본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

초록보기

The nominal (often called N′) ellipsis construction in English includes an understood material other than the remaining determiner. This elliptical NP tends to occur in contexts where its antecedent exhibits a similar or parallel structure. Popular analyses have derived such a construction with the postulation of the unexpressed materials and deletion operations, referring to the linguistic antecedent. However, our empirical investigation reveals a significant number of attested examples where the understood head noun refers to a discourse correlate, challenging such structure-based and movement operations. In this paper, based on such an empirical observation, we suggest a construction based analysis that allows us to refer to the inherently anaphoric (or deictic) or contextually anaphoric correlate of the understood head. This direction brings about a wider coverage of the empirical data.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
Some acoustic and articulatory characteristics of the three diphthongal vowels with /w/ in speech of young Seoul Korean speakers Dae-yong Lee, Jiyeon Song, Sahyang Kim, Taehong Cho p. 1-26

Native listeners’ perceptual assessments of native and foreign-accented speech and their associations with various speech properties Jieun Lee, Dong Jin Kim, Hanyong Park p. 27-63

Contextual anaphora relations in English nominal ellipsis Seulkee Park, Jong-Bok Kim, Eunjeong Oh p. 65-90

(The) timing of XP ellipsis is not fixed : evidence from English Dongwoo Park p. 91-108

Number in (in)definite contexts : the case study of Korean Kyumin Kim, Seong Eun Park p. 109-134

On the existence of Korean degree what-exclamatives Okgi Kim p. 135-168

Categorical and gradient effects in segmental deletion : the case study of /w/-deletion in Seoul Korean Soohyun Kwon p. 169-189

참고문헌 (32건) : 자료제공( 네이버학술정보 )

참고문헌 목록에 대한 테이블로 번호, 참고문헌, 국회도서관 소장유무로 구성되어 있습니다.
번호 참고문헌 국회도서관 소장유무
1 Abney, Steven P. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect. PhD Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 미소장
2 Bouchard, Denis. 2002. Adjectives, number and interfaces: Why languages vary. North Holland:Elsevier. 미소장
3 Corver, Norbert and Marjo Van Koppen. 2005. Microvariation and ellipsis in the wat voor-construction. A handout from Sounds of Silence Workshop. Tilburg University. October 19-22. 미소장
4 Davies, Mark. 2008-. The Corpus of Contemporary American English. Available online at https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/. 미소장
5 Eguren, Luis. 2010. Contrastive focus and nominal ellipsis in Spanish. Lingua 120(2): 435-457. 미소장
6 Elbourne, Paul. 2008. Ellipsis sites as definite descriptions. Linguistic Inquiry 39(2): 191-220. 미소장
7 Giannakidou, Anastasia and Melita Stavrou. 1999. Nominalization and ellipsis in the Greek DP. The Linguistic Review 16(4): 195-332. 미소장
8 Günther, Christine. 2012. Noun ellipsis in English: Adjectival modifiers and the role of context. English Language & Linguistics 15(2): 279-301. 미소장
9 Günther, Christine. 2013. The elliptical noun phrase in English: Structure and use. New York;London: Routledge. 미소장
10 Hankamer, Jorge and Ivan Sag. 1976. Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 7(3): 391-428. 미소장
11 Jackendoff, Ray S. 1972. Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 미소장
12 Khullar, Payal, Kushal Majmundar, and Manish Shrivastava. 2020. NoEl: An annotated corpus fornoun ellipsis in English. In Nicoletta Calzolari, Frédéric Béchet, Philippe Blache, Khalid Choukri, Christopher Cieri, Thierry Declerck, Sara Goggi, Hitoshi Isahara, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Héléń e Mazo, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk, and Stelios Piperidis (eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 34-43. European Language Resources Association. 미소장
13 Kim, Jong-Bok and Joanna Nykiel. 2020. The syntax and semantics of elliptical constructions: A direct interpretation perspective. Linguistic Research 37(2): 327-358. 미소장
14 Lobeck, Anne. 1993. Strong agreement and identification: Evidence from ellipsis in English. Linguistics 31(5): 777-811. 미소장
15 Lobeck, Anne and Petra Sleeman. 2017. Ellipsis in noun phrases. In Martin Everaert and Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to syntax (Second edition), 1-35. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 미소장
16 Lobeck, Anne C. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. New York: Oxford University Press. 미소장
17 López, Luis. 2000. Ellipsis and discourse-linking. Lingua 110(3): 183-213. 미소장
18 Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford:Oxford University Press. 미소장
19 Merchant, Jason. 2008. Variable island repair under ellipsis. In Kyle Johnson (ed.), Topics in ellipsis, 132-153. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
20 Merchant, Jason. 2014. Gender mismatches under nominal ellipsis. Lingua 151(Part A): 9-32. 미소장
21 Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2002. Pronominal nouns. In Heike Wiese and Horst J. Simon (eds.), Pronouns-grammar and representation, 183-203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. 미소장
22 Perlmutter, David M. 1970. On the article in English. In Manfred Bierwisch and Karl Erich Heidolph (eds.), Progress in linguistics, 233-248. The Hague: De Gruyter Mouton. 미소장
23 Pullum, Geoffrey K. 1975. (From: The principle of phonology-free syntax) people deletion in English. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 172-183. 미소장
24 Ross, John Robert. 1986. Infinite syntax! Norwood, NJ: Ablex. 미소장
25 Saab, Andrés. 2018. Nominal ellipsis. In Jeroen van Craenenbroeck and Tanja Temmerman (eds.), The Oxford handbook of ellipsis, 526-561. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 미소장
26 Sag, Ivan A and Jorge Hankamer. 1984. Toward a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3): 325-345. 미소장
27 Sag, Ivan A. 1976. Deletion and logical form. PhD Dissertation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17: 247-271. 미소장
28 Sleeman, Petra. 1996. Licensing empty nouns in French. PhD Dissertation. University of Amsterdam. 미소장
29 Stirling, Lesley and Rodney Huddleston. 2002. Deixis and anaphora. In Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), The Cambridge grammar of the English language, 1449-1566. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 미소장
30 Tanenhaus, Michael K. and Greg N. Carlson. 1990. Comprehension of deep and surface verb phrase anaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes 5(4): 257-280. 미소장
31 Thompson, Andrea. 2014. Beyond deep and surface: Explorations in the typology of anaphora. PhD Dissertation. University of California, Santa Cruz. 미소장
32 Wurmbrand, Susi. 2016. Agreement in nominal ellipsis: Consequences for the Agreement Hierarchy and the direction of Agree. An invited talk presented at Workshop on Agreement. Frankfurt, Germany. July 14. 미소장