권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
This paper takes note of the phenomenon, in which concepts such as “neo-mythologism” or “mythologism” are catching on in recent Chinese mythological field. It could be understood that for about a decade since 2004, the concept neo-mythologism presented by mythologists Ye Shuxian and others was a trend, which has then made way for that of mythologism proposed by Yang Lihui since 2014. These two concepts appeared in existing literary criticisms, but the former was used to indicate the signs of the revival of mythology that was noticeable in fantasy fictions, movies, or electronic games, which were immensely popular from the late twentieth century through early twenty-first century, whereas the latter referred to the use and reconstruction of myths in contemporary societies.
This paper was motivated by the need and desire to understand the trend of present-oriented mythology appearing in recent Chinese mythological world, through which to explore the nowness of mythology. For this purpose, the formation of Ye Shuxian’s discourse of neo-mythologism, as well as its development and primary arguments were first examined. His discourse of neo-mythologism has markedly positive aspects in that it expanded the horizon of mythological studies which moved beyond the academic rigorism, pursued its contemporary significance, and further developed the paths of dynamic criticism and creation by underscoring the role of mythology in literary criticism. However, it must be treated with caution in that the concept of “myth” can appear somewhat confusing, as he has broadened the subjects covered by mythology to excess. Hence, in discussing the nowness of mythology, one needs to distinguish between the mythicalness and the appropriation of myths. Another cautionary note is that in emphasizing the so-called “Eastern values” or “feminine values” through his neo-mythologism, he has allowed the possibility of yet another self-orientalism to be produced. On the other hand, the discourse of mythologism proposed by Yang Lihui deals with the appropriation of myths or the use and reconstruction of myths in contemporary societies in a more strict sense, which requires continued attention, as it is currently a topic that is actively brought up and discussed within Chinese mythological world.번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
---|---|---|
1 | 『民間文化論壇』 2017. 第5期 總第246期 | 미소장 |
2 | 『長江大學學報(社會科學版)』 2017. 第40卷 第5期 | 미소장 |
3 | 『民俗硏究』, 2017. 第6期, 總第136期 | 미소장 |
4 | 葉舒憲, 「《哈利·波特》與後現代文化尋根」, 『海南廣播電視大學學報』, 2002. 第2期. | 미소장 |
5 | 葉舒憲, 「略論當代 “女神文明”的復興」, 『江蘇行政學院學報』, 2005. 第1期. | 미소장 |
6 | 葉舒憲, 「人類學想象與新神話主義」, 『文學理論前沿』 第2輯, 北京大學出版社, 2005. | 미소장 |
7 | 葉舒憲, 「神話如何重述」, 『長江大學學報(社會科學版)』 第29卷 第1期, 2006. 2. | 미소장 |
8 | 葉舒憲, 「比較視野下的新神話主義——後現代的神話觀——兼評《神話簡史》」, 『中國比較文學』, 2007. 第1期, 總第66期. | 미소장 |
9 | 葉舒憲, 「再論新神話主義——兼評, 「再論新神話主義——兼評中國重述神話的學術缺失傾向」, 『中國比較文學』, 2007. 第4期, 總第69期. | 미소장 |
10 | 葉舒憲, 「《阿凡達》與卡梅隆的“人類學想像”」, 『百色學院學報』, 2010. 4. | 미소장 |
11 | 葉舒憲, 「新神話主義與文化尋根」, 『人民政協報』, 2010. 7. 12. | 미소장 |
12 | 李小娟, 「“新神話主義”與“重述神話”研究的現狀與未來」, 『重慶三峽學院學報』, 2012. 第2期. | 미소장 |
13 | 陳坤·楊曉林, 「新神話主義旗幟下的魔幻電影初探)」, 『電影文學』, 2007. 8. | 미소장 |
14 | 孫濤, 「當代消費主義思潮影響下的“神話重述”」, 『文敎資料』, 2012. 9. | 미소장 |
15 | 楊利慧, 「遺産旅遊語境中的神話主義——以導遊詞底本與導遊的敘事表演爲中心」, 『民俗硏究』, 2014. 第1期 總第113期. | 미소장 |
16 | 楊利慧, 「當代中國電子媒介中的神話主義」, 『雲南師範大學學報(哲學社會科學版)』, 第46卷 第4期, 2014. 7. | 미소장 |
17 | 安德明, 「卷首語: 以積極創新推動學術發展」 『民間文化論壇』 2017. 第5期. 總第246期. | 미소장 |
18 | 엘레아자르 모이세예비치 멜레틴스키 지음, 박종소·최행규·차지원 옮김, 『신화시학』1·2, 나남, 2016. (Eleazar Moiseevich Meletinsky, Poetika Mifa, Nauka Publisher, 1976.) | 미소장 |
19 | 유강하, 『고전 다시 쓰기와 문화 리텔링』, 단비, 2017. | 미소장 |
20 | 21세기의 새로운 '변신이야기' : 『벽노』속의 '변형' 이미지와 신화가 가지는 의미에 대하여 | 소장 |
21 | A Study of ‘Re-written Myth' as a Subversive Thought- The Analysis of the Eugenic Allegory in RenJian | 소장 |
22 | 신화 다시 쓰기 : 李銳의『人間』, 葉兆言의『后羿』, 蘇童의『碧奴』, 阿來의『格薩爾王』의 '반영웅주의' 비교를 중심으로 | 소장 |
23 | Richard Bauman's Performance Theory and the Development of Chinese Folkloristics | 소장 |
24 | 정재서, 『동양적인 것의 슬픔』, 살림, 2006. | 미소장 |
25 | 장경렬·진형준·정재서 편역, 『상상력이란 무엇인가』, 살림, 1997. | 미소장 |
26 | 질베르 뒤랑 지음, 진형준 옮김, 『상상력의 과학과 철학』, 살림, 1997. | 미소장 |
27 | The Evolution of East-Asian Discourses as critical regionalism in Korea | 소장 |
28 | 카렌 암스트롱 지음, 이다희 옮김, 『신화의 역사』, 문학동네, 2005. | 미소장 |
29 | 마틴 버낼 지음, 오흥식 옮김, 『블랙 아테나 1: 날조된 고대 그리스, 1785-1985』, 소나무, 2006. | 미소장 |
30 | 마틴 버낼 지음, 오흥식 옮김, 『블랙 아테나 2: 고고학 및 문헌 증거』, 소나무, 2012. | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내10
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.