본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
22대 대한민국 국회 국회정보길라잡이 국회의원검색
회원가입 로그인
HOME

정보검색

소장정보 검색

국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함
결과 내 검색 동의어 포함

-

목차보기


Preface
Acknowledgments
Introduction
1 The Rise and Fall of Moral Science
1. Philosophy Lost
2. The Is-Ought Problem
3. Justice as Traffic Management
4. What Is a Theory?
2 After Solipsism
5. Strategic Consequentialism
6. After Shallow Pond
7. What Works
8. Strategic Deontology
3 Toward a Realistic Idealism
9. Ideal Theory: What It Was
10. Justice Is Not a Peak
11. Compliance Is Not a Detail
12. High Standards
4 Political Economy and Moral Science I
13. The Moral Science of Adam Smith
14. The Political Economy of Corruption
5 Political Economy and Moral Science II
15. Political Economy and the Rule of Law
16. Cost-Benefit Analysis as Moral Science
6 Inventing the Self
17. The Reconciliation Project
18. Rational Choice Theory’s Silence About Ends
19. Reasons for Reasons
20. Navigating the Terrain of Reasons
7 The Possibility of Civilization
21. Ecological Justice
22. A Brief History of the Human Condition
23. Toward a Realist Morality
Epilogue
References
Index

이용현황보기

Living together : inventing moral science 이용현황 표 - 등록번호, 청구기호, 권별정보, 자료실, 이용여부로 구성 되어있습니다.
등록번호 청구기호 권별정보 자료실 이용여부
0003030294 170 -A23-8 서울관 서고(열람신청 후 1층 대출대) 이용가능

출판사 책소개

알라딘제공
David Schmidtz disputes the idea that rigorous reflection on how to live needs to begin with timeless axioms, rather than with more ephemeral circumstances of time and place. Rather, he argues that theorizing about how to live together should take its cue from contemporary moral philosophy's attempts to go beyond formal theory, and should ask which principles have a history of demonstrably being organizing principles of actual thriving communities at theirbest.

Is moral philosophy more foundational than political theory? It is often assumed to be. David Schmidtz argues that the reverse is true: the question of how to live in a community is more fundamental than questions about how to live. This book questions whether we are getting to the foundations of human morality when we ignore contingent features of communities in which political animals live.Schmidtz disputes the idea that reflection on how to live needs to begin with timeless axioms. Rather, theorizing about how to live together should take its cue from contemporary moral philosophy's attempts to go beyond formal theory, and ask which principles have a history of demonstrably being organizing principles of actual thriving communities at their best. Ideals emerging from such research should be a distillation of social scientific insight from observable histories of successfulcommunity building. What emerges from ongoing testing in the crucible of life experience will be path-dependent in detail even if not in general outline, partly because any way of life is a response to challenges that are themselves contingent, path dependent, and in flux.Building on this view, Schmidtz argues that justice evolved as a device for grounding peace in the mutual recognition that everyone has their own life to live, and everyone has the right and the responsibility to decide for themselves what to want. Justice, he says, evolved as a device for conveying our mutual intention not to be in each other's way, and beyond that, our mutual intention to build places for ourselves as contributors to a community. Any understanding of justice should thus relynot on untestable intuitions but should instead be grounded in observable fact.

추천서가 (다양한 추천 자료를 만나보세요)

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차