생몰정보
소속
직위
직업
활동분야
주기
서지
국회도서관 서비스 이용에 대한 안내를 해드립니다.
검색결과 (전체 1건)
원문 있는 자료 (1) 열기
원문 아이콘이 없는 경우 국회도서관 방문 시 책자로 이용 가능
목차보기더보기
표제지
목차
Abstract 8
제1장 서론 11
I. 연구의 목적 11
II. 선행연구의 검토 13
III. 연구의 범위 및 방법 14
제2장 어업손실보상에 관한 이론적 고찰 16
I. 어업손실보상의 평가대상 어업 16
1. 면허어업 16
2. 허가어업 17
3. 신고어업 19
4. 관행어업 20
II. 어업손실보상 21
1. 공익사업 21
2. 어업손실보상 22
제3장 한정어업면허 피해배상에 대한 고찰 33
I. 한정어업면허제도 33
1. 한정어업면허제도의 취지 및 조건 33
2. 한정어업면허의 필요성 35
3. 한정어업면허의 처분에 관한 사례 38
II. 부관(조건)부 어업 46
1. 어업에 있어서 부관의 개념 및 근거 46
2. 부관부어업의 내용 46
3. 부관부어업의 어업손실보상 47
III. 한정어업면허 피해배상에 대한 고찰 49
1. 손해전보제도 49
2. 한정어업 면허에 대한 보상 51
3. 한정어업 면허에 대한 배상 52
제4장 한정어업면허 피해배상제도의 개선 59
I. 적극적인 한정면허 처분 및 대체어장의 확대 등 59
II. 관계 법령의 재정비 61
III. 손실보상과 손해배상의 범위와 정도에 관한 명확한 구분 63
IV. 제한 및 조건(부관) 64
제5장 결론 66
참고문헌 69
〈표 1〉 서해안 대규모 간척사업의 공사기간 35
〈표 2〉 새만금방조제 사업추진현황 37
〈표 3〉 농림부 질의회신 - 한정어업면허 처분에 대한 소극적 회신 39
〈표 4〉 한정어업면허의 처분 현황 40
〈표 5〉 법제처 질의회신 - 한정어업면허 처분에 대한 적극적 회신 41
〈표 6〉 국민고충처리위원회 43
〈표 7〉 한정어업면허가 일반면허로 전환된 사례 44
〈표 8〉 서산수협관내 한정어업면허 처분현황 (2007년 12월 현재) 54
〈표 9〉 서산수협관내 한정어업에 대한 피해산정액 55
〈표 10〉 온배수 방류에 대한 대법원 판례 58
〈그림 1〉 서해안 대규모 간척사업 현황과 위치 36
초록보기 더보기
Korea is a peninsula and is surrounded by sea in the East, South and West. Therefore, the importance of the sea as a habitat of seafood source has been over emphasized by both the fishermen and Korean people as a whole.
However, for the last few decades, many parts of the sea shore have been exploited for other purposes like reclamation for agricultural, industrial, residential and recreational purposes and for the construction of harbours, bridges, airports, etc. under the name of enterprises or facilities for public good and welfare. As a result of these programs, many fishermen lost their fishing grounds and their future income sources from the sea. Therefore the principal actors such as local and/or central governments have tried to compensate their losses.
However, the compensation of the losses were inadequate to fully support them for a life time as the compensation only covers about 8.33 years of their yearly income in maximum.
This kind of compensation methods have two negative points. The first one is that it is not so easy for the fishermen to start new jobs as they have been carrying out fisheries activities through out their life time. As a result, they may therefore be jobless for the rest of their lives.
Another negative point is that there is a loss of potential seafood production capacity at the shore where all enterprises for the public good were constructed or where the period of the enterprises for the public good went for a very long time. In above sited cases, fishermen could not legally catch any of the fisheries organisms from the area even though fish or shellfish are surplus. If the fisheries organisms are not fully utilized, it is a loss of National wealth and also a loss for both fishermen and consumers. To avoid these negative impacts and to help both fishermen and consumers, issuance of the limited fisheries licences is needed.
However, another problem may arise if the issuance of the limited fisheries licences is done to the fishermen who already received proper compensation for the canceled licences as they may appeal for another compensation for the new limited fisheries licence.
Even though the above potential problem is anticipated, it is better to issue limited fisheries licences for proper utilization and management of natural fisheries resources and thus enhance the income of fishermen in the area.
During the issuance of limited fisheries licence, it is usually issued with some conditions like " ~ do not institute any lawsuit for compensation of damages." However, this condition is very disadvantageous for fishermen. It is true for the fishermen who can not institute any lawsuit for the original case in that the fishermen already received the compensation but other than that, fishermen can be allowed to bring any lawsuit for compensation. The precedent also accept the right of lawsuit of fishermen unless there are disturbing original decisions for compensated case and it is illegal to limit the fishing right of fishermen by the conditions on the permission.
Therefore, compensation of limited fishing licenses were relieved by the laws of civil law, fisheries law, basic environmental policy law, oil pollution damage compensation law, and national reparation law but in reality, it is difficult to prove the damages for compensation.
Of course, there are some duplicated and over compensation cases but most of the fishermen could not have enough compensation for the lost of fishing and working grounds. Therefore, I am giving a few suggestions to improve the compensation of limited fisheries licenses.
Firstly, government authorities should positively issue the limited fisheries licenses if there are not much setback or damages by the enterprises for the public good, for fully enhancing and utilizing and management of national fisheries resources, for developing fisheries industries and for increasing incomes of fishermen.
Secondly, legalization of compensation laws that contains the methods and procedures of compensations in detail. The reason is that it is difficult for the fishermen to receive compensation when accidents occur even though there is a law related with the compensation of fisheries damages. This is because the law does not contains responsibilities of the person(s) who caused the controversy and detailed methods and procedures of compensations. Also, the government should compensate preferentially the fishermen by a special law before being compensated by the International Oil Pollution Compensation Fund (IOPC) if the damaged area is so large and it takes too long for estimating the damages like the case of Taean oil pollution accident. This is because the damages are continuously being increase with time.
Thirdly, in point of fishermen who work normal fisheries activities, the damage from environmental pollution is damage of reparation not compensation. Therefore, the reparation must covers not only direct damages from pollution but also the mental and emotional damages.
Lastly, the conditions in the limited fisheries licenses must be reasonable and practical to avoid violating the rights of the fishermen.
어업손실보상제도의 현황과 적정보상을 위한 개선방안
한정어업면허의 피해배상방법 개선에 관한 연구
어업피해 손실보상시의 할인율에 관한 연구
韓國과 日本의 漁業補償關聯法規에 대한 經濟的 考察
漁業損失補償 關聯法의 改正方向에 관한 硏究
원문구축 및 2018년 이후 자료는 524호에서 직접 열람하십시요.
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
* 표시는 필수사항 입니다.
* 주의: 국회도서관 이용자 모두에게 공유서재로 서비스 됩니다.
저장 되었습니다.
로그인을 하시려면 아이디와 비밀번호를 입력해주세요. 모바일 간편 열람증으로 입실한 경우 회원가입을 해야합니다.
공용 PC이므로 한번 더 로그인 해 주시기 바랍니다.
아이디 또는 비밀번호를 확인해주세요
