권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
This paper purposes to indicate that the affirmative action adopted to increase multicultural society rates in Korean labor market has lost the original meaning of its own, through examining the examples of other countries which had employed affirmative action before Korea did and reviewing scholarly debates about instrumentalizing affirmative action. Affirmative Action is more controversial or more divisive than any other issues in America. Recently the Supreme Court of the United States sent Fisher v. Texas At Austin back to the lower court for additional review. The Court held that because the Fifth Circuit did not hold the University to the demanding burden of strict scrutiny articulated in Grutter and Bakke, its decision affirming the District Court’s grant of summary judgment to University was incorrect. Affirmative action is originally enacted to reward people who suffered inequality that had been historically reproduced by the discrimination in the past; however, this meaning of compensatory justice has tended to disappear in the process of adopting and applying it in Korean society. Especially, in the America. where the strong effect of neoliberalism on politics, economy and society has existed, affirmative action has been replaced by the instrumental affirmative action or the emphasis on diversity. Affirmative action in Korea has been through similar changes. Also, the primary focus of this paper is on government affirmative action efforts.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 대학01
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.