본문바로가기

자료 카테고리

전체 1
도서자료 1
학위논문 0
연속간행물·학술기사 0
멀티미디어 0
동영상 0
국회자료 0
특화자료 0

도서 앰블럼

전체 (1)
일반도서 (0)
E-BOOK (0)
고서 (0)
세미나자료 (0)
웹자료 (1)
전체 (0)
학위논문 (0)
전체 (0)
국내기사 (0)
국외기사 (0)
학술지·잡지 (0)
신문 (0)
전자저널 (0)
전체 (0)
오디오자료 (0)
전자매체 (0)
마이크로폼자료 (0)
지도/기타자료 (0)
전체 (0)
동영상자료 (0)
전체 (0)
외국법률번역DB (0)
국회회의록 (0)
국회의안정보 (0)
전체 (0)
표·그림DB (0)
지식공유 (0)

도서 앰블럼

전체 1
국내공공정책정보
국외공공정책정보
국회자료
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
지방자치단체 ()
공공기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
정부기관 ()
의회기관 ()
싱크탱크 ()
국제기구 ()
전체 ()
국회의원정책자료 ()
입법기관자료 ()

검색결과

검색결과 (전체 1건)

검색결과제한

열기
자료명/저자사항
Understanding teachers' pedagogical knowledge : report on an international pilot study / by Kristina Sonmark [and four others]. 인기도
발행사항
Paris : OECD, 2017.
청구기호
Only available full-text DB
자료실
전자자료
내용구분
research papers : statistics
형태사항
1 online resource : PDF
출처
외부기관 원문
총서사항
OECD Education working papers ; no. 159
면수
151
제어번호
NONB2201719611
주기사항
EDU/WKP(2017)8.
JT03420399.
원문

목차보기더보기

Title page

Contents

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 4

ABSTRACT 5

RESUME 5

CHAPTER 1: THE INNOVATIVE TEACHING FOR EFFECTIVE LEARNING (ITEL) TEACHER KNOWLEDGE SURVEY 12

Introduction 12

The teacher knowledge survey instrument 14

Conceptual framework of professional competence 14

Teacher Knowledge Survey instrument 17

Conclusions and reflections 22

CHAPTER 2: DATA COLLECTION AND VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENTS 24

Introduction 24

Sampling and data collection 24

Assessment data 25

Institutional and system level data 26

Validation of the assessment framework 27

Summary of methodological considerations and recommendations 33

CHAPTER 3: THE CONTEXT OF TEACHER EDUCATION IN THE PARTICIPATING COUNTRIES AND INSTITUTIONS 36

The wider context: The teaching profession in participating countries 36

Teacher education at the country and institutional levels 41

The bottom line 52

CHAPTER 4: TEACHERS' PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 53

Introduction 53

The ITEL TKS assessment results 56

Thematic analysis of sub-dimensions 64

Conclusions and recommendations for a large-scale study 68

CHAPTER 5: TEACHERS' OPPORTUNITIES TO LEARN 69

Introduction 69

Opportunities to learn: The content and quality of teacher learning in initial teacher education and professional development 69

Relationship between pedagogical knowledge and opportunities to learn 82

Conclusions and recommendations for the further development of the instrument 84

CHAPTER 6: DRIVERS OF TEACHERS' PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE 86

Introduction 86

Teacher self-efficacy 87

Teacher self-responsibility 91

Motivations for teaching 94

Goal orientations 97

Enthusiasm 98

Commitment to teaching 99

Conclusions and recommendations 103

CHAPTER 7: THE PENDING AGENDA 105

Introduction 105

Knowledge as a complex system 106

Conclusions and recommendations for next steps 108

ANNEX I. ITEL TEACHER KNOWLEDGE SURVEY 2016 DATA 114

ANNEX II. DESCRIPTION OF CONSTRUCTS AND SCALES 127

ANNEX III. ITEL TEACHER KNOWLEDGE SURVEY INSTRUMENT 136

ANNEX IV. VALIDATION OF THE PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE INSTRUMENT 136

REFERENCES 137

Table 1.1. Description of the ITEL TKS assessment framework and selected topics 18

Table 1.2. Supplementary measures of pedagogical knowledge 19

Table 1.3. Dimensions of opportunities to learn in the ITEL TKS 21

Table 1.4. Teacher motivation dimensions with constructs and scales 22

Table 2.1. Sampling framework - Individual level criteria 25

Table 2.2. Courses taught by teacher educators 25

Table 2.3. Final sample sizes 26

Table 2.4. Example of Group 3 items in the teacher sample 30

Table 2.5. Validation - Teacher and teacher candidate samples 32

Table 2.6. Summary of items in groups 2 and 3, by thematic orientation and type of knowledge 32

Table 4.1. Items characterised by ease/difficulty along the proficiency scale, by dimension 57

Table 4.2. Pedagogical knowledge profiles by country and sample 60

Table 5.1. Stage of study of teacher candidates 71

Table 6.1. Scales in the self-efficacy construct 87

Table 6.2. Quality of teaching practice: constructs and scales in the ITEL TKS 88

Table 6.3. Scales in the self-responsibility construct 91

Table 6.4. Scales in the motivations for teaching construct 94

Table 6.5. Commitment to teaching scales 100

Figure 1.1. Conceptual framework of teachers' professional competence 16

Figure 1.2. Item illustrating the learning process dimension 20

Figure 2.1. Completion of the assessment by sample and by country 27

Figure 2.2. Item characteristic curve example of Group 1: Satisfactory differentiation in teacher candidate sample 29

Figure 2.3. Item characteristic curve example of Group 2: Poor differentiation in teacher sample 29

Figure 2.4. Item as part of core knowledge on teacher sample (left) and teacher candidate sample (right) 31

Figure 2.5. Item as part of 21st century key demands in teacher sample (left) and teacher candidate sample (right) 31

Figure 3.1. Age distribution of teachers in lower secondary education (2015); Distribution of teachers in educational institutions, by age group 36

Figure 3.2. Age distribution of teachers in the ITEL TKS 37

Figure 3.3. Age distribution of teacher candidates in the ITEL TKS 37

Figure 3.4. Gender distribution of teachers in the ITEL TKS 38

Figure 3.5. Gender distribution of teacher candidates in the ITEL TKS 38

Figure 3.6. Lower secondary teachers' salaries at different points in their careers 39

Figure 3.7. Teacher professionalism in Estonia, the Slovak Republic and Israel as measured by TALIS 40

Figure 3.8. Participation in professional development activities 41

Figure 3.9. Initial teacher education for subject teachers in general education in Estonia 43

Figure 3.10. Initial teacher education in Greece 45

Figure 3.11. Initial teacher education in Hungary 47

Figure 3.12. Initial teacher education in Israel 49

Figure 3.13. Initial teacher education in the Slovak Republic 51

Figure 4.1. Profile 1.1. High assessment, modest instruction, low learning 58

Figure 4.2. Profile 1.2. High assessment, modest learning, low instruction 58

Figure 4.3. Profile 1.3. High assessment, balanced learning and instruction 59

Figure 4.4. Profile 2. High Instruction 59

Figure 4.5. Profile 3. Balanced 60

Figure 4.6. Profile of Teachers, Teacher candidates and Teacher Educators in Estonia 61

Figure 4.7. Teachers, Teacher candidates and Teacher Educators in Greece 62

Figure 4.8. Profile of Teachers, Teacher candidates and Teacher Educators in Hungary 62

Figure 4.9. Profile of Teachers, Teacher candidates and Teacher Educators in Israel 63

Figure 4.10. Profile of Teachers, Teacher candidates and Teacher Educators in the Slovak Republic 64

Figure 4.11. Profile of teacher candidates, teachers and teacher educators per sub-dimension 66

Figure 4.12. Knowledge profiles based on type of knowledge, thematic orientation and cognitive demand 67

Figure 5.1. Opportunities to learn pedagogical content in the three main dimensions 70

Figure 5.2. Percentage of respondents reporting having learnt about various aspects of teaching diverse classrooms (international pooled data) 73

Figure 5.3. Percentage of respondents reporting having learnt about three selected aspects of teaching diverse classrooms 74

Figure 5.4. Percentage of respondents reporting having learnt about 21st century pedagogies versus educational and learning theories 76

Figure 5.5. Percentage of respondents reporting having learnt about certain 21st century pedagogies 78

Figure 5.6. Quality of opportunities to learn in initial teacher education and professional development 79

Figure 5.7. Opportunities to learn: Methods used by teacher educators at lectures and seminars 80

Figure 5.8. Engagement with and in research 81

Figure 5.9. Percentage of pedagogical knowledge items that show a relationship with corresponding opportunities to learn 82

Figure 6.1. Percentage of respondents who feel high self-efficacy in instructional strategies and classroom management 88

Figure 6.2. Frequency of various assessment practices 89

Figure 6.3. Percentage of respondents who feel very efficacious in engaging students in school 90

Figure 6.4. Self-responsibility in quality of teaching and relationships with students 92

Figure 6.5. Teacher responses to 'I would feel personally responsible if a student of mine had very low achievement' 93

Figure 6.6. Percentage of teachers who report intrinsic/extrinsic factors as very important in the decision to enter teaching 95

Figure 6.7. Percentage of teachers who report their abilities as very important in the decision to enter teaching 96

Figure 6.8. Percent of teachers agreeing with the statement 97

Figure 6.9. Enthusiasm in teachers and teacher candidates 99

Figure 6.10. Planned persistence in teachers versus teacher candidates: pooled data 100

Figure 6.11. Willingness to invest personal time across the pooled sample 102

Figure 6.12. Interest in professional development in teachers and teacher candidates 103

Boxes

Box 1.1. Conceptualising knowledge and learning 15

Box 1.2. Testing methods 20

Box 4.1. What do we mean by a score? 56

Box 4.2. Is teacher knowledge relevant to 21st century teaching? 67

Box 5.1. Opportunities to learn about teaching diverse classrooms in the ITEL TKS instrument 72

Box 5.2. Opportunities to learn 21st century teaching in the ITEL TKS instrument 75

Box 5.3. Gamification as an innovative pedagogy 77

Box 5.4. Knowledge dynamics in the teaching profession 81

Box 6.1. Teachers' self-reported practices: an example in use of assessment 88

Box 6.2. Self-Responsibility for student learning: Examining the distribution 93

Box 6.3. Social career value in ITEL and TALIS 97

Annex Tables

Table I.3.1/Table I.3.2. Age distribution of teachers in the ITEL TKS 114

Table I.3.2/Table I.3.3. Age distribution of teacher candidates in the ITEL TKS 114

Table I.3.3/Table I.3.4. Gender distribution of teachers in the ITEL TKS 114

Table I.3.4/Table I.3.5. Gender distribution of teacher candidates in the ITEL TKS 114

Table I.4.5 to I.4.9/Table I.4.6 to I.4.10. Pedagogical knowledge of teachers, teacher candidates and teacher educators in the ITEL TKS 115

Table I.4.10/Table I.4.11. Profile of teacher candidates, teachers and teacher educators per sub-dimension 115

Table I.4.11/Table I.4.12. Knowledge profiles based on type of knowledge, thematic orientation and cognitive demand 115

Table I.5.1. Opportunities to learn pedagogical content in the three main dimensions 116

Table I.5.2. Opportunities to learn about teaching diverse classrooms (pooled data) 116

Table I.5.3. Opportunities to learn about teaching diverse classrooms (by country) 116

Table I.5.4. Opportunities to learn 21st century pedagogies versus educational and learning theories (pooled data) 117

Table I.5.5. Opportunities to learn 21st century pedagogies versus educational and learning theories (by country) 117

Table I.5.6. Quality of opportunities to learn in initial teacher education and professional development 118

Table I.5.7. Opportunities to learn: Methods used by teacher educators at lectures and seminars 118

Table I.5.8. Engagement with and in research 119

Table I.5.9. Pedagogical knowledge items that show a relationship with corresponding opportunities to learn 119

Table I.5.10. Relationship between professional collaboration and engagement in and with research 120

Table I.5.11. Relationship between professional collaboration and engagement in and with research 120

Table I.6.1. Self-efficacy in instructional strategies and classroom management 120

Table I.6.2. Instructional quality: Frequency of various assessment practices 121

Table I.6.3. Self-efficacy in student engagement 121

Table I.6.4. Self-responsibility in quality of teaching and relationships with students 121

Table I.6.5. Teacher responses to ''I would feel personally responsible if a student of mine had very low achievement'' 122

Table I.6.6. Intrinsic and Extrinsic motivations for teaching 122

Table I.6.7. Ability as a motivation for teaching 122

Table I.6.8. Social career value as a motivation for teaching 123

Table I.6.9. Enthusiasm 123

Table I.6.10. Planned persistence in teachers versus teacher candidates 123

Table I.6.11. Willingness to invest personal time across the pooled sample 124

Table I.6.12. Interest in professional development in teachers and teacher candidates 124

Table I.6.13. Relationships between self-efficacy in instructional strategies and use of assessment 124

Table I.6.14. Relationships between self-efficacy subscales and scope of field experience, teacher candidates 125

Table I.6.15. Relationship between self-efficacy and professional collaboration 125

Table I.6.16. Relationship between self-responsibility and self-efficacy 125

Table I.6.17. Relationship between social goals of teachers and social support for students 125

Table I.6.18. Relationship between enthusiasm and self-efficacy in student engagement 126

Table I.6.19. Relationships between planned persistence and intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy 126

Table I.6.20. Relationship between self-efficacy in student engagement and willingness to invest personal time 126

Table II.5.1. Opportunities to learn the main knowledge dimensions: Instructional process; Learning process; Assessment 127

Table II.5.2. Quality of opportunities to learn: Quality of Instruction; Demands; Student Agency 129

Table II.5.3. Research activities: Engagement in research, and with research 129

Table II.5.4. Professional collaboration 130

Table II.5.5. Field experience: Quantity of Experiences; Scope of Experiences; Professional Support 130

Table II.5.6. Performance Evaluation of teacher educators 131

Table II.5.7. Teaching Practices of teacher educators 131

Table II.6.1. Quality of teaching practice 132

Table II.6.2. Teacher Self-efficacy scale 133

Table II.6.3. Motivations for teaching scale 134

Table II.6.4. Goal orientations 134

Table II.6.5. Teacher self-responsibility 134

Table II.6.6. Intrinsic orientations 135

Table II.6.7. Commitment to teaching 135

권호기사보기

권호기사 목록 테이블로 기사명, 저자명, 페이지, 원문, 기사목차 순으로 되어있습니다.
기사명 저자명 페이지 원문 기사목차
연속간행물 팝업 열기 연속간행물 팝업 열기