목차
[표제지 등]=0,1,2
연구보고서=0,3,1
목차=i,4,2
Contents=iii,6,2
List Of Figures=v,8,3
List Of Tables=viii,11,1
요약문=ix,12,1
Abstract=x,13,1
제1장 서론=1,14,3
제2장 지진정보 표준화 기반연구=4,17,1
2.1. 기상청 광대역 관측소 및 단주기 관측소의 배경잡음 특성=4,17,1
2.1.1. 서론=4,17,4
2.1.2. 배경잡음 자료 처리 방법=8,21,13
2.1.3. 결론 및 토의=21,34,2
2.2. 한ㆍ일 통합 지진관측망 구축=22,35,1
2.2.1. 서론=22,35,1
2.2.2. 일본방재과학기술연구소 관측망=22,35,4
2.2.3. 한 · 일 통합 지진관측망=26,39,8
2.2.4. 통합 지진관측망을 이용한 지진요소 결정=34,47,2
2.2.5. 결론 및 토의=36,49,1
2.3. 지진속보용 지진분석 프로그램 구축=36,49,1
2.3.1. 서론=36,49,1
2.3.2. 지진분석 알고리즘=36,49,2
2.3.3. 지진분석결과=38,51,1
2.3.4. 결론=39,52,1
2.4. 가속도 자료를 이용한 경험적 감쇄계수=39,52,1
2.4.1. 서론=39,52,2
2.4.2. 지진자료=40,53,7
2.4.3. 감쇄상수=46,59,4
제3장 한반도 역사지진 피해서술목록 작성 연구=50,63,1
3.1. 서론=50,63,1
3.1.1. 개요=50,63,2
3.1.2. 역사지진 피해서술 목록=51,64,1
3.1.3. 역사지진 규모 추정방법=51,64,1
3.2. 연구결과=51,64,1
3.2.1. 역사지진 피해서술 목록=51,64,3
3.2.2. 역사지진 규모 추정방법=53,66,8
3.3. 결론=60,73,1
참고문헌=61,74,4
부록=65,78,1
1. 주요 역사지진 발생 현황=65,78,31
Fig. 2.1-1. Background Noise Of HUK Station From The Earthquake Of Magnitude 2.4=5,18,1
Fig. 2.1-2. Broad-Band And Short-Period Seismic Stations Used In This Study=6,19,1
Fig. 2.1-3. Raw Data (A) And Bandpass Filtered (1Hz~25Hz) Data (B)=10,23,1
Fig. 2.1-4. Raw Background Noise And Its Envelope Curve. Average Plus For Amplitude Of Envelope Curve=10,23,1
Fig. 2.1-5. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For BRD Station=11,24,1
Fig. 2.1-6. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For BUS Station=11,24,1
Fig. 2.1-7. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For CHC Station=11,24,1
Fig. 2.1-8. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For CHJ Station=12,25,1
Fig. 2.1-9. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For DAG Station=12,25,1
Fig. 2.1-10. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For DGY Station=12,25,1
Fig. 2.1-11. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For JJU Station=13,26,1
Fig. 2.1-12. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For KWJ Station=13,26,1
Fig. 2.1-13. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For SEO Station=13,26,1
Fig. 2.1-14. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For SES Station=14,27,1
Fig. 2.1-15. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For ULJ Station=14,27,1
Fig. 2.1-16. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For ULL Station=14,27,1
Fig. 2.1-17. The Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For 12 Broadband Seismic Stations=15,28,1
Fig. 2.1-18. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For AND Station=16,29,1
Fig. 2.1-19. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For CHI Station=16,29,1
Fig. 2.1-20. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For CHO Station=16,29,1
Fig. 2.1-21. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For HUK Station=17,30,1
Fig. 2.1-22. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For ICN Station=17,30,1
Fig. 2.1-23. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For JEU Station=17,30,1
Fig. 2.1-24. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For MUS Station=18,31,1
Fig. 2.1-25. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For SGP Station=18,31,1
Fig. 2.1-26. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For SWO Station=18,31,1
Fig. 2.1-27. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For WAN Station=19,32,1
Fig. 2.1-28. Annual Change Of Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For WON Station=19,32,1
Fig. 2.1-29. Average Amplitude Of Background Noise Above 1Hz For 11 Short-Period Seismic Stations=20,33,1
Fig. 2.2-1. Schematic Structure Of High Precision Earthquake Observation Stations Within The Earth Crust (Deep Borehole Stations)=24,37,1
Fig. 2.2-2. Epicentral Distributions: The Upper Panel Is The Earthqpakes Observed By National Research Institute For Earth Science And Disaster Prevention (NIED) Operating HI-NET, And The Lower Panel Observed By JMA Durirg The Smm Period (About 10 Years)=25,38,1
Fig. 2.2-3. Seismic Stations In Korea And In The Southwestern Part Of Japan. All Data From These Stations As An Integrated Observation Network System Are Used In Earthquake Analysis In The Area Of The Korean Peninsula By KMA=27,40,1
Fig. 2.2-4. Schematic Diagram Of Data Flows Between The KMA Seismic Network And The NIED Seismic Network=28,41,1
Fig. 2.2-5. Flowchart Of The Orb2win Program To Convert The Antelope Packet To The WIN Format=31,44,1
Fig. 2.2-6. Flowchart Of The Win2orb Program To Convert The WIN Format To The Antelope Packet=32,45,1
Fig. 2.2-7. The System Is Display The Raw-Waveform Transmitted From NIED By Real-Time=33,46,1
Fig. 2.3-1. Flowchart Of The Program Of Early Warning System=37,50,1
Fig. 2.4-1. Map Of Used Earthquake Epicenters=41,54,1
Fig. 2.4-2. Distribution Of Seismic Station Used In This Work=42,55,1
Fig. 2.4-3. Diagram Of Event Nurnbers With Magnitude=46,59,1
Fig. 3.2-1. Epicenters Of Earthquakes Used In This Study=58,71,1
Fig. 3.2-2. Regression Relations Between Magnitudes And Felt Areas For Earthquakes In The Sino-Korean Craton, Northeastern North America, And Central United States And Northeastern North America. Open Circles Are The Data For The Sino-Korean Craton=59,72,1
Table 2.1-1. Informations Of Broad-Band And Short-Period Seismic Stations Used In This Study=7,20,1
Table 2.2-1. Data Packet Of PktChannel Of Antelope Used By KMA=30,43,1
Table 2.2-2. Data Format Of The WIN System Used By NIED=30,43,1
Table 2.2-3. Examples Of The Focal Parameter Determinations Using The integrated Observation Network System. The Results Using The Individual Networks Are Presented For Comparison Purpose=35,48,1
Table 2.3-1. Compared The Result From Early Warning System To The Report From KMA=38,51,1
Table 2.4-1. Earthquakes Catalogue Used In This Work=43,56,3
Table 3.2-1. Number Of Korean Historical Earthquakes Data Per Century=53,66,1
Table 3.2-2. Earthquakes In The Sino-Korean Craton Used In This Study=57,70,1