본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

According to previous studies, Korean writing is characterized by ki-sung-chon-kyul. Korean writing has been regarded as inductive, implicit, and indirect. It was claimed that Korean students have difficulty understanding English texts due to differing textual features, and for the same reason, English-speaking people have difficulty understanding written texts in Korean. The primary aim of this study is to challenge these hypotheses on the features of Korean texts. In an attempt to fill the gap, this study investigates high school Korean language arts textbooks and student writing samples. The present study both adds to a growing body of literature on international writing studies and enriches the understanding of our assumptions about written texts.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
A study on pre-service teachers' misconceptions about the viewer Jeong, Jinseok p.27-53

A reevaluation of Korean written discourse: an analysis of contemporary Korean high school student writing and Korean language arts textbooks Kwak, Subeom p.77-109

Identifying key domains and criteria for the assessment of K-12 students' digital multimodal composition : a literature review Park, Sohee p.111-137

An analysis of research trends in KFL education for overseas Koreans Sim, Sangmin p.139-157

A systematic literature review of research on writing across the curriculum (WAC) Ahn, Sanghee, Lee, Changhee p.5-25

Child reader's process of selecting picture books based on gender : focused on 2nd grade elementary student Yu, Seongryeong, Cheon, Haeju p.197-218

A preliminary discussion of talent cultivation of Korean MTI in China's higher learning institutions Juhua Jin, Jiao Liu, Yingxin Zhao p.55-76

A study of the linguistic culture of Korean adolescents: focusing on the identity construction and power relationships in peer groups Yang, Sooyeon, Chung, Hyeseung, Lee, Sunyoung, Ryu, Sanghee, Min, Byeonggon p.159-196

참고문헌 (56건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Applebee, A. N., & Langer, J. A. (2013). Writing instruction that works. New York: Teachers College Press. 미소장
2 Belcher, D. (2014). What we need and don’t need intercultural rhetoric for. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25, 59-67. 미소장
3 The Myth of the "Turn" in Contrastive Rhetoric 네이버 미소장
4 Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. 네이버 미소장
5 Choe, S. (2011). The actual situation of the high school composition education and the predicted problem of 2009 revised Korean language curriculum. Research on Writing, 13, 61-85. 미소장
6 Text structure of Korean speakers' argumentative essays in English 네이버 미소장
7 Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge. 미소장
8 New Directions in Contrastive Rhetoric 네이버 미소장
9 Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. 미소장
10 Denzin, N. K. (1970). The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. London: Butterworths. 미소장
11 Cross-Cultural Analysis of Student Writing: Beyond Discourses of Difference 네이버 미소장
12 Eggington, W. (1987). Written academic discourse in Korean: Implications for effective communication. In U. Connor, & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 texts (pp. 153-168). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 미소장
13 Foster, D., & Russell, D. R. (2002). Writing and learning in cross-national perspective. Urbana, IL: NCTE. 미소장
14 Gu, B. (2014). Four steps in composition jeolgu in Sino-Korean poetry. Journal of Korean Literature, 30, 265-292. 미소장
15 Discourse of international commercial arbitration: The case of Mainland China 네이버 미소장
16 Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state writing assessments control learning. New York: Teachers College Press. 미소장
17 At Last: The Focus on Form vs. Content in Teaching Writing 네이버 미소장
18 Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility. In U. Connor & R. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages (pp. 141-152). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 미소장
19 Hinds, J. (1990). Inductive, deductive, quasi-inductive: Expository writing in Japanese, Korean, Chinese, and Thai. In U. Connor, & A. Johns (Eds.), Coherence in writing (pp. 87-109). Alexandria, VA: TESOL. 미소장
20 Hoffman, J. V., Wilson, M., Martínez, R., & Sailors, M. (2011). Content analysis. In N. Duke, & M. Mallette (Eds.), Literacy research methodologies (2nd ed., pp. 28-49). New York: Guilford Press. 미소장
21 Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. 미소장
22 Hu, G., & Cao, F. (2011). Hedging and boosting in abstracts of applied linguistics articles. Journal of pragmatics, 43(11), 2795-2809. 미소장
23 문학 : 절구(絶句)의 개념과 양식적 특징 네이버 미소장
24 Genre and academic writing in the disciplines 네이버 미소장
25 Rhetorical patterns in L1 and L2 argumentative essays of Korean EFL students 소장
26 CULTURAL THOUGHT PATTERNS IN INTER‐CULTURAL EDUCATION 네이버 미소장
27 Kaplan, R. B. (1972). The anatomy of rhetoric. Philadelphia: Center for Curriculum Development. 미소장
28 Differences in structural tendencies between Japanese newspaper editorials and front-page columns: Focus on the location of the main topic 네이버 미소장
29 Influence of Cultural Norms and Collaborative Discussions on Children's Reflective Essays 네이버 미소장
30 Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 미소장
31 A Reevaluation of the Uniqueness of Japanese Written Discourse: Implications for Contrastive Rhetoric 네이버 미소장
32 An investigation of L1–L2 transfer in writing among Japanese university students: Implications for contrastive rhetoric 네이버 미소장
33 Japanese Culture Constructed by Discourses: Implications for Applied Linguistics Research and ELT 네이버 미소장
34 Multiple Perspectives on L1 and L2 Academic Literacy in Asia Pacific and Diaspora Contexts 네이버 미소장
35 The "Academic Literacies" Model: Theory and Applications 네이버 미소장
36 Lee, S. (1995). Syntactic, lexical, and rhetorical differences in English prose written by native speakers of English and by native speakers of Korean. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Tennessee, Knoxville 미소장
37 A Study of Korean and English Research Paper Introductions based on Swales' Move Analysis 소장
38 Twenty-Five Years of Contrastive Rhetoric: Text Analysis and Writing Pedagogies 네이버 미소장
39 Rhetorical education through writing instruction across cultures: A comparative analysis of select online instructional materials on argumentative writing 네이버 미소장
40 A multidimensional comparison of discourse organization in English and Chinese university students' argumentative writing 네이버 미소장
41 Cultural differences in the organization of research article introductions from the field of educational psychology: English and Chinese 네이버 미소장
42 Lunsford, K. J. (2012). Conducting research internationally. In L. Nickoson & M. P. Sheridan (Eds.), Writing Studies Research in Practice (pp. 220-230). Carbondale, IL: SIU Press. 미소장
43 The Challenges of Contrastive Discourse Analysis: Reflecting on a Study into the Influence of English on Students' Written Spanish on a Bilingual Education Program in Spain 네이버 미소장
44 The Authenticity of Writing Learning from 'Dasan & Yeonam' 네이버 미소장
45 Park, J. (2014). Exploring educational implications for writing education through the analysis of the transfer theory. Research on Writing, 21, 151-172. 미소장
46 A Content Analysis of Nine Literacy Journals, 2009-2014 네이버 미소장
47 Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 미소장
48 Using Contrastive Rhetoric in the ESL Classroom 네이버 미소장
49 Rhetorical patterns in Korean college students' English expository writings 소장
50 Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, UK: Sage. 미소장
51 Toulmin, S. (1958). The uses of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
52 Toulmin, S. (2003). The uses of argument (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
53 Valverde, G. A., Bianchi, L. J., Wolfe, R. G., Schmidt, W. H., & Houang, R. T. (2002). According to the book: Using TIMSS to investigation the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer. 미소장
54 Volosinov, V. I. (1986) Marxism and the Philosophy of Language. (L. Matejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1973) 미소장
55 The Organization of Justificatory Discourse in Interaction: A Comparison Within and Across Cultures 네이버 미소장
56 A Structure Analysis of English Argumentative Writings Written by Chinese and Korean EFL Learners 네이버 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차