본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

초록보기

This study aims to investigate how speakers of a language with a relatively fixed word order learn scrambled order in L2. To this end, we conducted a naturalness rating task accompanied by a picture-writing task in Korean SOV (canonical order) and OSV (scrambled order) sentences for L1 English speakers learning Korean. Based on the Full Transfer/Full Access (FTFA) acquisition model (Schwartz and Sprouse 1996), we explored three parameters associated with the OSV order to determine whether and how L1 transfer is affected by different representational levels of each of these parameters: (i) the Head Directionality Parameter and (ii) the Multiple-Specifier Parameter are related to the grammar-internal domain (syntax), while (iii) the Given-before-New parameter is related to the grammar-external domain (discourse). The results show that for the grammar-internal parameters ((i) and (ii)), L2 learners are restructuring their interlanguage grammar towards the L2 grammar by accessing UG, supporting the FTFA hypothesis. On the other hand, for the grammar-external parameter (iii), our results are compatible with the hypothesis that given-before-new (discourse) knowledge is learned by accessing UG without L1 transfer. These results may imply that internal syntactic knowledge is acquired first, but external discourse constraints related to discourse are acquired later.

참고문헌 (55건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Almor, Amit. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106, 748-765. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.106.4.748 미소장
2 Almor, Amit., Veena A. Nair, Timothy W. Boiteau, and Jennifer MC Vendemia. 2017. The N400 in processing repeated name and pronoun anaphors in sentences and discourse. Brain and Language 173, 52-66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.06.003 미소장
3 Antonova-Ünlü, Elena. 2015. Testing the interface hypothesis: The evidence from fossilized errors in the use of Turkish case markers. Dilbilim Araştırmaları Dergisi 26, 1-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18492/da.99838 미소장
4 Baayen, R. Harald, Douglas J. Davidson, and Douglas M. Bates. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 594, 390-412. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 미소장
5 Baker, Mark. 2001.The atoms of language: The mind's hidden rules of grammar. Basic books. 미소장
6 Bates, Douglas, Martin Mächler, Ben Bolker, and Steve Walker. 2015. Fitting linear mixedeffects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 671, 1-48. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 미소장
7 Birner, Betty J., and Gregory L. Ward.1998. Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Philadelphia: Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/slcs.40 미소장
8 Birner, Betty J., and Gregory L. 2019. The interaction of topicalization and left-dislocation in English. Anglophonia. French Journal of English Linguistics 28. DOI:https://doi.org/10.4000/anglophonia.2801 미소장
9 Cho, Jai-Hyoung. 1994. Scrambling in Korean: Crossover, reconstruction and binding theory. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut. 미소장
10 Cho, Jai-Hyoung. 1996. Reconstruction effects and intermediate A-position. Studies in Generative Grammar 6, 257-279. 미소장
11 Choe, Jinsun. 2022. Online resolution of subject pronouns in Korean. Discourse and Cognition, 29-1, 113-133. DOI: 10.15718/discog.2022.29.1.113 미소장
12 Choi, Hye-Won. 1996. Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Ph.D. dissertation. Stanford university. 미소장
13 Choi, Hye-Won. 1999. Optimizing structure in context: Scrambling and information structure. Stanford, California: CSLI Publications. 미소장
14 Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 미소장
15 Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 미소장
16 Chomsky, Noam., Howard Lasnik. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 83, 425-504. 미소장
17 Clark, Herbert H., and Eve V. Clark. 1977. Psychology and language: An introduction to psycholinguistics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 미소장
18 De Marneffe, Marie-Catherine, Scott Grimm, Inbal Arnon, Susannah Kirby, and Joan Bresnan. 2012. A statistical model of the grammatical choices in child production of dative sentences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.542651 미소장
19 Gollan, Tamar H., Gali H. Weissberger, Elin Runnqvist, Rosa I. Montoya, and Cynthia M. Cera. 2012. Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A multilingual naming test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 594-615. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728911000332 미소장
20 Gordon, Peter C., Barbara J. Grosz, and Laura A. Gilliom. 1993. Pronouns, names, and the centering of attention in discourse. Cognitive Science 173, 311-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1703_1 미소장
21 Gordon, Peter C., and Kimberly A. Scearce. 1995. Pronominalization and discourse coherence, discourse structure and pronoun interpretation. Memory and Cognition 233, 313-323. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197233 미소장
22 Grewendorf, Günther, and Joachim Sabel. 1999. Scrambling in German and Japanese:Adjunction versus multiple specifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 17, 1-65. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006068326583 미소장
23 Gropen, Jess, Steven Pinker, Michelle Hollander, Richard Goldberg, and Ronald Wilson. 1989. The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language 65, 203–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/415332 미소장
24 Gundel, Jeanette Marie. 1974. The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. 미소장
25 Halliday, Michael. A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part II. Journal of Linguistics 3, 199–244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226700016613 미소장
26 Hopp, Holger. 2009. The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on- line performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 124, 463-483. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728909990253 미소장
27 Ionin, Tania, Heejeong Ko, and Kenneth Wexler. 2004. Article semantics in L2 acquisition:The role of specificity. Language Acquisition 121, 3-69. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327817la1201_2 미소장
28 Jackson, Kyuseek Hwang. 2008. The effect of information structure on Korean scrambling. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Hawai‘i. 미소장
29 Jung, Yeun-Jin. 2002. Scrambling, edge effects and A/A'-distinction. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 10, 41-64. 미소장
30 Kaiser, Elsi., and John C. Trueswell. 2004. The role of discourse context in the processing of a flexible word-order language. Cognition 942, 113-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.01.002 미소장
31 Kim, Alan Hyun-Oak. 1985. The grammar of focus in Korean syntax and its typological implications. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Sothern California. 미소장
32 Kim, Dae-Bin. 1995. Non specificity and scrambling. Studies in Generative Grammar 5:199- 238. 미소장
33 Kim, Rhang-Hye-Yun. 2003. Scrambling and minimalist program. Studies in Generative Grammar 13, 3-19. 미소장
34 Ko, Heejeong. 2018. Scrambling in Korean syntax. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.243 미소장
35 Lee, Young-Suk. 1993. Scrambling as case-driven obligatory movement. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pennsylvania. 미소장
36 Lee, Young-Suk. 1994. Scrambling as case-driven movement. Studies in Generative Grammar 4, 495- 533. 미소장
37 Lee, Hyun Sook. 2022. From Time to Cause: With Respect to Now. Discourse and Cognition, 29-4, 89-106. DOI: 10.15718/discog.2022.29.4.89 미소장
38 Lee, Wonbin and Sungeun Cho. 2003. Argument scrambling and object shift. Studies in Generative Grammar 13, 39-59. 미소장
39 Lefebvre, Claire. 1998. Creole genesis and the acquisition of grammar: The case of Haitian creole. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
40 Massery, Laurie A., and Claudio Fuentes. 2014. Morphological variability at the morphosyntactic/semantic interface: Difficulty with epistemic modality in L2Spanish. Morphological variability in L2. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics 165, 46-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.165.1.03mas 미소장
41 Mykhaylyk, Roksolana, Yulia Rodina, and Merete Anderssen. 2013. Ditransitive constructions in Russian and Ukrainian: Effect of givenness on word order. Lingua 137, 271-289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.001 미소장
42 Prince, Ellen. F. 1992. The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness, and information status. Discourse description: Diverse analyses of a fundraising text, eds. by S. Thompson & W. Mann, 295–325. Armsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.16.12pri 미소장
43 Schwartz, Bonnie D., and Rex Sprouse. 1996. L2 cognitive states and the full transfer/full access model. Second Language Research 12, 40-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200103 미소장
44 Serratrice, Ludovica, Antonella Sorace, Francesca Filiaci, and Michela Baldo. 2011. Pronominal objects in English–Italian and Spanish–Italian bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics 33, 725–51. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716411000543 미소장
45 Slabakova, Roumyana, Paula Kempchinsky, and Jason Rothman. 2012. Clitic-doubled left dislocation and focus fronting in L2 Spanish: A case of successful acquisition at the syntax–discourse interface. Second Language Research 28, 319-343. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312447612 미소장
46 Skopeteas, Stavros, and Gisbert Fanselow. 2009. Effects of givenness and constraints on free word order. Information structure: Theoretical, typological, and experimental perspectives, eds. by Malte Zimmermann and Caroline Féry, 307-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570959.003.0013 미소장
47 Son, Gwangrak. 2003. Traces of wh-scrambling. Studies in Generative Grammar 13, 99-118. 미소장
48 Sorace, Antonella. 2011. Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 1–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.01sor 미소장
49 Sprouse, Rex A. 2006. Full transfer and relexification: Second language acquisition and creole genesis. L2 acquisition and Creole genesis: Dialogues, eds. by Lefebvre, C. Jourdan and L. White, 169–181. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 미소장
50 Sprouse, Rex A. 2011. The interface hypothesis and full transfer/full access/full parse: A brief comparison. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1, 97-100. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.1.1.16spr 미소장
51 Takahashi, Shoichi, and Sarah Hulsey. 2009. Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/Ādistinction. Linguistic Inquiry 40, 387-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.3.387 미소장
52 Vainikka, Anne, and Martha Young-Scholten. 1996. The early stages in adult L2 syntax:Additional evidence from Romance speakers. Second Language Research 122, 140-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/026765839601200202 미소장
53 Ward, Gregory, Betty J. Birner, and Elsi Kaiser. 2017. Pragmatics and information structure. The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Yan Huang, 567–589. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 미소장
54 White, Lydia. 1992. Long and short verb movement in second language acquisition. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 37, 273-286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/s0008413100021988 미소장
55 White, Lydia. 2000. Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. Second language acquisition and linguistic theory, ed. by John Archibald, 130-155. Hoboken, NJ:Wiley-Blackwell. 미소장