본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

The Sino-Tibetan Language Family has a typical quantifier system, and the use of abundant quantifiers is one of the most important features that distinguish Chinese from other language types. Compared with Chinese, there are fewer verb quantifiers in Korean quantifiers. Due to the influence of SOV basic word order, there are significant differences in the basic syntactic positions of the verb measure words or phrases between Korean and Chinese.

Firstly, focusing on the eight verb measure words listed in the General Curriculum Outline for International Chinese Language Teaching, which are “次(Ci), 下(Xia), 遍(Bian), 趟(Tang), 回(Hui), 场(Chang), 顿(Dun) and 番(Fan)”, and through data statistics from the HSK Dynamic Composition Corpus, a comprehensive investigation is conducted on the verb measure words error of Korean learners. It is noteworthy that in the interlanguage corpus, except for “次(Ci)” and “一下(YiXia)”, the frequency of the use of other verb measure words is quite low, and learners basically adopt the “avoidance” strategy.

This paper mainly takes the verb measure words grammar in the current Chinese language series textbooks in Korea as the research object. It analyzes whether the arrangement of verb measure words in the textbooks can help Korean learners overcome existing error and “avoidance” phenomena.

This article comprehensively analyzes the form and frequency of the verb measure words in the texts of the eight series of textbooks, the number, and the pertinence of the notes and exercises. From this, the following characteristics are summarized:

First, the forms of verb measure words in the text are typical and single. Compared with the translated textbooks, the repetition rate of verb measure words in the native textbooks is lower, and the phenomenon that the repetition distance is greater than 5 lessons is more obvious. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve the effect of concentrating and strengthening memory. Second, there are generally few examples of sentences and exercises in the after-class annotations of the two types of textbooks. There is no obvious pertinence for Korean learners to overcome errors. Third, compared with the translation-based textbooks, the repetition rate of verb measure words and the number of examples, sentences, and exercises in the local-type textbooks are slightly increased. Still, there is an obvious imbalance between the textbooks.

In summary, based on the analysis of the characteristics of Korean learners’ errors in learning verb measure words, this article examines the arrangement of verb measure words grammar in eight series of Chinese language textbooks in Korea, identifies some problem points, and provides a corresponding reference for the future compilation of local textbooks.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
《华严石经》残片#10670上的残字考释 = Interpretation of broken letters in the piece #10670 of Huayan Shijing 梁导喜 p. 1-15

陶渊明<咏贫士>中"守道"与"乐道"研究 = A study on "stick to Tao" and "glad to Tao" in Tao Yuanming's Songs on the Poor : centered on the characters : 以人物为中心 汪翠 p. 17-35

'癖'의 즐거움 = On the pleasures of 'Pi(癖)' : a study on major pastimes of the literati of the Song Dynasty : 宋代 문인의 취미 양상 고찰 安芮璿 p. 37-62

《西游记》空间背景的构成方式及其意义 = The significance of the spatial background and composition method in the Journey to The West(≪西游记≫) : focus on 'the eight-one sufferings' : 以"八十一难"为中心 洪性楚 p. 63-87

류헝 소설 속 존재의 운명 = The fate of being in Liu Heng's novel : 소설 《黑的雪》를 중심으로 李새미 p. 89-110

韩国现行汉语系列教材中的动量词语法项目考察 = A study on the verb measure words in current Chinese textbooks in Korea 王帅 p. 111-133

《殷虛文字丙編》051~060譯註 = Translation and annotation of fascicle three of inscriptions from the Yin Ruins(≪殷虛文字丙編≫)051∼060 金赫 p. 135-161

<尊德義> 譯註 = A textual interpretation of bamboo script on the Zun Deyi(<尊德義>) : from 1st to 39th bamboo pieces of the the Guodian Chu Jian(<郭店楚简>) version 姜信碩 p. 163-194

참고문헌 (31건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 김세미(2020)，＜한국인 학습자의 전용동량사 구문 사용에 나타난 오류분석＞，≪인문사회과학연구≫ 제20권 1，85-114. 미소장
2 김영민(2009)，＜현대중국어 ‘V+一下’의 의미기능 연구＞，≪중국어문학논집≫ 제54호，213-232. 미소장
3 김태순 외(2019)，≪집중중국어≫，서울：동양북스. 미소장
4 박정구⋅백은희(2021)，≪다락원중국어마스터≫，파주：다락원. 미소장
5 이강재 외(2019)，≪중국어의신≫，서울：동양북스. 미소장
6 JRC중국어연구소(2007)，≪맛있는중국어≫，서울：맛있는books. 미소장
7 王 帅(2022)，＜语言类型学视角下的“Num+次”错序偏误考察—以韩语母语者为中心＞，≪중국어문논총≫ 제111집，117-145. 미소장
8 崔永华(2012)，≪新概念汉语≫，임대근 편역(2016)，≪신개념중국어≫，파주: 다락원. 미소장
9 车 慧(2012)，＜韩国留学生学习汉语动量短语的偏误分析＞，≪语言文字学术研究≫ 第6期，30-31. 미소장
10 戴桂芙 等(1996)，≪汉语口语≫，동양북스 편역(2017)，≪신한어구어≫，서울: 동양북스. 미소장
11 耿 直(2017)，＜≪博雅汉语≫初级阶段教材词汇重现率研究＞，≪国际汉语教育≫ 第4期，100-107. 미소장
12 郭先珍(2002)，≪现代汉语量词用法词典≫，北京：语文出版社. 미소장
13 姜丽萍(2014)，≪HSK标准教程≫，이준복 외 편역(2017)，≪표준중국어≫，파주: 다락원. 미소장
14 康艳红ㆍ董明(2005)，＜初级对外汉语教材的词汇重现率研究＞，≪语言文字应用≫ 第4期，94-99. 미소장
15 李 泉⋅宫雪(2015)，＜通用型、区域型、语别型、国别型―谈国际汉语教材的多元化＞，≪汉语学习≫ 第1期，76-84. 미소장
16 李在恩(2012)，＜韩国留学生习得汉语动量词的偏误研究＞，黑龙江大学硕士学位论文. 미소장
17 刘 珣(1982)，＜试谈基础汉语教科书的编写原则＞，≪语言教学与研究≫ 第4期，64-75. 미소장
18 柳燕梅(2002)，＜生词重现率对欧美学生汉语词汇学习的影响＞，≪语言教学与研究≫ 第5期，59-63. 미소장
19 鲁健骥(1993)，＜中介语研究中的几个问题＞，≪语言文字应用≫ 第1期，21-25. 미소장
20 鲁健骥(1994)，＜外国人学汉语的语法偏误分析＞，≪语言教学与研究≫ 第1期，49-64. 미소장
21 马箭飞⋅苏英霞 외(1999)，≪汉语口语速成≫，변형우 외 편역(2000)，≪신공략중국어≫, 파주: 다락원. 미소장
22 马学良(2003)，≪汉藏语概论≫，北京：民族出版社. 미소장
23 石毓智(2006)，≪语法化的动因与机制≫，北京：北京大学出版社. 미소장
24 王海峰(2011)，≪国别化：对韩汉语教学法≫，北京：北京大学出版社. 미소장
25 王欢欢(2012)，＜留学生使用频率较高的动量词及使用偏误分析＞，黑龙江大学硕士学位论文. 미소장
26 徐 丹⋅傅京起(2011)，＜量词及其类型学考察＞，≪语言科学≫第10卷6，561-573. 미소장
27 张伯江⋅方梅(1996)，≪汉语功能语法研究≫，南昌：江西教育出版社. 미소장
28 张瑞华(2003)，＜论语言环境与词汇学习＞，≪北京第二外国语学院学报≫ 第4期，1-4. 미소장
29 Adjemian，Christian(1976)，On the Nature of Interlanguage Systems，Language Learning 26(2)，297-320. 미소장
30 Lewis，Michael(1993)，The Lexical Approach，Hove：Language Teaching Publications. 미소장
31 Schmidt. R. W. Attention(2001)，Cognition and Second Language Instruction，Cambridge：Cambridge University Press. 미소장

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차