본문바로가기

자료 카테고리

전체 1
도서자료 0
학위논문 1
연속간행물·학술기사 0
멀티미디어 0
동영상 0
국회자료 0
특화자료 0

도서 앰블럼

전체 (0)
일반도서 (0)
E-BOOK (0)
고서 (0)
세미나자료 (0)
웹자료 (0)
전체 (1)
학위논문 (1)
전체 (0)
국내기사 (0)
국외기사 (0)
학술지·잡지 (0)
신문 (0)
전자저널 (0)
전체 (0)
오디오자료 (0)
전자매체 (0)
마이크로폼자료 (0)
지도/기타자료 (0)
전체 (0)
동영상자료 (0)
전체 (0)
외국법률번역DB (0)
국회회의록 (0)
국회의안정보 (0)
전체 (0)
표·그림DB (0)
지식공유 (0)

도서 앰블럼

전체 1
국내공공정책정보
국외공공정책정보
국회자료
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
지방자치단체 ()
공공기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
의회기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
국회의원정책자료 ()
입법기관자료 ()

검색결과

검색결과 (전체 1건)

검색결과제한

열기
논문명/저자명
강원도 산림습원의 생태환경에 관한 연구 = (The)study of ecological and environmental in forest wetlands of Gangwon province / 손호준 인기도
발행사항
춘천 : 강원대학교 대학원, 2015.2
청구기호
TD 634.9 -15-54
형태사항
xix, 220 p. ; 26 cm
자료실
전자자료
제어번호
KDMT1201543889
주기사항
학위논문(박사) -- 강원대학교 대학원, 임학과, 2015.2. 지도교수: 박완근
원문
미리보기

목차보기더보기

표제지

초록

목차

I. 산림습원의 정의 23

II. 연구 30

CHAPTER 1. 강원도 산림습원 식물상의 다양성 31

서론 32

조사지 개황 35

1. 대상지 위치 35

2. 기상조건 37

재료 및 방법 40

1. 식물의 종류 조성 40

2. 식물상 분석 41

3. 식물상의 유사성 분석 45

결과 및 고찰 46

1. 식물의 종류 조성 46

2. 식물상 분석 49

3. 식물상의 유사성 분석 66

결론 68

CHAPTER 2. 강원도 산림습원의 식물군집과 입지요인의 분석 73

서론 74

재료 및 방법 76

1. 연구지역 76

2. 식생조사 80

3. 입지요인 분석 81

4. 다변량 군집분석 81

5. 통계분석 82

결과 및 고찰 83

1. 식생군집구조 분석 83

2. 식생군집의 중요치 및 다양성지수 89

3. 식생군집의 입지요인 133

4. 식생군집과 입지요인의 관계 134

결론 138

CHAPTER 3. 산림습원의 퇴적물 특성과 습지유형분류 142

서론 143

재료 및 방법 145

1. 연구대상지 개요 145

2. 연구방법 149

결과 및 고찰 150

1. 습지 퇴적물의 특성 150

2. 습지간 이화학적 특성의 차이 159

결론 168

CHAPTER 4. 습지 및 산지에서 생육하는 목본식물의 생리반응 비교 (들메나무, 버드나무, 참조팝나무, 신나무, 다릅나무, 호랑버들) 171

서론 172

재료 및 방법 174

1. 실험 재료 및 기상인자 조사 174

2. 토양의 수분함량 및 엽수분포텐셜 측정 174

3. 광합성 측정 174

4. 엽록소 함량 측정 175

5. 엽록소 형광반응 측정 175

6. 통계분석 176

결과 및 고찰 177

1. 기상인자 분석 177

2. 토양의 수분함량 및 엽수분포텐셜 측정 178

3. 광합성 비교 181

4. 엽록소 함량비교 188

5. 엽록소 형광분석 190

결론 196

III. 참고문헌 197

IV. Abstract 212

V. Appendix 226

Table 1. Classification and contents of Inland wetlands(Ramsar Convention) 28

Table 2. Classification of Forest wetlands Type. 29

Table 1-1. The overview of the forest wetlands. 36

Table 1-2. Categorizing Vascular Plant Species Occurring. 44

Table 1-3. The abridged list of the plants in surveyed area. 48

Table 1-4. The list of the Korea endemic plants in study area. 50

Table 1-5. The list of the Korea endemic plants in study area. 53

Table 1-6. Degree of selected of the specific plant species. 55

Table 1-7. The list of specific plant species by floristic region in study area. 56

Table 1-8. The list of naturalized plants in study area. 61

Table 1-9. Categorizing vascular plant species by frequency of occurrence in study area. 63

Table 1-10. Categorizing wetland plants by degree of wetness and morphology in study area. 64

Table 1-11. Categorizing plants habitats in study area. 65

Table 2-1. Description of survey area. 78

Table 2-2. Importance value of species at tree layer. 90

Table 2-3. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 91

Table 2-4. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 92

Table 2-5. Importance value of species at herb layer. 93

Table 2-6. Importance value of species at tree layer. 95

Table 2-7. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 96

Table 2-8. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 97

Table 2-9. Importance value of species at herb layer. 98

Table 2-10. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 100

Table 2-11. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 100

Table 2-12. Importance value of species at herb layer. 101

Table 2-13. Importance value of species at tree layer. 103

Table 2-14. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 103

Table 2-15. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 104

Table 2-16. Importance value of species at herb layer. 105

Table 2-17. Importance value of species at tree layer. 107

Table 2-18. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 108

Table 2-19. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 109

Table 2-20. Importance value of species at herb layer. 110

Table 2-21. Importance value of species at tree layer. 112

Table 2-22. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 113

Table 2-23. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 114

Table 2-24. Importance value of species at herb layer. 115

Table 2-25. Importance value of species at tree layer. 117

Table 2-26. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 118

Table 2-27. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 119

Table 2-28. Importance value of species at herb layer. 120

Table 2-29. Importance value of species at tree layer. 122

Table 2-30. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 123

Table 2-31. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 124

Table 2-32. Importance value of species at herb layer. 125

Table 2-33. Importance value of species at subtree layer. 127

Table 2-34. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 127

Table 2-35. Importance value of species at herb layer. 128

Table 2-36. Importance value of species at shrub layer. 130

Table 2-37. Importance value of species at herb layer. 131

Table 2-38. Nine communities and species diversity in forest wetlands. 132

Table 2-39. Nine communities and environmental factors in forest wetlands. 135

Table 2-40. Correlation coefficient of site factors with the first axis and the second axis. 137

Table 3-1. Description of Sediment characteristics in Simjeok and Mt. Myeon forest wetlands. 155

Table 3-2. Description of Sediment characteristics in Mt. Jeombong wetland, Jilmoineup, Mt. Sohwangbyung wetland and Yangyang forest wetland. 156

Table 3-3. Descriptive statistics of the forest wetlands sediment. 157

Table 3-4. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Simjeok forest wetland. 160

Table 3-5. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Mt. Myeon wetland. 160

Table 3-6. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Mt. Jeombong wetland. 161

Table 3-7. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Jilmoineup. 161

Table 3-8. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Mt. Sohwangbyung wetland. 162

Table 3-9. Correlation between sediment characteristics in Yangyang forest wetland. 162

Table 3-10. The main sediment characteristics Principal Component Analysis. 165

Table 3-11. Community types representative value. 167

Table 4-1. Summary of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters from JIP test. 176

Table 4-2. Comparison of chlorophyll content in the leaves of six tree species. 189

Figure 1-1. Location of study area. 36

Figure 1-2. Comparison of the amount of precipitation and evapotranspiration. 39

Figure 1-3. A. Cicuta virosa L. 독미나리; B. Eriophorum gracile Koch 작은황새풀; C. Cypripedium macranthon Sw. 복주머니란; D. Megaleranthis... 54

Figure 1-4. UPGMA tree based on vascular flora date for 6 region of forest wetlands. 67

Figure 2-1. Location of study area. 77

Figure 2-2. Community classification by cluster analysis in forest wetlands. 85

Figure 2-3. Distribution of nine plant communities in forest wetlands. 86

Figure 2-4. Stand ordination by Nondirectional Multimetric Scaling in forest wetlands. Axis 1 and 2 explained 39.5% and 34.1% of the total... 87

Figure 2-5. Species ordination by Nondirectional Multimetric Scaling in forest wetlands. 88

Figure 2-6. Relationship between nine classified communities and environmental factors analyzed by Canonical Correspondence Analysis... 136

Figure 3-1. Location of study area. 148

Figure 3-2. Soil texture triangle 151

Figure 3-3. Exchangeable cations distribution in the forest wetlands sediments. 158

Figure 3-4. Two-step cluster analysis 164

Figure 3-5. Wetland communities by sediment type distribution 164

Figure 3-6. Principal component analysis scatterplot 165

Figure 3-7. Two-step cluster analysis 167

Figure 4-1. Changes of temperature (T) and relative humidity (RH) during 2013. 177

Figure 4-2. Comparison of soil water contents of wetland and dryland. 179

Figure 4-3. Comparison of predawn water potential and mid-day water potential of six tree species. 180

Figure 4-4. Comparison of maximum net photosynthetic rate (PN max) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 181

Figure 4-5. Comparison of stomatal conductance (gs) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 182

Figure 4-6. Comparison of stomatal transpiration rate (E) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 183

Figure 4-7. Comparison of intercellular CO₂ concentration (Ci) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 185

Figure 4-8. Comparison of Intercellular CO₂ concentration / atmospheric CO₂ concentration of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 185

Figure 4-9. Comparison of stomatal limitation (LS) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 186

Figure 4-10. Comparison of water use efficiency (WUE) of six tree species. (on PPFD 1,000 μmol·m-²·s-¹).(이미지참조) 187

Figure 4-11. Comparison of ΦPO of six tree species.(이미지참조) 191

Figure 4-12. Comparison of ΦEo of six tree species.(이미지참조) 192

Figure 4-13. Comparison of ΨO of six tree species.(이미지참조) 193

Figure 4-14. Comparison of DIo/RC of six tree species. 194

Figure 4-15. Comparison of performance index (PIABS) of six tree species.(이미지참조) 195

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차
연속간행물 팝업 열기 연속간행물 팝업 열기