생몰정보
소속
직위
직업
활동분야
주기
서지
국회도서관 서비스 이용에 대한 안내를 해드립니다.
검색결과 (전체 1건)
원문 있는 자료 (1) 열기
원문 아이콘이 없는 경우 국회도서관 방문 시 책자로 이용 가능
목차보기더보기
목차
현행민법 시행 전 異姓養子 및 서養子의 허용여부 : 조선성명복구령의 효력범위와 관련하여 / 이홍민 1
I. 서론 1
II. 이성양자 및 서양자 제도의 역사적 전개 3
1. 고려시대 이전의 이성양자 4
2. 조선시대의 이성양자 6
3. 1905년 한일협상조약 체결 이후 1939년 조선민사령 개정 전의 이성양자 9
4. 1939년 조선민사령의 개정에 의한 이성양자 및 서양자의 허용 12
III. 조선성명복구령의 시행 14
1. 조선성명복구령의 공포·시행 14
2. 조선성명복구령의 내용 16
3. 조선성명복구령의 해석상 문제되는 점 19
IV. 조선성명복구령 시행 이후의 이성양자 및 서양자 24
1. 1947년 11월 18일의 사법부장 통첩 24
2. 1949년 3월 26일의 대법원 판결 25
3. 1952년 5월 10일의 대법원장 통첩 27
4. 1967년 4월 24일의 대법원 결정 28
5. 1994년 5월 24일의 대법원 전원합의체 판결 30
V. 결론 31
《참고문헌》 34
1. 단행본 34
2. 논문 35
3. 기타 36
[요약] 37
초록보기 더보기
The blood was not so valued before the Goryeo Dynasty, and thus adopting sons from different clans were not uncommon. In the Goryeo Dynasty, however, community members began to make more of blood and so run in their blood through their family names. As a result, they imposed stricter conditions on adoptees and limited the adoptable to children aged less than 3. In the Joseon Dynasty, the society began to pursue Confucianism and then did not qualify sons adopted from different clans to succeed to family lines. Instead, however, it allowed its members to adopt sons aged less than 3 from different clans and eunuch families to adopt sons from different clans. The system lasted during the Joseon Dynasty. During the Japanese occupation, however, adoptees from different clans were not accepted without exception. Then one day of 1939, with the Ordinance-19 the Joseon civil affairs ordinance was revised. Resultingly, Koreans were forced to change their Korean-style names into Japanese-style names and at the same time were allowed to adopt their sons-in-law as their sons and to adopt sons from different clans.
After Korea was liberated from Japanese colonial rule, the U.S. military government enacted a special law ‘Restoration of Korean Names’ as it nullified the names changed into Japanese styles and defeased ordinances, laws, orders and even notifications against the special law. However, there was controversy as to how far the special law would be applied. Considering the debate on the recognition of adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees under the Ordinance-19 enacted in 1939 and the relevant explanation of Japanese Government-General Korea, it is judged that the recognition of adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees is closely related to the change of Korean-style names into Japanese-style names, whereupon adoptees from different clans and sons-in-law as adoptees are deemed to be against the special law.
After independence, the administration was executed in accordance with the foregoing interpretation. On May 24, 1994, however, the full panel of the Supreme Court ruled that adoptees adopted from different clans was not illegal until the Joseon civil affairs ordinance was amended on February 11, 1940 (sentence-93므119) and thus broke the precedent. The ruling suggests that the ‘Restoration of Korean Names’ was not to address the problems of adoptees but was only to restore Japanese-style names to Korean-style names. The problem was that the family name system was not reflected in the ruling. The ruling was confined to cases on which the ruling would not exert any influences. However, it is a pity that the full panel of the Supreme Court did not pay close attention when broking the precedent.
권호기사보기
참고문헌 (76건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )더보기
원문구축 및 2018년 이후 자료는 524호에서 직접 열람하십시요.
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내01
2018년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
* 표시는 필수사항 입니다.
* 주의: 국회도서관 이용자 모두에게 공유서재로 서비스 됩니다.
저장 되었습니다.
로그인을 하시려면 아이디와 비밀번호를 입력해주세요. 모바일 간편 열람증으로 입실한 경우 회원가입을 해야합니다.
공용 PC이므로 한번 더 로그인 해 주시기 바랍니다.
아이디 또는 비밀번호를 확인해주세요
