권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Contents
1. Foreword by Secretary of State for Education, Rt Hon Michael Gove MP 6
2. Purpose of this report 8
3. Background to the academies programme 9
4. Data relating to the number, type and location of academies 11
Case study: Darlington local authority 12
5. Giving schools the freedom to innovate 16
Freedom from local authority (LA) control and greater control of budgets 16
Case study: Dulwich Hamlet Junior School 16
Freedoms around the delivery of the curriculum 16
Case study: Haywood Academy 16
The ability to set school term dates 17
Case study: David Young Community Academy 17
The freedom to set teacher pay and conditions 17
Case study: Parbold Douglas Church of England Academy 17
6. Performance of converter academies 18
Converter performance continues to outstrip that of local authority (LA) maintained schools 18
Converter academies also perform well in Ofsted inspections. Data from Ofsted shows that converter academies are more likely to retain or improve their Ofsted ratings than local authority run schools 18
Case study: St Thomas More Catholic School 19
Primary schools are converting in increasing numbers 19
Case study: Bolton Brow Primary Academy 20
Case study: Southwark Primary School 20
The first alternative provision academies are now open and the number of special academies continues to grow 20
Case study: The Bridge Alternative Provision Academy 21
Case study: Fosse Way School 21
7. Performance of sponsored academies 22
Increased focus on transforming underperforming primary schools into sponsored academies 22
Case study: Harris Primary Academy Philip Lane 22
Case study: Ryecroft Primary Academy 22
Sponsored academy performance improves the longer they are open 23
Case study: Nene Park Academy 23
Case study: Wilmington Academy 23
Case study: King Solomon Academy 24
The number of high quality academy sponsors continues to grow 24
Case study: Outwood Grange Academies Trust 26
Case study: George Spencer Academy 26
8. School-to-school support: Academies working together 27
Benefits of being part of a chain of schools 27
Case study: The Harris Federation 27
Converting in partnership - strong schools 28
Case study: The Primary Academies Trust 28
Converting in partnership - weaker schools 28
Case study: The Williamson Trust 28
Multi-academy trusts 28
Funding for primary schools joining a chain 29
Case study: Northampton Primary Academy Trust 29
Mixed multi-academy trusts 29
Case study: Parish Church of England Primary School 30
Teaching school alliances 30
Case study: Tudor Grange Academy 30
9. How academies cater for vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils 31
Pupils eligible for free school meals 31
Special educational needs 32
Outcomes for vulnerable and disadvantaged pupils 33
Case study: Harris Academy Greenwich 34
Case study: Westminster Academy 35
Case study: Archbishop Sentamu Academy 35
10. Robust intervention on underperformance and safe management of the system 36
Acting quickly to tackle underperformance 36
Case study: Etone College 37
Underperforming sponsors 37
Case study: North Shore Academy 37
Financial Accountability 38
11. Finance and value for money 39
12. Free schools 40
Performance and attainment 41
Costs 41
Case study: Canary Wharf College 41
Case study: Perry Beeches lll The Free School 41
13. University technical colleges and studio schools 43
University technical colleges (UTCs) 43
Case study: Liverpool Life Sciences UTC 43
Studio schools 44
Case study: Devon Studio School 45
14. Further analysis for academies sector and equalities analysis 46
Ethnic group 46
Gender 46
Special educational needs 47
15. Secretary of State as Principal Regulator 49
16. Conclusion 51
Annex A. proportion of pupils that achieved level 4 or above in reading, writing and mathematics, by pupil characteristics 52
Annex B. proportion of pupils that achieved 5+ A-C including English and mathematics GCSEs (including equivalents), by pupil characteristics 53
Figure 1. The number of academies opened by year, up to and including the 2012/13 reporting year 11
Figure 2. The number of academies by type and age range during, and by the end of, the 2012/13 reporting year 12
Figure 3. The percentage of state-funded mainstream secondary schools that were open as academies as at 31 July by local authority. 14
Figure 4. The percentage of state-funded mainstream primary schools that were open as academies as at 31 July 2013 by local authority. 15
Figure 5. Total number of academy sponsors July 2013 24
Figure 6. Proportion of pupils known to be eligible for free school meals by academy status, January 2013 31
Figure 7. Proportion of pupils with special educational needs by academy status, January 2013 33
Figure 8. Breakdown by gender, ethnicity and special educational needs of pupils in academies and all state funded schools (as proportion of all pupils), January 2013 48
Figure 9. The proportion of pupils that achieved level 4 or above in reading, writing and mathematics at key stage 2 in 2012 and 2013 in sponsored academies, converter academies, local authority maintained mainstream schools and all state-funded schools by pupil characteristics 52
Figure 10. The proportion of pupils that achieved 5+ A-C at GCSE (including equivalents) including English and mathematics GCSE in 2012 and 2013 in sponsored academies, converter academies, local authority maintained mainstream schools and all state-funded schools by pupil characteristics 53
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.