[Title Page]
Abbreviation
Contents
Executive Summary 13
I. Evaluation Overview 29
1. Background and Rationale of Evaluation 31
1) Background 31
2) Purpose of Evaluation 33
3) Key Evaluation Questions 35
2. Scope of Evaluation 36
1) Target of the Comprehensive Performance Analysis 38
2) Target Projects for the Evaluation(Indonesia and Mozambique) 42
3. Features of Evaluation 44
4. Expected Effect 45
II. Evaluation Design and Methodology 47
1. Evaluation Criteria 49
2. Evaluation Methodology 51
1) Desk Review 53
2) In-depth Interview / Focus Group Interview(FGI) 54
3) Survey 55
4) Cost-Effective Analysis 56
3. Evaluation Matrix 57
4. Composition of Evaluation Team 71
1) Evaluation Team 71
5. Evaluation Process 73
6. Limitations of Evaluation 74
1) Limitations of Evaluation 74
2) Modification made by Evaluation Team 74
III. Meta Evaluation of KOICA's Global CSR Program 77
1. Program Description 79
1) Program Objectives 79
2) Participating Organizations 79
3) The Budget Scale of Program 80
4) Sectoral, Regional, and National Distribution of Projects 82
2. Process Analysis 84
1) Alignment with ODA Policy 84
2) Implementation Structure Analysis 85
3) Program Efficiency Analysis 88
4) Project Development 100
5) Extension project from a new and existing project 103
3. Partnership Analysis 104
1) KOICA's Role as a Partner 104
2) Sustainability of Project Partnership 104
3) Efficiency of Project Partnership 105
4. Performance Analysis 108
1) Achievement of Program Objectives 108
2) Analysis of Program's Impact 115
5. Findings 127
1) Process Analysis 127
2) Partnership Analysis 130
3) Performance Analysis 131
IV. Case Studies on the Global CSR Projects in Indonesia and Mozambique 133
1. Vocational Training Project for the Vulnerable Youth in Cileungsi, Bogor, Indonesia 135
1) Project Overview 135
2) Process Evaluations 137
3) Result Evaluation 164
4) Partnership Evaluation 170
5) Conclusion 174
2. Poverty Eradication Project in Mozambique Manhica 188
1) Project Summary 188
2) Process Analysis 192
3) Evaluation of Partnership 215
4) Performance Analysis 218
5) Findings 222
V. Conclusions and Recommendations 235
1. Evaluation Results of the Key Questions 237
1) Achievement of Program Objectives 237
2) Sustainability of the Global CSR Program 239
3) Added Value of Partnership between CSO & Firms 239
2. Recommendations for the Program Improvement 241
1) Project Design Stage 243
2) Project Implementation Stage 247
3) Monitoring and Evaluation 249
3. Recommendations for M&E of Global CSR Program 251
1) Directions 251
2) Implementation 252
Copyright 254
[Back Cover] 255
〈Table 1-1〉 Projects of Comprehensive Performance Analysis on the Global CSR Program 38
〈Table 1-2〉 Outline of the TVET Project in Indonesia 42
〈Table 1-3〉 Outline of the Poverty Alleviation Project in Mozambique 43
〈Table 2-1〉 OECD/DAC Evaluation Criteria and Key Questions 50
〈Table 2-2〉 Research Methodology Based on Evaluation Scope 52
〈Table 2-3〉 List of Literature Study 54
〈Table 2-4〉 Interviewees 55
〈Table 2-5〉 Focus Group Interview 55
〈Table 2-6〉 Evaluation Matrix 57
〈Table 2-7〉 The Role of Evaluation Team 72
〈Table 2-8〉 Main Activities Undertaken for Evaluation Period 73
〈Table 3-1〉 Number of Unit Projects and Participants 80
〈Table 3-2〉 Participation frequency of participants 80
〈Table 3-3〉 The status of private sector participants and budget scale of KOICA... 81
〈Table 3-4〉 Budget Scale of Global CSR Programs 81
〈Table 3-5〉 The number of projects by sector(2010-2013) 82
〈Table 3-6〉 The number of projects by region(2010-2013) 82
〈Table 3-7〉 Classification of Global CSR Program 83
〈Table 3-8〉 Alignment with KOICA's ODA Policy 85
〈Table 3-9〉 Global CSR Program's Budget Use Distribution Ratio... 89
〈Table 3-10〉 Global CSR Program's Budget Use Distribution Ratio... 90
〈Table 3-11〉 Cost Structure of Global CSR Program's Vocational Training Project 91
〈Table 3-12〉 Precedent Evaluation Applied Quantitative Aanalysis 93
〈Table 3-13〉 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis(1,000,000KRW) 99
〈Table 3-14〉 Type of Partnership 107
〈Table 3-15〉 Matching project goals with MDGs(according to the project report) 109
〈Table 3-16〉 Matching project goals with MDGs(by the Evaluation Team) 109
〈Table 3-17〉 Resource Supply of the Global CSR Program(million KRW) 110
〈Table 3-18〉 Project Cases which are Same as Participating Companies' Type of... 111
〈Table 3-19〉 Number of Participation of Companies and Partner Organizations in... 113
〈Table 3-20〉 Funding Status by Year 113
〈Table 3-21〉 Size of Projects 114
〈Table 3-22〉 Size of Participating Company 115
〈Table 3-23〉 Project Areas of KOICA PMC Project 117
〈Table 3-24〉 CSV, CSR Type Projects in 2010~2013 117
〈Table 3-25〉 Composition of Participating Actors in CSV Type Projects 120
〈Table 3-26〉 Composition of Participating Actors in CSR Type Projects 121
〈Table 3-27〉 Regional Distribution According to the Size of Participating Companies 123
〈Table 3-28〉 Industry of Participating Companies 124
〈Table 3-29〉 Support Status by Region in 2014(Based on Funding) 126
〈Table 4-1〉 Matching with the Purpose and Objectives of the Project 138
〈Table 4-2〉 PDM of the Project in Indonesia 142
〈Table 4-3〉 Examples of PDM Problem 147
〈Table 4-4〉 Checklists of Project 155
〈Table 4-5〉 Project Cost-Effectiveness in Indonesia 158
〈Table 4-6〉 Comparative Analysis on Cost-Effectiveness by Projects 159
〈Table 4-7〉 Number of Students 160
〈Table 4-8〉 Open Courses 161
〈Table 4-9〉 Starting businesses and employment status 161
〈Table 4-10〉 Student Status(2011-2013) 162
〈Table 4-11〉 The Employment Rate 165
〈Table 4-12〉 Dropout Rate 166
〈Table 4-13〉 Roles between the Partners 171
〈Table 4-14〉 PDM(revised version) 183
〈Table 4-15〉 Contents and Status of Project 190
〈Table 4-16〉 PDM on the Project Planning 198
〈Table 4-17〉 Efficiency of Progress Process 208
〈Table 4-18〉 Mozambique Project Cost-Effectiveness Ratio 211
〈Table 4-19〉 Each Project's Cost-Effectiveness Ratio 212
〈Table 4-20〉 Role of Each Partner 216
〈Table 4-21〉 Employment Status of 2013 Graduates 219
〈Table 4-22〉 Revised Mozambique project PDM 228
〈Table 5-1〉 Recommendations for the each project stages 241
[Figure 1-1] Evolving International Discussion on PPP 33
[Figure 1-2] Scope of Evaluation 36
[Figure 2-1] Triangulation 51
[Figure 2-2] Flow Chart of Research Methodology 52
[Figure 2-3] Evaluation Team 71
[Figure 3-1] Cost-effectiveness analysis Model 97
[Figure 3-2] Answer for the Question That Who Suggested the Project Idea 101
[Figure 3-3] Answer for the Question That Who Carried Out the Demand Survey 101
[Figure 3-4] Satisfaction of the Project Partner 104
[Figure 3-5] Strength(comparative advantage) of Partner Company/Organization 105
[Figure 3-6] The Global CSR Program's Partnership 106
[Figure 3-7] Increase of Projects and Participating Companies 112
[Figure 3-8] Distribution by Project Sector 116
[Figure 3-9] CSV Vs. CSR/Strategic CSR Project's Extension Trend 121
[Figure 3-10] Regional Distribution of the Program(2010~2013) 124
[Figure 3-11] Regional Distribution of KOICA Projects(2000~2012) 125
[Figure 3-12] Korean Overseas Investment Status by Region 126
[Figure 4-1] The 2010-2014 National Medium-Term Development Plan 139
[Figure 4-2] CPS for Indonesia 140
[Figure 4-3] Survey Result for 'Who Did You Interview with in order to Find the... 150
[Figure 4-4] Survey Result for 'Who Recommend Samick Vocational School?' 151
[Figure 4-5] Communication Structure of the Project in Indonesia 153
[Figure 4-6] Communication Structure between the Partners 173
[Figure 4-7] Theory of Change 183
[Figure 4-8] Mozambique's Basic and Strategic Goals of Mid-term Poverty... 193
[Figure 4-9] Mozambique Country Development Strategy 194
[Figure 4-10] Mozambique Project's Communication Structure 207
[Figure 4-11] Theory of change of Mozambique project 227
[Figure 5-1] M&E Process of Global CSR Program 253
List of Boxs
〈Box 1-1〉 3 Tasks for Global CSR Program Evaluation 35
〈Box 1-2〉 Key Evaluation Questions 35
〈Box 1-3〉 Expected Effect of the Evaluation 45
〈Box 3-1〉 Results of Interview with the Persons in Charge 86
〈Box 3-2〉 Results of Interview with the Persons in Charge 88
〈Box 3-3〉 Interview Contents with Copion Staff 100
〈Box 3-4〉 Interview with CSO Staff 102
〈Box 3-5〉 Interview with Staff from Company 103
〈Box 3-6〉 Cooperation Project Module between the Government-Company(example) 106
〈Box 3-7〉 Cooperation Project Module between the Government-CSO(example) 106
〈Box 3-8〉 Interview with Staff from Company 122
〈Box 3-9〉 Interview with Staff from Company 122
〈Box 3-10〉 Interview with Staff from Company 123
〈Box 4-1〉 KOICA Project Coordinator in Indonesia 152
〈Box 4-2〉 Local Coordinator from COPION 155
〈Box 4-3〉 KOICA Official in Indonesia Branch 173
〈Box 4-4〉 Opinions of Person in Charge for the Project Idea 196
〈Box 4-5〉 Order of Making the Project Plan 197
〈Box 4-6〉 Corporate Staff in Charge of the Project' Opinions on Communication... 206
〈Box 4-7〉 NGO Staff in Charge of the Project' Opinions on the Efficiency of... 210
〈Box 4-8〉 A Person in Charge of the Project' Opinions on the Baseline 213
〈Box 4-9〉 Corporate's Opinions on Project Selection 215
〈Box 4-10〉 Corporate's Opinions on Participating in the Project 215