본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

Contents

Institutional isomorphism and decoupling among Korean firms : adoption of performance compensation system / Joon Han ; Jasook Koo 1

[요약] 1

Introduction 1

Theoretical review 3

Institutional Isomorphism and its mechanisms 3

Decoupling and Its Antecedents 4

Data and method 6

Data 6

Variables and Methods 7

Results 10

Concluding remarks 14

References 16

초록보기

This study draws on the idea of isomorphism and decoupling to explain the rapid diffusion of

performance compensation system among Korean firms in its compromised rather than pure

form. Empirical analysis of data on Korean firms confirms that three mechanisms of

isomorphism?coercive, normative, and mimetic?operate in the process toward isomorphism

among Korean firms in their adoption of performance compensation system, but only its

compromised form between seniority and performance pay. While labor union as a potential

source of resistance promotes decupling, the role of professionals such as consultants or HRM

experts suppresses the possibility of decoupling.

참고문헌 (39건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Safety in Numbers: Downsizing and the Deinstitutionalization of Permanent Employment in Japan 네이버 미소장
2 Made to Fit: How Practices Vary as They Diffuse 네이버 미소장
3 Bae, J. 2006. Saram kiban kyongjaeng uwi rul uihan injokjawon ron (Human Resource Management for Competing Edge Based on Human Capital). Seoul: Hongmunsa (in Korean). 미소장
4 Bae, J., and O. Park. 2005. “Jonryak jok injokjawon kwanri wa jojik ui hyuckshin songkwa: tamsaek jok hyokshin songkwa wa hwalyong jok hyokshin songkwa ui bikyo bunsok” (Strategic human resource management and innovation performance of organizations: comparison of explorative and exploitative innovation performance). Insa Jojik Yonku 13(2): 147-186 (in Korean). 미소장
5 Bae, J., and C. Rowley, 2001. “The impact of globalization on HRM: the case of South Korea.” Journal of World Business 36(4): 402-428. 미소장
6 Evasion, Reinterpretation and Decoupling: European Commission Responses to the ‘External Dimension’ of Immigration and Asylum 네이버 미소장
7 Bourguignon, A., O. Saulpic and P. Zarlowski. 2006. “Management accounting change in the public sector: a French case study and a new institutional perspective.” ESSEC center de recherche working paper. 미소장
8 Boxenbaum, E. and S. Jonsson, 2008. “Isomorphism, diffusion and decoupling.” In R. Greewood, C. Oliver and R. Suddaby (eds.), Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage. 미소장
9 Brunsson, N. 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decisions and Action in Organizations. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press. 미소장
10 Chang, E. 2005. “Songkwakupje ui hwalyong mit hyokwa e kwanhan yonku: jedo iron kwa dongki buyo sikak ui multi-level bunsok” (Pay-for-performance in Korean companies: explanations from institutional and motivation Theories). Kyonyonghak Yonku 34(3): 847-865 (in Korean). 미소장
11 Compressed modernity and its discontents: South Korean society in transtion 네이버 미소장
12 Czarniawska, Barbara and Guje Sevon, 1996. Translating Organizational Change. New York: Walter de Gruyter. 미소장
13 The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 네이버 미소장
14 Djelic, Marie-Laure, 1998. Exporting the American Model: The Postwar Transformation of European Business. New York: Oxford University Press. 미소장
15 Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law 네이버 미소장
16 SYMBOLS AND SUBSTANCE IN ORGANIZATIONAL RESPONSE TO CIVIL RIGHTS LAW 네이버 미소장
17 Global Competition, Institutions, and the Diffusion of Organizational Practices: The International Spread of ISO 9000 Quality Certificates 네이버 미소장
18 Best Practices or Best Guesses? Assessing the Efficacy of Corporate Affirmative Action and Diversity Policies 네이버 미소장
19 Kim, H., K. Park and M. Lee. 2009. “Kiop sawhoi konghon kyoljong yoin ui sikipyol byonwha e kwanhan yonku: 1990 nyondae choban ihoo kiop ui kibukum kyumo rul jungshimuro” (Research on the changing determinants of corporate social responsibility: focusing on the amount of firms’ donation since early 1990’s). Hankuk Sawhoihak 43(4): 1-36 (in Korean). 미소장
20 Kim, M. 2009. “Jedo hwankyong e daehan jojik daeung bangshik urosoui bunri wa uison: kongkongkikwan hyukshin pyongka rul jungshim uro” (Decoupling and hypocrisy as an organizational response to institutional environment: focusing on the evaluation of public agency reform). Hankuk Haengjong Yonku 26(3): 55-78 (in Korean). 미소장
21 Kim, S. 2003. Injokjawon Kwanri ui Saerowun Paradigm (The New Paradigm of Human Resource Management). Seoul: Mounkyounsa (in Korean). 미소장
22 Krasner, Stephen, 1999. Sovereignity: Organized Hypocrisy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 미소장
23 Lee, H., K. Baek, and Y. Jang. 2007. “Hankuk kiop ui sawoi isa sonim: jojik iron jok jopkun” (Appointment of external board members among Korean firms: approach from organization theory). Hankuk Sawhoihak 41(2): 27-66 (in Korean). 미소장
24 Lee, K., and J. Oh. 2002. “Sawoi isa chokwa sonim e kwanhan jedoron jok kochal” (Institutionalist study on the over-appointment of external board members). Kyongyonghak Yonku 31(5): 1229-1254 (in Korean). 미소장
25 Lee, Y. 2005. “Jamjae jipdan bunsok” (The Latent Class Analysis). In Jaeyol Lee (eds.), Sahwoi Kwahak ui Kokup Kyeryang Bunsok: Wonri wa Shilje (Advanced Quantitative Analysis in Social Science: The Principles and Practices). Seoul: Seoul National University Press (in Korean) 미소장
26 Menard, S. W. 2002. Applied Logistic Regression Analysis. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. 미소장
27 Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 네이버 미소장
28 Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes 네이버 미소장
29 Park, J. 2000. “Sonkwajuui bosang chekye” (Performance based pay system). In The Korea Labor Insitute (ed)., 21 Seki hyong Injokjawon Ron (Human Resource Management of the 21st century), Seoul: Moungkoungsa (in Korean). 미소장
30 Park, J., and H. Ahn. 1999. Hankuk Koyong Kwankye ui Bynhwa wa Mirae (The Changes and Future Direction of Korean Employment Practices). Seoul: The Korea Employers’ Federation (in Korean) 미소장
31 Roh, Y., D. Kim, W. Park. 2003. “Hyoksinjok insakwanri-jedo doip ui yonghyang yoin” (The Factors of Adoting Innovative HRM practices). Kyongyonghak Yonku 32(4): 955-981 (in Korean). 미소장
32 Scott, R. 1995. Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 미소장
33 In Search of Excellence: Fads, Success Stories, and Adaptive Emulation 네이버 미소장
34 Diffusion in Organizations and Social Movements: From Hybrid Corn to Poison Pills 네이버 미소장
35 Sutton, John R. and Frank Dobbin. 1996. “The Two Faces of Governance: Responses to Legal Uncertainty in American Firms, 1955-1985.” American Sociological Review 61: 794-811. 미소장
36 The Ministry of Labor, 2005. Survey of Situation of Pay-for-performance and Profit Sharing among Korean Enterprises (2005. 12). 미소장
37 Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems 네이버 미소장
38 Westney, E. 1987. Imitation and Innovation: the Transfer of Western Organizational Patterns to Meiji Japan. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 미소장
39 Decoupling Policy from Practice: The Case of Stock Repurchase Programs 네이버 미소장