본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

초록보기

The Korean Arbitration Act lacks the provision(s) for consumer protection, while Article 3 of the Addenda of the Japanese Arbitration Act prescribes the provision on exception relating to arbitration agreements concluded between a consumer and a business. In light of the discrepancy of bargaining power between a consumer and a business, the Japanese Arbitration Act states that a consumer may revoke a consumer arbitration agreement unless the consumer is a claimant in arbitral proceedings based on that agreement. Also, in the event that the party who is a consumer fails to appear on the date of the oral hearing, the said party shall be deemed to have cancelled the consumer arbitration.

In Korea, the Korea Consumer Agency plays a major role in engaging in consumer mediation. Some of them are concerned with undertaking contracts or construction contracts, even though there is some doubt as to whether contractors of those contracts can be classified as consumers.

At the outset, the Article explains the definition of a consumer in this regard. Afterwards, it deals with the current development in consumer arbitration before the Korean Commercial Arbitration Board (hereinafter referred to as "KCAB"), including arbitrations under undertaking contracts and construction contracts. In this context, it discusses the absence of arbitration before the Korea Consumer Agency. Based on the recent developments in consumer arbitration, it makes the following concluding remarks by proposing some reforms on consumer arbitration in Korea.

In this context, KCAB needs to allow mediation followed, in the absence of a settlement, by [expedited] arbitration under KCAB domestic and international arbitration rules. Also, KCAB needs to add a category entitled "consumer-related cases" as a specific field of arbitration cases.

권호기사

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 목차
Impacts of contractual rights' assignmenton arbitration agreements Ilyas Golcuklu p. 3-16

Gaps in the law and the defense of simultaneous performance in the CISG Sung Won Lee p. 17-40

Due process, confidentiality and impartiality : a study on arbitration principles in the post-pandemic digital environment Miriam Bartolozzi p. 41-68

Research on the expansion of the effect of arbitration agreements in China Li Naizhong p. 69-97

(The) significance of the language of arbitration agreements : focusing on the recent U.S. court's decision denying confirmation of arbitral award in Spineway SA v. Strategos Group LLC Jung Won Jun p. 99-126

Lawyer's incentive contract in arbitration : a signaling approach Joon Yeop Kwon, Sung Ryong Kim p. 127-142

In search of how to improve consumer arbitration in South Korea Gyooho Lee p. 143-163

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차