본문바로가기

자료 카테고리

소장자료소장자료 공공정책정보공공정책정보 외부기관 자료외부기관 자료
전체 1
도서자료 0
학위논문 0
연속간행물·학술기사 1
멀티미디어 0
동영상 0
국회자료 0
특화자료 0

도서 앰블럼

전체 (0)
일반도서 (0)
E-BOOK (0)
고서 (0)
세미나자료 (0)
웹자료 (0)
전체 (0)
학위논문 (0)
전체 (1)
국내기사 (1)
국외기사 (0)
학술지·잡지 (0)
신문 (0)
전자저널 (0)
전체 (0)
오디오자료 (0)
전자매체 (0)
마이크로폼자료 (0)
지도/기타자료 (0)
전체 (0)
동영상자료 (0)
전체 (0)
외국법률번역DB (0)
국회회의록 (0)
국회의안정보 (0)
전체 (0)
표·그림DB (0)
지식공유 (0)

도서 앰블럼

전체 1
국내공공정책정보
국외공공정책정보
국회자료
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
지방자치단체 ()
공공기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
의회기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
국회의원정책자료 ()
입법기관자료 ()

검색결과

검색결과 (전체 1건)

검색결과제한

열기
내서재담기 야간이용신청목록담기(서울관) 한자 한글변환 목록으로 알림톡 발송 우편복사 목록담기 프린트
이 자료 추천하기 오류신고
MARC
기사명/저자명
디지털통상과 국제법의 발전 = Digital trade and the development of international law / 박노형, 정명현 인기도
발행사항
서울 : 大韓國際法學會, 2018.12.30
수록지명
國際法學會論叢 = The Korean journal of international law. 제63권 제4호 통권 제151호 (2018년 12월), p.197-216
자료실
[서울관] 정기간행물실(524호)  도서위치안내(서울관)
외부기관 원문
외부기관 원문
제어번호
KINX2019049502
주기사항
한국연구재단에서 제공한 KCI 등재학술(후보)지임

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차
국제사법재판소(ICJ)의 권고적 의견과 동의(consent)의 원칙 = Advisory opinions of the international court of justice and the principle of consent to judicial settlement : a review of written statements submitted for the proceedings on the Chagos Archipelago : 차고스(Chagos) 군도 사건에서 제출된 서면의견을 중심으로 황준식 p.309-337
국제법상 Lex ferenda = Lex ferenda in international law 박기갑 p.117-156
1877년 태정관 지령의 역사적·국제법적 쟁점 검토 = Rethinking historical and international legal issues on 1877 Dajokan directive : focus on the relations with the documents of Ulleungdo incident : 울릉도쟁계 관련 문서와의 연관성을 중심으로 최철영, 유미림 p.247-280
인공지능 시대의 도래와 국제법 = The advent of artificial intelligence and international law implications for the jurisprudence on state responsibility : 국가행위 귀속 문제를 중심으로 이재민 p.281-307
The changing structure and paradigm shift in international law= 국제법의 구조 변화 및 패러다임의 전환 Kim Boochan p.25-55
평화조약 내 영토조항에 관한 연구 = A comparative study on the provisions on territories in the peace treaty with Italy in 1947 and the peace treaty with Japan in 1951 : 대일 평화조약과 대이태리 평화조약을 중심으로 강병근 p.217-245
국제공동체의 근본이익 침해에 대한 국가책임의 추궁 = Invocation and implementation of the state responsibility for violations of the fundamental interests of the international community 김석현 p.157-196
WTO 분쟁해결체제 하의 선결적 항변에 관한 연구 = A study on preliminary objections under the WTO dispute settlement system 이주윤 p.365-401 원문보기 (음성지원, 국회도서관 방문 후 이용 가능 )
디지털통상과 국제법의 발전 = Digital trade and the development of international law 박노형, 정명현 p.197-216
국제 핵 비확산 체제의 맹점 및 개선방안 = Loopholes in the NPT regime and ways and means to plug them up : based on the lessons from the cases of Iran and N. Korea : 이란 및 북한의 경험을 중심으로 장동희 p.91-116
국제인도법상 무력충돌의 유형과 그 적용 = Classification of armed conflicts in international humanitarian law and its application 안준형 p.403-441
17세기말 「울릉도쟁계」 관련 조·일 교환공문(사본)의 증명력 = The legal status and evidentiary value of the Jukdo chronicle in international law and adjudication. 2, 국제재판에서의 입증책임·기준과 사서·사료의 증명력을 중심으로 박현진 p.57-89
국제법의 본질과 조약 해석에 관한 소고 = The nature of international law and treaty interpretation : with special focus on an interpretivist approach : 해석주의 법철학을 중심으로 박정원 p.339-364

참고문헌 (60건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )더보기

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 McKinsey Global Institute, Digital Globalization: The New Era of Global Flows, pp. 4, 10, 30-31, 77 (March 2016). 미소장
2 WTO, 2018 World Trade Report (2018). 미소장
3 산업통상자원부 통상교섭본부, 새로운 통상이야기 (2018) 미소장
4 WTO, Declaration on Global Electronic Commerce Adopted on 20 May 1998, WT/MIN(98)/DEC/2 (May 25, 1998). 미소장
5 WTO, Work Programme on Electronic Commerce Adopted by the General Council on 25 September 1998, WT/L/274 (September 30, 1998). 미소장
6 WTO에서의 전자상거래에 관한 활동, https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/ecom_e/ecom_e.htm. 미소장
7 WTO, Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce Initiative – Communication from the United States, JOB/GC/178, (April 12, 2018). 미소장
8 USITC, Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economies, Part 1, USITC Publication 4415 (July 2013) 미소장
9 USITC, Digital Trade in the U.S. and Global Economies, Part 2, USITC Publication 4485 (August 2014). 미소장
10 USITC, Global Digital Trade I: Market Opportunities and Key Foreign Trade Restrictions (2017.8). 미소장
11 USITC, News Release 17-065, Inv. No. 332-562 and 332-563, ‘Second and Third USITC Digital Trade Reports Launched’ (May 2, 2017), https://www.usitc.gov/press_room/news_release/2017/er0502ll764.htm. 미소장
12 Rafael F. Fefer, Shayerah Ilias Akhtar, & Wayne M. Morrison, Digital Trade and U.S. Trade Policy, CRS Report R44565 (2018.5.11.). 미소장
13 U.S. Department of Commerce, ‘Digital Economy Board of Advisors Membership Balance Plan’, (January 3, 2018), https://www.ntia.doc.gov/files/ntia/publications/deba_membership_balance_plan-1-3-2018.pdf. 미소장
14 Department of Commerce, ‘U.S. Strategy To Address Trade-Related Forced Localization Barriers Impacting the U.S. ICT Hardware Manufacturing Industry’, 83 Federal Register 15786 (April 12, 2018). 미소장
15 European Parliamentary Research Service, “Free flow of non-personal data in the European Union”, Briefing: EU Legislation in Progress, p. 1, (September 26, 2018). 미소장
16 European Parliament Press Release, Free flow of non-personal data: Parliament approves EU’s fifth freedom (2018.10.4.), http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20180926IPR14403/free-flow-of-non-personal-data-parliament-approves-eu-s-fifth-freedom. 미소장
17 European Council Press Release, Free flow of data: EU adopts new rules, (2018.11.10.) https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2018/11/09/free-flow-of-data-eu-adopts-new-rules/. 미소장
18 http://gss.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/zhengcefabu/201603/t20160324_1922968.html. 미소장
19 Mark Schaub, Chen Bing and Martyn Huckerby, “Further challenges in China cross-border e-commerce”, King & Wood Mallesons, (2016.4.20.). https://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/china-ecommerceretail-imported-goods-tax-circular-positive-list-category-20160413 미소장
20 Deborah Kay Elms, Evolving Digital and E-Commerce Trade Rules for Northeast Asia, KIEP, 2016. 미소장
21 Mark Schaub and Chen Beng, “Keep Calm and Carry On”: Keeping up with China’s changing rules for cross-border e-commerce, King & Wood Mallesons, (2016.5.9.). https://www.kwm.com/en/au/knowledge/insights/china-changing-rules-cross-border-ecommerce-trade-20160510. 미소장
22 중국 사이버안전법 제1조 및 제2조. 미소장
23 Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People’s Republic of China, International Strategy of Cooperation on Cyberspace (translation), http://www.xinhuanet.com//english/china/2017-03/01/c_136094371_5.htm. 미소장
24 China International Strategy of Cooperation on Cyberspace (2017.3.1.) . 미소장
25 CPTPP 미소장
26 데이터무역 국제규범의 출범 : TPP의 중요한 의의 소장
27 GOV.UK, ‘Japan will "spare no effort to support the UK" in joining the CPTPP’ (July 31, 2018), https://www.gov.uk/government/news/japan-will-spare-no-effort-to-support-the-uk-in-joining-the-cptpp 미소장
28 Ana Swanson, “Trump Proposes Rejoining Trans-Pacific Partnership“, New York Times, (April 12, 2018), https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/12/us/politics/trump-trans-pacific-partnership.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news. 미소장
29 USTR, 2018 Trade Policy Agenda and 2017 Annual Report, (March 2018). 미소장
30 WTO, Members debate cyber security and chemicals at technical barriers to trade committee, 14-15 June 2017, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news17_e/tbt_20jun17_e.htm 미소장
31 WTO, Minutes of the Meeting of 14-15 June 2017, G/TBT/M/72 (September 25, 2017) 미소장
32 WTO, Report of the Meeting held on 2 March 2018: Note by the Secretariat, S/C/M/134 (April 5, 2018). 미소장
33 WTO, Communication from the United States - Measures Adopted and under Development by China Relating to Its Cybersecurity Law, S/C/W/374 (September 26, 2017). 미소장
34 Elsa B. Kania, China’s Quantum Future: Xi's Quest to Build a High-Tech Superpower, Foreign Affairs (September 26, 2018), https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-09-26/chinas-quantum-future?cid=int-now&pgtype=top 미소장
35 Adam Segal, When China Rules the Web: Technology in Service of the State, Foreign Affairs (September 26, 2018), https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2018-09-26/chinas-quantumfuture?cid=int-now&pgtype=top 미소장
36 David Meyer, Trump Has New Plans to Keep China Away from U.S. Tech.: Here's What You Need to Know, Fortune (June 25, 2018), http://fortune.com/2018/06/25/ donaldtrump-china-technology-export-controls-investment/ 미소장
37 Andy Puzder, China started the trade war, Trump is just trying to end it, Fox News (July 28, 2018), http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2018/07/28/china-startedtrade-war-trump-is-just-trying-to-end-it.html. 미소장
38 WTO, Report of the Meeting held on 6 October 2017: Note by the Secretariat, S/C/M/133, (November 6, 2017) 미소장
39 WTO, Report of the Meeting held on 30 May 2018: Note by the Secretariat, S/C/M/135 (July 11, 2018) 미소장
40 WTO News, ‘Poorest countries call for review of preferential access for exporters of services’, https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news18_e/serv_10oct18_e.htm. 미소장
41 WTO, Minutes of the Meeting of 29-30 March 2017, G/TBT/M/71 (June 2, 2017) 미소장
42 WTO, Minutes of the Meeting of 21-22 March 2018, G/TBT/M/74 (May 22, 2018). 미소장
43 WTO, Joint Statement on Electronic Commerce dated 13 December 2017, WT/MIN(17)/60. 미소장
44 WTO, “Removing Cyberspace Trade Barriers: Towards a Digital Trade Environment with Reciprocally Equal Access: Non-Paper from the Separate Customs Territory of Taiwan, Penghu, Kinmen and Matsu”, (February 16, 2018), JOB/GC/170, JOB/CTG/12, JOB/SERV/277, JOB/IP/29, JOB/DEV/53 미소장
45 Xinhua, China Internet regulator says cyber security law not a trade barrier, (May 31, 2017), http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2017-05/31/content_29563471.htm. 미소장
46 National Counterintelligence and Security Center, Foreign Economic Espionage in Cyberspace (2018). 미소장
47 The Council of Economic Advisers, The Cost of Malicious Cyber Activity to the U.S. Economy, p. 1 (February 2018). 미소장
48 CSIS, Economic Impact of Cybercrime— No Slowing Down, p. 16 (February 2018). 미소장
49 David E. Sanger, “Chinese Curb Cyberattacks on U.S. Interests, Report Finds,” New York Times, (June 20, 2016), https://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/21/us/politics/china-us-cyber-spying.html. 미소장
50 The United States Department of Justice, U.S. Charges Five Chinese Military Hackers for Cyber Espionage Against U.S. Corporations and a Labor Organization for Commercial Advantage: First Time Criminal Charges Are Filed Against Known State Actors for Hacking, (May 19, 2014), https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/uscharges-five-chinese-military-hackers-cyber-espionage-against-us-corporations-and-labor 미소장
51 Tal Kopan, U.S. charges China with hacking, Politico, (May 19, 2014), https://www.politico.com/story/2014/05/ chinesecomputer-hacking-us-charges-espionage-military-eric-holder-106825 미소장
52 Katie Bo Williams, US authorities name Chinese firms involved in hacks, The Hill, (October 8, 2015), https://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/256330-us-authorities-name-chinese-firms-involved-in-military-hacks. 미소장
53 Fireeye iSight Intelligence, Redline Drawn: China Recalculates Its Use of Cyber Espionage (June 2016). 미소장
54 Dr. Adam Segal, Dr. Samantha Hoffman, Fergus Hanson and Tom Uren, Hacking for Cash: Is China still stealing Western IP?, Report No.2/2018, International Cyber Policy Centre (2018). 미소장
55 Freeze C (2016) Canada, China to discuss accord on cybersecurity, The Globe and Mail, http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/canada-chi- na-to-discuss-accord-oncybersecurity/article32068707/ 미소장
56 “G20 Leaders’ Communiqué, Antalya Summit,” the G20, http://www.mofa.go.jp/files/000111117.pdf. 미소장
57 Director of National Intelligence, World Threat Assessment of the U.S. Intelligence Community, p. 1 (May 11, 2017). 미소장
58 Kevin L. Kearns, U.S. Steel’s costly battle against China’s cyber-hacking, The Hill, (March 13, 2017), https://thehill.com/blogs/pundits-blog/technology/323738-us-steels-costly-battle-against-chinas-cyber-hacking 미소장
59 United States Steel Corporation, United States Steel Corporation Announces Action On Section 337 Case, (February 15, 2017), http://uss.mediaroom.com/index.php?s=32722&item=137111. 미소장
60 White House, Presidential Memorandum on the Actions by the United States Related to the Section 301 Investigation, issued on March 22, 2018, https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/presidentialmemorandum-actions-united-states-related-section-301-investigation/. 미소장
내서재담기 야간이용신청목록담기(서울관) 한자 한글변환 목록으로 알림톡 발송 우편복사 목록담기 프린트

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차
연속간행물 팝업 열기 연속간행물 팝업 열기