본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

영문목차

Preface=xix

Acknowledgments=xxiii

The Constitution=xxvii

The Articles of Confederation=xlv

Chart of Supreme Court Justices=li

PART I. THE FOUNDATION OF MODERN CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS

Chapter 1. The Origins of the Bill of Rights=3

A. The Natural Rights Background of the Constitution=3

1. The Declaration of Independence=4

a. Popular Sovereignty, the Social Compact, and the State of Nature=8

b. Natural Rights as a Constraint on Government=12

B. How the Bill of Rights Came to Be Added to the Constitution=15

1. Anti-Federalist Complaints About the Lack of a Bill of Rights=15

Centinel I, Independent Gazetteer=15

2. Federalist Objections to a Bill of Rights=16

James Wilson, Speech in the Statehouse Yard, Philadelphia=16

James Wilson, Speech to the Pennsylvania Ratification Convention=18

James Iredell, Speech to the North Carolina Ratification Convention=18

3. The Anti-Federalist Reply=19

Brutus II, The New York Journal=19

4. James Madison Delivers on the Promise of a Bill of Rights=20

Madison's Speech to the House Introducing Amendments=21

5. Roger Sherman's Draft Report of the Select Committee on a Bill of Rights=28

6. The Meaning of the Rights "Retained by the People"=30

C. Fundamental Principles vs. Expressed Constraints on Legislative Power=31

Calder v. Bull=32

Fletcher v. Peck=36

D. The Limited Original Scope of the Bill of Rights=39

Barron v. City of Baltimore=40

Chapter 2. Slavery and the Origins of the Fourteenth Amendment=45

A. The Rise of Abolitionist Constitutionalism=45

A Defence for Fugitive Slaves Against the Acts of Congress / Lysander Spooner=48

B. Slavery, Citizenship, and the Due Process of Law=50

Dred Scott v. Sandford=55

Frederick Douglass, Speech Delivered, in Part, at the Anniversary of the American Abolition Society, Held in New York=78

The Constitution of the United States : Is It Pro-Slavery or Anti-Slavery? / Frederick Douglass=82

Chapter 3. Contracting the Scope of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments=85

A. The Adoption of the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Amendments=87

B. Contracting the Privileges or Immunities Clause=92

1. Limiting the Privileges or Immunities Clause to Protecting National Rights=92

The Slaughter-House Cases=93

Bradwell v. State of Illinois=109

United States v. Cruikshank=112

2. Did the Original Meaning of "Privileges or Immunities of Citizens of the United States" Include the Bill of Rights?=115

McDonald v. City of Chicago=116

3. Did the Original Meaning of "Privileges or Immunities of the United States" Include Unenumerated Rights?=129

C. Limiting the Amendment to Protecting Against State Action=134

The Civil Rights Cases=136

D. Defining and Limiting the Scope of the Equal Protection Clause=151

1. Looking Behind Facially Neutral Laws=151

Yick Wo v. Hopkins=152

2. The "Separate but Equal" Doctrine=154

Plessy v. Ferguson=155

Chapter 4. Expanding the Scope of the Due Process Clause=167

A. The Due Process Clause Meets the Rise of the Regulatory State=168

1. Applying Fundamental Rights to the States via the Due Process Clause=170

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co. v. City of Chicago=171

2. Using the Due Process Clause to Protect "Economic" Liberty=175

Lochner v. State of New York=177

Bailey v. State of Alabama=188

Buchanan v. Warley=193

Muller v. State of Oregon=197

Adkins v. Children's Hospital of District of Columbia=200

3. Using the Due Process Clause to Protect "Personal" Liberty=205

Meyer v. State of Nebraska=206

Pierce v. Society of the Sisters of the Holy Names of Jesus and Mary=208

B. The Presumption of Constitutionality=210

1. Establishing the Presumption of Constitutionality=210

O'Gorman & Young, Inc. v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co.=211

Nebbia v. People of State of New York=215

West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish=220

2. Qualifying the Presumption of Constitutionality=223

United States v. Carolene Products Co.=224

Democracy and Distrust : A Theory of Judicial Review / John Hart Ely=228

3. What About the Ninth Amendment?=228

United Public Workers v. Mitchell=230

4. Making the Presumption of Constitutionality Irrebuttable=232

Lee Optical of Oklahoma v. Williamson=233

Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma=238

PART II. THE EQUAL PROTECTION OF THE LAW

Chapter 5. Racial Discrimination=243

A. Rejecting "Separate but Equal"=244

1. Racial Discrimination by State Governments=244

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka=247

2. Racial Discrimination by the Federal Government=251

Bolling v. Sharpe=251

3. Is Brown Reconcilable with Original Meaning?=252

Originalism and the Desegregation Decisions / Michael W. McConnell=253

Brown, Originalism, and Constitutional Theory : A Response to Professor McConnell / Michael J. Klarman=261

The Originalist Justification for Brown : A Reply to Professor Klarman / Michael W. McConnell=263

4. Racial Classifications Applying Equally to Whites and Others=268

Loving v. Virginia=268

5. Discerning Discrimination Intent or Discriminatory Impact?=271

Washington v. Davis=272

B. "Reverse" Racial Discrimination=275

1. Admission to School=276

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke=277

Grutter v. Bollinger=286

Gratz v. Bollinger=297

Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1=300

2. Employment=306

Adarand Constructors v. Pena=306

An Act to Establish a Bureau for the Relief of Freedmen and Refugees=317

Chapter 6. Sex Discrimination and Other Types=319

A. Sex Discrimination and Intermediate Scrutiny=319

Frontiero v. Richardson=321

Craig v. Boren=324

United States v. Virginia=328

B. Other Types of Discrimination and "Heightened" Rational Basis Scrutiny=338

Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.=339

Romer v. Evans=347

PART III. THE DUE PROCESS OF LAW

Chapter 7. Modern Substantive Due Process=359

A. Protecting the Unenumerated Right of Privacy=359

Griswold v. Connecticut=363

Loving v. Virginia=376

Roe v. Wade=377

B. Two Approaches to Protecting Liberty Under the Due Process Clauses=390

1. Protecting "Fundamental Rights"=390

Bowers v. Hardwick=391

Washington v. Glucksberg=399

Troxel v. Granville=413

2. Protecting "Liberty"=416

Planned Parenthood v. Casey=417

Washington v. Glucksberg=434

Gonzales v. Carhart=436

Lawrence v. Texas=443

Raich v. Gonzales=462

PART IV. THE FIRST AMENDMENT

Chapter 8. Freedoms of Speech and Press=471

A. Punishing Sedition=472

1. Sedition and Prior or Previous Restraint=472

The Virginia Resolution=474

The Kentucky Resolution=476

2. Sedition and "Clear and Present Danger"=481

Schenck v. United States=482

Debs v. United States=484

Abrams v. United States=487

Gitlow v. People of State of New York=490

Stromberg v. California=495

B. What Constitutes "Speech"?=496

1. When Is Conduct Speech?=497

United States v. O'Brien=497

Texas v. Johnson=501

R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul=507

2. Does Money Equal Speech?=512

Buckley v. Valeo=513

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission=522

Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. v. Federal Election Commission=535

Davis v. Federal Election Commission=541

Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission=548

Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett=577

C. What Constitutes "Abridging" the Freedom of Speech?=595

1. Does the First Amendment Ever Protect Speech That Is Tortious?=595

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan=597

Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.=603

Snyder v. Phelps=608

United States v. Alvarez=617

2. Is the Press Exempt from General Laws?=628

Branzburg v. Hayes=629

Cohen v. Cowles Media Co.=633

3. May the Government Mandate Access to the Press?=636

Red Lion Broadcasting Co. v. Federal Communications Commission=637

Miami Herald v. Tornillo=641

D. Is Some Speech Less Worthy of Protection?=644

1. "Obscene" and Sexually Explicit Speech=644

Stanley v. Georgia=644

Miller v. California=647

Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition=652

United States v. Williams=658

2. Other Offensive Forms of Speech=663

United States v. Stevens=664

Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass'n=672

3. Commercial Speech=690

Virginia Pharmacy Bd. v. Virginia Consumer Council=691

Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Serv. Commission=694

Lorillard Tobacco v. Reilly=697

Chapter 9. Freedom of Association=703

A. Compulsory Disclosure of Membership=704

NAACP v. Alabama=704

Buckley v. Valeo=706

McConnell v. Federal Election Commission=710

B. Compulsory Expression=711

Abood v. Detroit Board of Education=711

Board of Regents University of Wisconsin v. Southworth=713

Knox v. SEIU=718

C. Compulsory Association=725

Roberts v. United States Jaycees=726

Boy Scouts of America v. Dale=733

Chapter 10. The Free Exercise of Religion=745

A. Belief vs. Conduct=745

Reynolds v. United States=747

B. Generally Applicable Laws Impeding Free Exercise=751

Sherbert v. Verner=752

Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith=753

Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah=757

Gonzales v. O Centro Espirita Beneficente União do Vegetal=764

Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission=768

Chapter 11. No Establishment of Religion=779

A. Government "Entanglement" with Religion=781

Lemon v. Kurtzman=781

B. Government "Endorsement" of Religion=785

Marsh v. Chambers=786

The Detached Memorandum / James Madison=787

Lee v. Weisman=789

C. Governmental "Purpose" to Advance Religion=804

McCreary County, Kentucky v. ACLU of Kentucky=805

Van Orden v. Perry=820

PART V. THE SECOND AMENDMENT

Chapter 12. The Right to Keep and Bear Arms=829

A. Does the Second Amendment Protect an Individual Right?=830

District of Columbia v. Heller=832

B. Does the Individual Right to Keep and Bear Arms Apply to States?=855

McDonald v. City of Chicago=857

C. How Should Regulations of Firearms Be Scrutinized?=881

The Reasonable Regulation of the Right to Keep and Bear Arms / Gary E. Barnett=881

Nordyke v. King=884

Ezell v. City of Chicago=889

PART VI. THE TAKINGS CLAUSE OF THE FIFTH AMENDMENT

Chapter 13. Taking Private Property for Public Use=899

A. What Is a "Taking"?=901

Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon=901

Keystone Bituminous Coal Ass'n v. Debenedictis=904

Nollan v. California Coastal Commission=916

Dolan v. City of Tigard=921

B. What Is a "Public Use"?=926

Hawaii Housing Authority v. Midkiff=927

Kelo v. City of New London=932

Table of Cases=949

Index=953

이용현황보기

Constitutional rights : cases in context 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0001866521 LM 342.73 -A13-33 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
Constitutional Rights: Cases in Context places primary emphasis on how constitutional law has developed, its foundational principles, and recurring debates, rather than focusing simply on doctrinal details. Teachable, manageable, class-sized chunks of material are suited to one-semester courses or reduced credit configurations. Generous case excerpts make the text flexible for most courses, no matter the ideology or interpretative method. Cases are judiciously supplemented with background readings from various sources. Providing additional context, the readings are long enough to help students understand the arguments, and edited where necessary to prevent overwhelming them. Constitutional Rights: Cases in Context represents rival interpretations of the Constitution by founders, presidents, and other critics of the Courtand#8217;s decisions better than do many other casebooks. Boxed study guide questions before each case help students focus on the salient issues, challenge them to consider the courtand#8217;s opinions from various perspectives, suggest comparisons or connections with other cases, and invite the student to think about recurring foundational principles and debates. The two-color design also features an art program. Constitutional Rights: Cases in Context covers Parts I and III of the parent book, Constitutional Law: Cases in Context, and can be taught in its entirety in one-semester courses. The text, available in e-formats as well as print, is accompanied by an in-depth Teacherand#8217;s Manual and an annual case supplement.

Features:

  • emphasis on how constitutional law has developed, its foundational principles, and recurring debates, rather than on just doctrinal details
  • teachable, class-sized chunks
    • manageable for professors and students
    • better suited to one-semester courses or reduced credit configurations
  • generous case excerpts for flexibility in teaching, no matter the approach
  • cases supplemented with judicious background readings
    • various sources provide context
    • readings are long enough to help students to understand arguments
    • edited where necessary to prevent overwhelming the reader
  • represents rival interpretations of the Constitution by founders, presidents, and critics of the Court's decisions
  • includes boxed study guide questions before each case
    • challenge students to consider the court's opinions from various perspectives
    • direct the student to key aspects of the case
    • encourage student to see points of disagreement among opinions
    • suggest comparisons or connections with other cases
    • explore recurring foundational principles and debates
  • two-color design with an art program
  • covers parts I and III of the parent book, Constitutional Law: Cases in Context
  • can be taught in its entirety in one-semester Con Law courses
  • supplemented by an annual case supplement
  • available in e-format as well as print