생몰정보
소속
직위
직업
활동분야
주기
서지
국회도서관 서비스 이용에 대한 안내를 해드립니다.
검색결과 (전체 1건)
원문 있는 자료 (1) 열기
원문 아이콘이 없는 경우 국회도서관 방문 시 책자로 이용 가능
목차보기더보기
목차
투자자보호법제로서의 한국 자본시장법과 일본 금융상품거래법에 대한 고찰 / 강영기 1
I. 들어가며-투자자보호를 위한 법제개혁의 시대 1
II. 한국의 자본시장법의 개요 3
1. 자본시장법의 제정배경과 의의 3
2. 자본시장법상의 투자자보호제도 8
3. 투자자보호법제로서의 문제점과 향후과제 12
III. 일본의 금융상품거래법의 개요 13
1. 금융상품거래법의 제정배경과 의의 13
2. 금융상품거래법상의 투자자보호법리 20
3. 금융상품거래법의 문제점과 향후과제 22
IV. 맺음말-진정한 투자자보호를 위하여 24
♣ 참고문헌 26
〈Abstract〉 28
초록보기 더보기
The capital market law of Korea and the financial goods transactions law of Japan become, with regulation reform and investor protective reinforcement of capital market, as investor protective laws of step forward one form more and faithfully is evaluated they do. Of course, compares hitherto and the fact that the part which is an investor protection is strengthened is fact. By the way, the investor discusses one capital market relation laws at prerequisite, the part which is a laws for an investor protection being emphasized encounters, but fact, almost there is not discussion about the investor protection which is genuine. Anyway, as the tendency whose is general to understand with investor preservation law, there is a possibility of doing about the capital market relation laws including a Financial Services Act. Of course, banking system reform mainly the reform of the financial institution is most. So, I think that the protection of the common people who includes the consumer as the investor being well discussed is difficult. Consequently, emphasizes an investor protection mind oneself will be able to sympathize. But sees in historical experience and, capital market bringing the situation of bubble economy even when but, the case where the bubble condition collapses must remember a fact to drive absurd unhappiness, comes. Collapse of bubble economy becomes unemployed, crime, to become one of cause of warfare etc., also is damaged the private citizen is many. The investor, is not as only the relative person of transactions, as one person of the citizen is to be damaged huge. By the way, when discussing an investor protection, the protection of one investor is discussed transactions relationship of the financial investment goods with a prerequisite generally. But that thinks that the discussion of different dimension is necessary. The investor protective principle of law, could be formed well from only under the situation where the principal part of financial system what, is well maintained. Namely, first of all, provides all information which are necessary to an investment judgment and the competition which is fair is guaranteed, the market system is necessary. And, for the maintenance of such system from the financial brokerage voluntary contribution is necessary. Then automatically is connected with the investor protection which is substantial. Actually, about investor protection only institutional maintenance situation sees, but in the investor protective concept which departs from a private autonomous principle, the investor protective principle of law which is substantial exists, is difficult. Therefore, the precondition sufficiency for an investor protection at prerequisite, must discuss the investor protection which is genuine the thing, rightly is basic recognition of capital market legal logic. Consequently, to the case which discusses an investor protective laws, there is a necessity which will escape from hitherto transactions legal recognition. And, must convert with capital market legal recognition.
권호기사보기
참고문헌 (31건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )더보기
원문구축 및 2018년 이후 자료는 524호에서 직접 열람하십시요.
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내02
2018년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
* 표시는 필수사항 입니다.
* 주의: 국회도서관 이용자 모두에게 공유서재로 서비스 됩니다.
저장 되었습니다.
로그인을 하시려면 아이디와 비밀번호를 입력해주세요. 모바일 간편 열람증으로 입실한 경우 회원가입을 해야합니다.
공용 PC이므로 한번 더 로그인 해 주시기 바랍니다.
아이디 또는 비밀번호를 확인해주세요
