권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
영문목차
Preface=xix
Acknowledgments=xxiii
The Constitution=xxvii
The Articles of Confederation=xlv
Chart of Supreme Court Justices=li
PART I. THE FOUNDATION OF MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
Chapter 1. The Origins of the Bill of Rights=3
A. The Natural Rights Background of the Constitution=3
1. The Declaration of Independence=4
a. Popular Sovereignty, the Social Compact, and the State of Nature=8
b. Natural Rights as a Constraint on Government=12
B. How the Bill of Rights Came to Be Added to the Constitution=15
1. Anti-Federalist Complaints About the Lack of a Bill of Rights=15
Centinel I, Independent Gazetteer=15
2. Federalist Objections to a Bill of Rights=16
James Wilson, Speech in the Statehouse Yard, Philadelphia=16
James Wilson, Speech to the Pennsylvania Ratification Convention=18
James Iredell, Speech to the North Carolina Ratification Convention=18
3. The Anti-Federalist Reply=19
Brutus II, The New York Journal=19
4. James Madison Delivers on the Promise of a Bill of Rights=20
Madison's Speech to the House Introducing Amendments=21
5. Roger Sherman's Draft Report of the Select Committee on a Bill of Rights=28
6. The Meaning of the Rights "Retained by the People"=30
C. Fundamental Principles vs. Expressed Constraints on Legislative Power=31
Calder v. Bull=32
Fletcher v. Peck=36
D. The Limited Original Scope of the Bill of Rights=39
Barron v. City of Baltimore=40
Chapter 2. Slavery and the Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment=45
A. The Rise of Abolitionist Constitutionalism=45
A Defence for Fugitive Slaves Against the Acts of Congress / Lysander Spooner=48
B. Slavery, Citizenship, and the Due Process of Law=50
Dred Scott v. Sandford=55
Frederick Douglass, Speech Delivered, in Part, at the Anniversary of the American Abolition Society, Held in New York=78
The Constitution of the United States : Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery? / Frederick Douglass=82
Chapter 3. Contracting the Scope of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments=85
A. The Adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments=87
B. Contracting the Privileges or Immunities Clause=92
1. Limiting the Privileges or Immunities Clause to Protecting National Rights=92
The Slaughter-House Cases=93
Bradwell v. State of Illinois=109
United States v. Cruikshank=112
2. Did the Original Meaning of "Privileges or Immunities of Citizens of the United States" Include the Bill of Rights?=115
McDonald v. City of Chicago=116
3. Did the Original Meaning of "Privileges or Immunities of the United States" Include Unenumerated Rights?=129
C. Limiting the Amendment to Protecting Against State Action=134
The Civil Rights Cases=136
D. Defining and Limiting the Scope of the Equal Protection Clause=151
1. Looking Behind Facially Neutral Laws=151
Yick Wo v. Hopkins=152
2. The "Separate but Equal" Doctrine=154
Plessy v. Ferguson=155
Chapter 4. Expanding the Scope of the Due Process Clause=167
A. The Due Process Clause Meets the Rise of the Regulatory State=168
1. Applying Fundamental Rights to the States via the Due Process Clause=170
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago=171
2. Using the Due Process Clause to Protect "Economic" Liberty=175
Lochner v. State of New York=177
Bailey v. State of Alabama=188
Buchanan v. Warley=193
Muller v. State of Oregon=197
Adkins v. Children's Hospital of District of Columbia=200
3. Using the Due Process Clause to Protect "Personal" Liberty=205
Meyer v. State of Nebraska=206
Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary=208
B. The Presumption of Constitutionality=210
1. Establishing the Presumption of Constitutionality=210
O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.=211
Nebbia v. People of State of New York=215
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish=220
2. Qualifying the Presumption of Constitutionality=223
United States v. Carolene Products Co.=224
Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial Review / John Hart Ely=228
3. What About the Ninth Amendment?=228
United Public Workers v. Mitchell=230
4. Making the Presumption of Constitutionality Irrebuttable=232
Lee Optical of Oklahoma v. Williamson=233
Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma=238
PART II. THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW
Chapter 5. Racial Discrimination=243
A. Rejecting "Separate but Equal"=244
1. Racial Discrimination by State Governments=244
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka=247
2. Racial Discrimination by the Federal Government=251
Bolling v. Sharpe=251
3. Is Brown Reconcilable with Original Meaning?=252
Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions / Michael W. McConnell=253
Brown, Originalism, and Constitutional Theory : A Response to Professor McConnell / Michael J. Klarman=261
The Originalist Justification for Brown : A Reply to Professor Klarman / Michael W. McConnell=263
4. Racial Classifications Applying Equally to Whites and Others=268
Loving v. Virginia=268
5. Discerning Discrimination Intent or Discriminatory Impact?=271
Washington v. Davis=272
B. "Reverse" Racial Discrimination=275
1. Admission to School=276
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke=277
Grutter v. Bollinger=286
Gratz v. Bollinger=297
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1=300
2. Employment=306
Adarand Constructors v. Pena=306
An Act to Establish a Bureau for the Relief of Freedmen and Refugees=317
Chapter 6. Sex Discrimination and Other Types=319
A. Sex Discrimination and Intermediate Scrutiny=319
Frontiero v. Richardson=321
Craig v. Boren=324
United States v. Virginia=328
B. Other Types of Discrimination and "Heightened" Rational Basis Scrutiny=338
Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.=339
Romer v. Evans=347
PART III. THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW
Chapter 7. Modern Substantive Due Process=359
A. Protecting the Unenumerated Right of Privacy=359
Griswold v. Connecticut=363
Loving v. Virginia=376
Roe v. Wade=377
B. Two Approaches to Protecting Liberty Under the Due Process Clauses=390
1. Protecting "Fundamental Rights"=390
Bowers v. Hardwick=391
Washington v. Glucksberg=399
Troxel v. Granville=413
2. Protecting "Liberty"=416
Planned Parenthood v. Casey=417
Washington v. Glucksberg=434
Gonzales v. Carhart=436
Lawrence v. Texas=443
Raich v. Gonzales=462
PART IV. THE FIRST AMENDMENT
Chapter 8. Freedoms of Speech and Press=471
A. Punishing Sedition=472
1. Sedition and Prior or Previous Restraint=472
The Virginia Resolution=474
The Kentucky Resolution=476
2. Sedition and "Clear and Present Danger"=481
Schenck v. United States=482
Debs v. United States=484
Abrams v. United States=487
Gitlow v. People of State of New York=490
Stromberg v. California=495
B. What Constitutes "Speech"?=496
1. When Is Conduct Speech?=497
United States v. O'Brien=497
Texas v. Johnson=501
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul=507
2. Does Money Equal Speech?=512
Buckley v. Valeo=513
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission=522
Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission=535
Davis v. Federal Election Commission=541
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission=548
Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett=577
C. What Constitutes "Abridging" the Freedom of Speech?=595
1. Does the First Amendment Ever Protect Speech That Is Tortious?=595
New York Times Co. v. Sullivan=597
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.=603
Snyder v. Phelps=608
United States v. Alvarez=617
2. Is the Press Exempt from General Laws?=628
Branzburg v. Hayes=629
Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.=633
3. May the Government Mandate Access to the Press?=636
Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission=637
Miami Herald v. Tornillo=641
D. Is Some Speech Less Worthy of Protection?=644
1. "Obscene" and Sexually Explicit Speech=644
Stanley v. Georgia=644
Miller v. California=647
Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition=652
United States v. Williams=658
2. Other Offensive Forms of Speech=663
United States v. Stevens=664
Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n=672
3. Commercial Speech=690
Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Consumer Council=691
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Serv. Commission=694
Lorillard Tobacco v. Reilly=697
Chapter 9. Freedom of Association=703
A. Compulsory Disclosure of Membership=704
NAACP v. Alabama=704
Buckley v. Valeo=706
McConnell v. Federal Election Commission=710
B. Compulsory Expression=711
Abood v. Detroit Board of Education=711
Board of Regents University of Wisconsin v. Southworth=713
Knox v. SEIU=718
C. Compulsory Association=725
Roberts v. United States Jaycees=726
Boy Scouts of America v. Dale=733
Chapter 10. The Free Exercise of Religion=745
A. Belief vs. Conduct=745
Reynolds v. United States=747
B. Generally Applicable Laws Impeding Free Exercise=751
Sherbert v. Verner=752
Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith=753
Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah=757
Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal=764
Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission=768
Chapter 11. No Establishment of Religion=779
A. Government "Entanglement" with Religion=781
Lemon v. Kurtzman=781
B. Government "Endorsement" of Religion=785
Marsh v. Chambers=786
The Detached Memorandum / James Madison=787
Lee v. Weisman=789
C. Governmental "Purpose" to Advance Religion=804
McCreary County, Kentucky v. ACLU of Kentucky=805
Van Orden v. Perry=820
PART V. THE SECOND AMENDMENT
Chapter 12. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms=829
A. Does the Second Amendment Protect an Individual Right?=830
District of Columbia v. Heller=832
B. Does the Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms Apply to States?=855
McDonald v. City of Chicago=857
C. How Should Regulations of Firearms Be Scrutinized?=881
The Reasonable Regulation of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms / Gary E. Barnett=881
Nordyke v. King=884
Ezell v. City of Chicago=889
PART VI. THE TAKINGS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT
Chapter 13. Taking Private Property for Public Use=899
A. What Is a "Taking"?=901
Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon=901
Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictis=904
Nollan v. California Coastal Commission=916
Dolan v. City of Tigard=921
B. What Is a "Public Use"?=926
Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff=927
Kelo v. City of New London=932
Table of Cases=949
Index=953
등록번호 | 청구기호 | 권별정보 | 자료실 | 이용여부 |
---|---|---|---|---|
0001866521 | LM 342.73 -A13-33 | 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) | 이용가능 |
Features:
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.