본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

This paper investigates the online processing of Korean null and overt pronouns in the subject position in relation to their preference towards subject and object antecedents. Thirty-four native Korean speakers participated in a self-paced reading task, in which they read Korean sentences containing two kinds of pronouns – null and overt pronouns. We manipulated the type of pronoun (null vs. overt) in the subject position and whether the pronoun refers to the subject or the object antecedent of the preceding sentence. The results show that the null pronoun has a clear preference for the subject antecedent while the overt pronoun does not have a strong preference with regard to the position of the antecedent. This finding suggests that the referential preferences of Korean null and overt pronouns challenge the predictions of the Position of Antecedent Hypothesis (PAH; Carminati 2002), originally proposed for the behavior of Italian null and overt pronouns.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
현대중국어 '给'의 경동사 기능에 관한 소고(小考) = A preliminary study on the light verb function of Chinese gei 김윤정 p. 1-20

'혐오'의 공기 경향성과 의미적 운율 : Co-occurrence and semantic prosody of the lexical item ‘Hyem-o (hatred/disgust)’ : focused on online news article corpus / 뉴스 기사문 말뭉치를 중심으로 이수진 p. 1-24

중국어 말차례 시작지점에 분포하는 언어요소의 실제 = Turn-initial elements in Mandarin conversations 이지원 p. 1-24

(A) case study of discourse strategies by anchors in political news interviews Soo-Yeon Jang p. 1-21

Inter-physio constructions in English and the choice of prepositions : a semantic approach Keeseok Cho p. 1-21

Online resolution of subject pronouns in Korean Jinsun Choe p. 1-21

참고문헌 (34건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Alonso-Ovalle, Luis, Susana Fernández-Solera, Lyn Frazier and Charles Clifton, Jr. 2002. Null vs. overt pronouns and the topic-focus articulation in Spanish. Rivista di Linguistica 14:2, 151-169. 미소장
2 Burkhardt, Petra, Maria M. Piñango and Sergey Avrutin. 2003. Real-time pronominal interpretation: The case of Dutch & English. Poster presented at CUNY, Boston, March 27-29. 미소장
3 Carminati, Maria Nella. 2002. The processing of Italian subject pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts. 미소장
4 Carminati, Maria Nella. 2005. Processing reflexes of the feature hierarchy (person > number > gender)and implications for linguistic theory. Lingua 115, 259-285. 미소장
5 Choe, Jinsun. 2021. Interpretation and processing of null and overt pronouns in Korean. Discourse and Cognition 28:1, 289-308. 미소장
6 Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht, Holland: Foris Publications. 미소장
7 Crawley, Rosalind A., Rosemary J. Stevenson and David Kleinman. 1990. The use of heuristic strategies in the interpretation of pronouns. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 19:4, 245-264. 미소장
8 Ferreira, Fernanda, and Charles Clifton Jr. 1986. The independence of syntactic processing. Journal of Memory and Language 25, 348-368. 미소장
9 Filiaci, Francesca, Antonella Sorace, and Manuel Carreiras. 2013. Anaphoric biases of null and overt subjects in Italian and Spanish: A cross-linguistic comparison. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 29:7, 825-843. 미소장
10 Frana, Ilaria. 2007. The role of discourse prominence in the resolution of referential ambiguities. Evidence from co-reference in Italian. UMOP 37: Semantics and Processing. 미소장
11 Frazier, Lyn and Charles Clifton. 2000. On bound variable interpretations: The LF-only hypothesis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 29:2, 125-139. 미소장
12 Han, Chung-hye, Dennis Ryan Storoshenko, Betty Hei Man Leung and Kyeong-min Kim. 2015. The time course of long-distance anaphor processing in Korean. Korean Linguistics 17:1, 1-32. 미소장
13 Han, Na-Rae. 2006. Korean zero pronouns: Analysis and resolution. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania. 미소장
14 Hong, Minpyo. 2002. A review on zero anaphora resolution theories in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 29, 167-186. 미소장
15 Kim, Lucy Kyoungsook. 2009. The role of Korean honorific agreement in null subject resolution. M.A. thesis. University of Southern California. 미소장
16 Kim, Lucy Kyoungsook, and Elsi Kaiser. 2009. Effects of honorific agreement on null subject interpretation in Korean. Current issues in linguistic interfaces 1, ed. Y.-S. Kang et al., 303-318. Proceedings of the 2009 Seoul International Conference on Linguistic Interfaces (SICOLI 2009). Hankookmunhwasa: S. Korea. 미소장
17 Kim, Mi-Young. 2003. An optimality approach to the referential interpretation of zero anaphora in Korean. Ph.D. dissertation. Seoul National University. 미소장
18 Kuno, Susumu. 1972. Functional sentence perspective: A case study from Japanese and English. Linguistic Inquiry 3:3, 269-320. 미소장
19 Kweon, Soo-Ok. 2011. Processing of null and overt pronoun subject in ambiguous sentences in Korean. International Journal of Linguistics 3:1, 1-13. 미소장
20 Kweon, Soo-Ok. 2012. Processing null and overt pronoun subject at different proficiency levels in Korean as a second language. Foreign Languages Education 19:1, 1-20. 미소장
21 Kwon, Nayoung and Patrick Sturt. 2013. Null pronominal (pro) resolution in Korean, a discourse oriented language. Language and Cognitive Processes 28:3, 377-387. 미소장
22 Light, Leah L. and Janet L. Capps. 1986. Comprehension of pronouns in young and older adults. Developmental Psychology 22, 580-585. 미소장
23 Mayol, Laia. 2010. Refining salience and the position of antecedent hypothesis: A study of Catalan pronouns. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium 16:1, 125-136. 미소장
24 Mayol, Laia, and Robin Clark. 2010. Pronouns in Catalan: Games of partial information and the use of linguistic resources. Journal of Pragmatics 42:3: 781-799. 미소장
25 Park, Myung-Kwan, Euiyon Cho, and Wonil Chung. 2015. Backward antecedent search of the null subject pronominal (pro) in Korean: An ERP study. Language Research 51:3, 537-568. 미소장
26 Piñango, Maria M., Petra Burkhardt, Dina Brun and Sergey Avrutin. 2001. Pronominal interpretation: Implications for the architecture of the sentence processing system. SEMPRO-2001: Cognitive plausible models of semantic processing, Edinburgh, July 31. 미소장
27 Reuland, Eric. 2001. Primitives of binding. Linguistic Inquiry 32, 439-492. 미소장
28 Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 1996. Constraints on subjects: An optimality theoretic analysis. Ph.D. dissertation. Rutgers University. 미소장
29 Sanford, Anthony J. and Simon C. Garrod. 1994. Selective processing in text understanding. The handbook of psycholinguistics, ed. by Gernsbacher, M., 699-719. New York: Wiley. 미소장
30 Sorace, Antonella and Francesca Filiaci. 2006. Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22:3, 339-368. 미소장
31 Tachibana, Hisaka. 2016. Anaphora resolution in Japanese. Ph.D. dissertation. San Diego State University. 미소장
32 Torregrossa, Jacopo, Christiane Bongartz, and Ianthi Maria Tsimpli. 2015. Testing accessibility: A cross-linguistic comparison of the syntax of referring expressions. Proceedings of the 89th Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America 6:29. 미소장
33 Torregrossa, Jacopo, Maria Andreou, and Christiane M. Bongartz. 2020. Variation in the use and interpretation of null subjects: A view from Greek and Italian. Glossa: A journal of general linguistics 5(1):95, 1-28. 미소장
34 Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The informational component. New York: Garland. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차