권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Background: Research investigating the relationship between latitude and network specialization plant-pollinator networks present conflicting results. While some studies indicate a positive link between latitude and network specialization, particularly in tropical regions, others suggest contradictory trends, with specialization declining towards lower latitudes. These studies underscore the intricate nature of ecological specialization in plant-pollinator networks and the need for further studies in this field to gain a more nuanced understanding of the underlying mechanisms driving these patterns. In this study, we explore the relationship between plant-pollinator network specialization and latitude using a global dataset comprising 93 plant-pollinator networks.
Results: Our analysis revealed a significant relationship with latitude mostly in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly concerning metrics such as connectance and nestedness. However, notably, we found no association with H2, a metric immune to the size, shape, or sampling effects of the network and considered highly suitable for measuring network specialization in both Hemispheres.
Conclusions: The absence of latitudinal trends in network specialization (H2) in both Hemispheres in this study imply that the mutual attraction between plants and pollinators remains relatively stable across various latitudes. Our comparison with prior research highlights the diversity of conclusions regarding how latitude influences plant-pollinator networks. While our results are consistent with certain studies, indicating no direct impact of latitude on network specialization, discrepancies persist.번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
---|---|---|
1 | Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. | 미소장 |
2 | Seeds: the ecology of regeneration in plant communities | 미소장 |
3 | How does climate warming affect plant‐pollinator interactions? | 미소장 |
4 | The architecture of mutualistic networks minimizes competition and increases biodiversity | 미소장 |
5 | Functional Diversity of Plant–Pollinator Interaction Webs Enhances the Persistence of Plant Communities | 미소장 |
6 | The niche, biogeography and species interactions | 미소장 |
7 | Why Are There So Many Species of Herbivorous Insects in Tropical Rainforests? | 미소장 |
8 | Functional complementarity and specialisation: The role of biodiversity in plant–pollinator interactions | 미소장 |
9 | Why are there so many species in the tropics? | 미소장 |
10 | Extinctions of aculeate pollinators in Britain and the role of large-scale agricultural changes | 미소장 |
11 | Do mutualisms matter? Assessing the impact of pollinator and disperser disruption on plant extinction | 미소장 |
12 | How many flowering plants are pollinated by animals? | 미소장 |
13 | Plant-Animal Mutualistic Networks: The Architecture of Biodiversity | 미소장 |
14 | Latitudinal trends in plant‐pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? | 미소장 |
15 | Is There a Latitudinal Gradient in the Importance of Biotic Interactions? | 미소장 |
16 | WHAT DO INTERACTION NETWORK METRICS TELL US ABOUT SPECIALIZATION AND BIOLOGICAL TRAITS | 미소장 |
17 | Global pollinator declines: trends, impacts and drivers | 미소장 |
18 | Specialization, Constraints, and Conflicting Interests in Mutualistic Networks | 미소장 |
19 | Bee declines driven by combined stress from parasites, pesticides, and lack of flowers | 미소장 |
20 | Unrivalled specialization in a pollination network from South Africa reveals that specialization increases with latitude only in the Southern Hemisphere | 미소장 |
21 | Rareness and specialization in plant–pollinator networks | 미소장 |
22 | The sudden collapse of pollinator communities | 미소장 |
23 | Why nestedness in mutualistic networks? | 미소장 |
24 | Land‐use impacts on plant–pollinator networks: interaction strength and specialization predict pollinator declines | 미소장 |
25 | Climatic control of dispersal–ecological specialization trade‐offs: a metacommunity process at the heart of the latitudinal diversity gradient? | 미소장 |
26 | Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes | 미소장 |
27 | Historical climate‐change influences modularity and nestedness of pollination networks | 미소장 |
28 | Safeguarding pollinators and their values to human well-being | 미소장 |
29 | Ecological networks are more sensitive to plant than to animal extinction under climate change | 미소장 |
30 | Network analysis of phenological units to detect important species in plant-pollinator assemblages: can it inform conservation strategies? | 미소장 |
31 | Local and regional specialization in plant–pollinator networks | 미소장 |
32 | Plant-Pollinator Networks in the Tropics: A Review | 미소장 |
33 | Geographic Patterns in Plant-Pollinator Mutualistic Networks | 미소장 |
34 | Geographic variation in the robustness of pollination networks is mediated by modularity | 미소장 |
35 | Widespread vulnerability of flowering plant seed production to pollinator declines | 미소장 |
36 | Plant–pollinator metanetworks in fragmented landscapes: a simulation study | 미소장 |
37 | Global Trends in Climate Suitability of Bees: Ups and Downs in a Warming World | 미소장 |
38 | The effect of elevation, latitude, and plant richness on robustness of pollination networks at a global scale | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.