid Salinity Change On The Offset Calibration=62,95,1
Fig. 5.7. Self Comparison Of Argo Float Salinity Within The Window Of 10days And 20km=63,96,1
Fig. 5.8. Direct Comparison With High Resolution CTD Measurement=64,97,1
Fig. 5.9. Histogram Of Salinity Deviation (Scalibrate-SCTD)=66,99,1
Fig. 5.10. Results Of Quality Controlled Argo Temperature And Salinity Data In The North Pacific=67,100,1
Fig. 5.11. Station Map Of ARGO Floats Deployed By METRI In The East Sea (Left) And In The North Pacific (Right)=68,101,1
Fig. 5.12. Temperature-Salinity Diagram After ARGO Floats Deployed By METRI In The East Sea (Left) And In The North Pacific (Right)=69,102,1
Fig. 5.13. Distribution Of Typhoons And Tropical Storms=71,104,1
Fig. 5.14. Location Of Profile Pairs Corresponding To Typhoon Tracks=72,105,1
Fig. 5.15. Histogram Of Difference Of Temperature In The Mixed Layer (a) And Difference Of The Mixed Layer Depth (Bs) In The North Pacific (AFTER BEFORE). Open Boxes Denote Histogram Of Differences Of MLT And MLD Regardless Of Typhoon Events=74,107,1
Fig. 5.16. Relation Between MLT And MLD Change (a) And Dependency Of MLD Change On Ocean Status Before A Typhoon Comes=75,108,1
Fig. 5.17. Zonal Averaged MLT (a) And MLD (b) Change During Typhoon Event. Error Bars Present Standard Deviation In Each 5o Band=76,109,1
Fig. 5.18. (a) Zonal Averaged Translation Speed (Red) And Maximum Wind Gust (Blue). Error Bar Shows One Standard Deviation In Each 5˚ band. Zonally Averaged MLD From All Float Data Assembled Within 115ㄷE - 180ㄷ E In Summertime (Jun. - Oct.) (Black). Error Bar Presents One Standard Deviation Divided Byv�n (N: Number Of Data). (b) Zonal Averaged MLT Difference (Red) And MLD Difference (Blue) Obtained From Profile Pairs With Non-Typhoon Event=78,111,1
Fig. 5.19. Changes In The SSTs Before And After The Typhoon As A Function Of Distance From The Center Of The Typhoon. Colors Represent Latitudes=80,113,1
Fig. 5.20. Comparison Between Changes Of The ARGO/MLT And AMSR E/SST Before And After The Typhoon. Matchup Points Are Classified Into The Ascending Pass (Circle) And Descending Pass (Triangle). Colors Represent Latitudes=81,114,1
Fig. 5.21. The Vertical Profile Of SST According To Day And Night=82,115,1
Fig. 5.22. Distribution Of Matchup Points (Total Numbers: 3118) Between AGRO/MLT And AMSR E/SST In The Pacific For The Period Of June, 2002 To December, 2004=83,116,1
Fig. 5.23. Comparison Between ARGO/MLT And AMSR E/SST=84,117,1
Fig. 5.24. Distribution Of The SST Error (AMSR_E/SST-ARGO/MLT) As A Function Of Latitude=86,119,1
Fig. 5.25. Distribution Of The SST Errors (AMSR_E/SST-ARGO/MLT) As A Function Of Wind Speed (m/s) For (a) Ascending Pass And (b) Descending Pass=87,120,1
Fig. 5.26. Distribution Of The SST Errors (AMSR_E/SST-ARGO/MLT) As A Function Of Winds According To The Season. Colors Represent Latitudes=89,122,1
Fig. 5.27. Distribution Of The SST Errors (AMSR_E/SST-ARGO/MLT) According To The Amount Of Columnar Water Vapor In The Atmosphere=92,125,1
Fig. 6.1. A Schematic Diagram Of Ocean Data Assimilation System=97,130,1
Fig. 6.2. A Schematic Diagram Of Experiment Procedure=98,131,1
Fig. 6.3. Schematic Diagram Of The Vertical Structure Of Low Resolution OGCM=101,134,1
Fig. 6.4. Schematic Diagram Of The Vertical Structure Of High Resolution OGCM=102,135,1
Fig. 6.5. Global ARGO Data Distribution Between 01 December 2003 And 31 December 2004 (http://www.coriolis.eu.org/cdc)=108,141,1
Fig. 6.6. Moored Buoys Distribution Of The TOGA Tropical Atmosphere - Ocean(TAO) Array (http://www.coriolis.eu.org/cdc)=108,141,1
Fig. 6.7. Global XBT Data Distribution Between 01 Becember 2003 And 31 December 2004 (Http //Www.Coriolis.Eu.Org/Cdc)=109,142,1
Fig. 6.8. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SST For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Background, (c) Low Resolution Analysis, (D) High Resolution Analysis=111,144,1
Fig. 6.9. A Comparison Of Depth-Latitude Section Of Annual Mean Temperature Taken At 140°W For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Low Resolution Analysis, (D) High Resolution Analysis=112,145,1
Fig. 6.10. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SSS For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Low Resolution Analysis, (D) High Resolution Analysis=114,147,1
Fig. 6.11. A Comparison Of Depth-Latitude Section Of Annual Mean Salinity Taken At 140°W For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Low Resolution Analysis, (D) High Resolution Analysis=115,148,1
Fig. 6.12. Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SST Differences Between (a) Background, (b) Analysis Sea Surface Temperature And The Observation (OISST) For The Uppermost Layer=117,150,1
Fig. 6.13. A Comparison Of Depth-Longitude Section Of Annual Mean Temperature Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=118,151,1
Fig. 6.14. A Comparison Of Depth-Longitude Section Of Annual Mean Temperature Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference=119,152,1
Fig. 6.15. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SST For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 12.5 M=121,154,1
Fig. 6.16. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SST For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 62.5 M=122,155,1
Fig. 6.17. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SST For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 112.5 M=123,156,1
Fig. 6.18. A Comparison Of Depth-Longitude Section Of Annual Mean Salinity Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=124,157,1
Fig. 6.19. A Comparison Of Depth-Longitude Section Of Annual Mean Salinity Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference=125,158,1
Fig. 6.20. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SSS For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 12.5 M=127,160,1
Fig. 6.21. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SSS For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 62.5 M=128,161,1
Fig. 6.22. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean SSS For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 112.5 M=129,162,1
Fig. 6.23. A Comparison Of Depth-Longitude Section Of Annual Mean Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference=130,163,1
Fig. 6.24. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Annual Mean Zonal Current Taken At 140°W For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference=131,164,1
Fig. 6.25. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean Zonal Current For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 12.5 M=132,165,1
Fig. 6.26. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean Zonal Current For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 62.5 M=133,166,1
Fig. 6.27. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean Zonal Current For (a) Analysis, (b) Background, (c) The Difference At The Depth Of 112.5 M=134,167,1
Fig. 6.28. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (JAN-MAR) SST For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=137,170,1
Fig. 6.29. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (APR-JUN) SST For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=138,171,1
Fig. 6.30. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (JUL-SEP) SST For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=139,172,1
Fig. 6.31. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (OCT-DEC) SST For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=140,173,1
Fig. 6.32. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (JAN-MAR) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=141,174,1
Fig. 6.33. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (APR-JUN) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=142,175,1
Fig. 6.34. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (JUL-SEP) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=143,176,1
Fig. 6.35. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (OCT-DEC) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=144,177,1
Fig. 6.36. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (JAN-MAR) Temperature Taken At 160° For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=145,178,1
Fig. 6.37. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (APR-JUN) Temperature Taken At 160° For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=146,179,1
Fig. 6.38. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (JUL-SEP) Temperature Taken At 160°E For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=147,180,1
Fig. 6.39. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (OCT-DEC) Ternperature Taken At 160°E For (a) Observation (Leetma), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=148,181,1
Fig. 6.40. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (JAN-FEB) SSS For (a) Observation (Levitus), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=152,185,1
Fig. 6.41. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (APR-MAY) SSS For (a) Observation (Levitus), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=153,186,1
Fig. 6.42. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (JUL-AUG) SSS For (a) Observation (Levitus), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=154,187,1
Fig. 6.43. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Time Mean (OCT-NOV) SSS For (a) Observation (Levitus), (b) Background, (c) Analysis=155,188,1
Fig. 6A4. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (JAN-MAR) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=156,189,1
Fig. 6.45. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (APR-JUN) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=157,190,1
Fig. 6.46. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (JUL-SEP) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=158,191,1
Fig. 6.47. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Time Mean (OCT-DEC) Zonal Current Taken At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=159,192,1
Fig. 6.48. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (JAN-MAR) Zonal Current Taken At 140°W For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=160,193,1
Fig. 6.49. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (APR-JUN) Zonal Current Taken At 140°W For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=161,194,1
Fig. 6.50. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (JUL-SEP) Zonal Current Taken At 140°W For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=162,195,1
Fig. 6.51. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of Time Mean (OCT-DEC) Zonal Current Taken At 140°W For (a) Background, (b) Analysis=163,196,1
Fig. 6.52. A Time-Longitude Plot Of Monthly Average Temperature At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation, (b) Background, (c) Analysis=165,198,1
Fig. 6.53. A Time-Latitude Plot Of Monthly Average Temperature At 145°W For (a) Observation, (b) Background, (c) Analysis=166,199,1
Fig. 6.54. A Time-Longitude Plot Of Monthly Average Salinity At Equatorial In The Pacific For (a) Observation, (b) Background, (c) Analysis=167,200,1
Fig. 6.55. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean Temperature For (a) Observation (OISST), (b) Analysis=169,202,1
Fig. 6.56. A Comparison Of Horizontal Distribution Of Annual Mean Salinity For (a) Observation, (b) Analysis=170,203,1
Fig. 6.57. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of (a) Temperature, (b) Salinity, (c) Meridional Current Taken At 15°N=171,204,1
Fig. 6.58. A Comparison Of A Depth-Latitude Section Of (a) Temperature, (b) Salinity, (c) Zonal Current Taken At 160°E=173,206,1
Fig. 6.59. Surface Temperature By OBS (OISST) In Each Month=175,208,1
Fig. 6.60. Surface Temperature By Analysis In Each Month=176,209,1
Fig. 6.61. A Depth-Longitude Section Of Temperature By OBS (Levitus) Taken At 15°N In Each Month=177,210,1
Fig. 6.62. A Depth-Longitude Section Of Temperature By Analysis Taken At 15°N In Eaeh Month=178,211,1
Fig. 6.63. A Depth-Latitude Section Of Temperature By OBS (Levitus) Taken At 160°E In Each Month=179,212,1
Fig. 6.64. A Depth ?Latitude Section Of Temperature By Analysis Taken At 160°E In Each Month=180,213,1
Fig. 6.65. A Depth-Longitude Section Of Salinity By OBS (Levitus) Taken At 15°N In Each Month=181,214,1
Fig. 6.66. A Depth-Longitude Section Of Salinity By Analysis Taken At 15°N In Each Month=182,215,1
Fig. 6.67. A Depth-Longitude Section Of Meridional Current By Analysis Taken At 15°N In Each Month=184,217,1
Fig. 6.68. A Depth-Latitude Section Of Zonal Current By Analysis Taken At 160°E In Each Month=185,218,1
Fig. 6.69. Monthly Mean December 2004 2 M Temperature From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition=188,221,1
Fig. 6.70. Monthly Mean January 2005 2 M Temperature From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition=189,222,1
Fig. 6.71. Monthly Mean February 2005 2 M Temperature From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition=190,223,1
Fig. 6.72. Monthly Mean December 2004 2 M Temperature Difference Between (a) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (b) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition And Observation=191,224,1
Fig. 6.73. Monthly Mean January 2005 2 M Temperature Difference Between (a) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (b) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition And Observation=192,225,1
Fig. 6.74. Monthly Mean February 2005 2 M Temperature Difference Between (a) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (b) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition And Observation=193,226,1
Fig. 6.75. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Monthly Mean December 2004 Salinity From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition Taken At 15°=195,228,1
Fig. 6.76. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Monthly Mean January 2005 Salinity From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assirrulated Initial Condition Taken At 15°=196,229,1
Fig. 6.77. A Comparison Of A Depth-Longitude Section Of Monthly Mean February 2005 Salinity From (a) Observation, (b) CGCM Results Without Assimilated Initial Condition, (c) CGCM Results With Assimilated Initial Condition Taken At 15°=197,230,1
Fig. 7.1. Tidal Chart Of The M2 Constituent (Left Is Phase (Rn), Right Is Amplitude (Cm))=202,235,1
Fig. 7.2. Bottom Topography Of Model Area. Numbers Indicate Water Depth=203,236,1
Fig. 7.3. Tidal Ellipse And Amplitude Of Major Tides (M2, S2, Ol, Kl) In Northwestern Pacific=205,238,1
Fig. 7.4. Tidal Ellipse And Amplitude Of Major Tides (M2, S2, Ol, Kl) In The Yellow Sea=206,239,1
Fig. 7.5. Surface Temperature And Currents Calculated By Model Without Tide (Left) And With Tide (Right) In February And May=207,240,1
Fig. 7.6. Surface Temperature And Currents Calculated By Model Without Tide (Left) And With Tide (Right) In August And November=208,241,1
Fig. 7.7. Surface Temperature Changes Of Model Result With Tide In The Yellow Sea And The East China Sea In February, May, August And November. Negative Means Temperature Decrease By Including Tide In The Model=210,243,1
Fig. 7.8. Comparison Of Horizontally Mean Sea Surface Temperature Between Model Results (With Tide And Without Tide) And Observed Historical Data In The Yellow Sea In Each Month=211,244,1
Fig. 7.9. Comparison Of Vertical Rofil E Comparison Among JODC D Model Results=212,245,1
Fig. 7.10. ARGO Floats In North Pacific=213,246,1
Fig. 7.11. A Schematic Diagram For Application Technique Of Global Ocean Mode L Result=214,247,1
Fig. 7.12. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1993=215,248,1
Fig. 7.13. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1994=216,249,1
Fig. 7.14. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1995=217,250,1
Fig. 7.15. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1996=218,251,1
Fig. 7.16. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1997=219,252,1
Fig. 7.17. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1998=220,253,1
Fig. 7.18. Wind Vector Used For Model In 1999=221,254,1
Fig. 7.19. Wind Vector Used For Model In 2000=222,255,1
Fig. 7.20. Wind Vector Used For Model In 2001=223,256,1
Fig. 7.21. Wind Vector Used For Model In 2002=224,257,1
Fig. 7.22. Discharge Of Yangze River From 1993 To 2002 (Yang, 2006)=224,257,1
Fig. 7.23. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1993=226,259,1
Fig. 7.24. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1994=227,260,1
Fig. 7.25. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1995=228,261,1
Fig. 7.26. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1996=229,262,1
Fig. 7.27. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1997=230,263,1
Fig. 7.28. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1998=231,264,1
Fig. 7.29. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 1999=232,265,1
Fig. 7.30. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 2000=233,266,1
Fig. 7.31. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 2001=234,267,1
Fig. 7.32. Surface Temperature (Left) And Salinity (Right) Calculated By Model In 2002=235,268,1
Fig. 7.33. Comparison Of Horizontally Mean Sea Surface Temperature Between Model Results With Tide (Solid Line) And Satellite Data (Filled Circle) In The Yellow Sea From January 1993 To December 2002=236,269,1
Fig. 8.1. Objective And Schematic Plan Of ARGO Project Carried By METRI/KMA=240,273,1
Table. 1.1. Summary The Uses That Are Presently Being Made Of ARGO Data By Operational Center=7,40,1
Table. 2.1. Field Map Including Deployment Position Of 2005-ARGO Floats At The East Sea=13,46,1
Table. 2.2. Field Map Including Deployment Position Of 2005-ARGO Floats At The Northwestern Pacific=16,49,1
Table. 3.1. The Accuracy Of Argos Locations (CLS, 1996)=21,54,1
Table. 3.2. Example Of Raw Data Of DS Type From ARGO Float=23,56,1
Table. 3.3. Description Of The Header Part On The Example In Table 3.2=23,56,1
Table. 3.4. Description Of Data Format For The Message Number 1 Only=24,57,1
Table. 3.5. Data Format For The Message Number 2 And Higher=24,57,1
Table. 3.6. Example Of The Convert Procedure From Hexadecimal To Decimal Numbers=25,58,1
Table. 3.7. Example Of TESAC Data Forrnat. File Name Is VOVB60_200512272110_2900526_015=30,63,1
Table. 5.1. Configuration Parameter For Wong'S DMQC=58,91,1
Table. 5.2. Coefficient For Quality Control Test In The Real Time Procedure=60,93,1
Table. 5.3. Self Consistency Of Salinity On 0.4°C Potential Temperature Surface=64,97,1
Table. 5.4. Tropical Storms And Typhoons Corresponding To Argo Profile Pairs=72,105,1
Table. 5.5. Comparison Of Temperatures Between ARGO And AMSR-E/SST=85,118,1
Table. 6.1. A Comparison Of Low Resolution And High Resolution OGCM=100,133,1