권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Title Page
ABSTRACT
Contents
1. Introduction 15
1.1. Background 15
1.2. Research significance 16
1.3. Ideas and methods 17
1.3.1. Software development model 18
1.3.2. Method of generating math questions 18
1.3.3. Intelligent solutions to the examination system 19
1.4. Thesis structure 19
2. Research Review 21
2.1. Software development models 21
2.1.1. Traditional software development models and their limitations 22
2.1.2. Agile development model and its limitations 23
2.1.3. RUP model and its limitations 25
2.2. Intelligent solutions to existing examination systems 30
2.2.1. Random selection method 30
2.2.2. Backtracking algorithm 32
2.2.3. Hybrid algorithm 33
2.2.4. Analysis and conclusion 33
2.3. Reinforcement learning 34
2.3.1. Definition 34
2.3.2. Q-Learning 37
2.3.3. Analysis and conclusion 39
3. Research Methods 41
3.1. Adapted RUP 41
3.1.1. Analysis of the characteristics of R&D projects 41
3.1.2. Selection of Software Development Model for R&D project 44
3.1.3. The adapting and tailoring of RUP 45
3.2. Mathematical models for generating questions 51
3.2.1. The ideas of mathematical models 52
3.2.2. Analysis and Modeling 53
3.2.3. Section Summary 57
3.3. Intelligent solutions 57
3.3.1. Traditional solution 58
3.3.2. Intelligent solution based on AI algorithms 66
4. R&D Process and Results 74
4.1. Inception phase 75
4.1.1. Business Modeling 77
4.1.2. Requirements 79
4.1.3. Analysis and Design 81
4.1.4. Implementation 84
4.1.5. Test 84
4.1.6. Project Management 87
4.2. Elaboration phase 87
4.2.1. Analysis and Design 88
4.2.2. Implementation 97
4.2.3. Project Management 97
4.3. Construction phase 99
4.3.1. First round of iterations 99
4.3.2. Second round of iterations 106
4.3.3. Third round of iterations 115
5. Conclusion 127
초록 129
References 131
Appendix 138
Table 1. Redefinition of each phase 46
Table 2. The necessity of workflows 47
Table 3. New definitions of core workflows 48
Table 4. Analysis of Matrix Addition and Subtraction 54
Table 5. Analysis of a question type for Calculating Un-... 56
Table 6. Difficulty levels and difficulty reference value 62
Table 7. The table of difficulty coefficients D(m, d) 67
Table 8. Three dimensions of requirements 80
Table 9. Function test 85
Table 10. Some test examples of the mathematical model:... 86
Table 11. The analysis of the constant-matrix multiplication 89
Table 12. The analysis of the matrix-matrix multiplication 90
Table 13. The analysis of the calculation of a simple deter-... 92
Table 14. The analysis of the solving linear equations using... 93
Table 15. The main functions of AHMES 94
Table 16. The basic interfaces of main functions 95
Table 17. The statistics of mathematical models designed in... 98
Table 18. The internal test results 105
Table 19. Feedback on the examination papers 112
Table 20. The difficulty adjustment results 113
Table 21. Statistics of currently implemented linear algebra... 114
Table 22. Data from one run 124
Table 23. The result of the adjustment in this test 125
Figure 1. Waterfall Model 23
Figure 2. Process diagram of Scrum 24
Figure 3. Rational Unified Process 28
Figure 4. A tailored simplified RUP 28
Figure 5. Reinforcement Learning 35
Figure 6. Adapted RUP 51
Figure 7. The flow chart of generating examination paper 61
Figure 8. The flow chart of difficulty adjustment 63
Figure 9. The flowchart of AL 71
Figure 10. The adapted RUP Cycle of AHMES 75
Figure 11. The use case diagram 79
Figure 12. The flowchart of a mathematical model: Matrix... 83
Figure 13. The structure of AHMES 94
Figure 14. The flow chart of AHMES 96
Figure 15. The Flow chart of solving linear equations using... 101
Figure 16. The flow chart of "AXB=C, calculate X" 102
Figure 17. A screenshot of the command line interface 104
Figure 18. Solving linear equations by Cramer's Rule 109
Figure 19. The modified structure 118
Figure 20. The modified flow chart of AHMES 119
Figure 21. The models' difficulty curves 122
Figure 22. The simulation test result 123
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.