AcknowledgmentsIntroductionDM 2.1-3: The unity and precision of the formal and objective concepts of beingCompeting theories of analogyThe terms of Suarez's inquirySuirez and ScotusDM 2.1 The formal concept of beingDM 2.2 (i) Suarez on rational precisionDM 2.2 (ii) The rational precision and unity of the objective concept of beingDM 2.3 Against the real precision of the objective concept of being from its inferiorsDM 2.4 The ratio of being and its agreement with inferior beingsDM 2.5 The inclusion of being in all rotiones and differencesDM 2.6 The contraction of being to its inferiorsRemarks on the Latin Text and the English TranslationLatin AbbreviationsEnglish AbbreviationsLATIN TEXT AND ENGLISH TRANSLATIONMetaphysical Disputation II: On the Essential Concept or Concept of BeingSection 1 Whether in Our Mind Being as Being Has One Formal Concept Common to All BeingsSection 2 Whether Being Has a Single Objective Concept, or a Single Objective Formal CharacterSection 3 Whether the Nature or Concept of Being Is in Some Way Prescinded from Inferiors Really and Antecedently to the Intellect's OperationSection 4 In What the Nature of Being as Being Consists, and How It Agrees with Inferior BeingsSection 5 Whether the Nature of Being Transcends All Natures and Differences of Inferior Beings in Such a Way That It Is Included in Them Intimately and EssentiallySection 6 How Being as Being Is Contracted or Determined to Its InferiorsBibliographyIndex