본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

Title page

Contents

SUMMARY 2

1. INTRODUCTION 4

2. MARGINALISATION: WHY IT MATTERS FOR DEMOCRACY 6

2.1. DEFINITION OF MARGINALISATION 7

2.2. WHY IS MARGINALISATION AN IMPORTANT ISSUE FOR OUR DEMOCRACY AND WHAT ARE THE CONSEQUENCES? 8

2.3. HOW COULD DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY RESPOND TO MARGINALISATION? 10

2.4. HOW WOULD DELIBERATIVE DEMOCRACY ITSELF WORSEN MARGINALISATION IN A SOCIETY? 10

3. UNDERSTANDING OF MARGINALISED POPULATIONS 12

3.1. GENERAL DISCUSSION ON (LACK OF) MOTIVATIONS BEHIND POLITICAL PARTICIPATION 12

3.2. SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS 13

3.3. EDUCATION LEVEL 14

3.4. GENDER 15

3.5. IMMIGRATION STATUS 17

3.6. DISABILITY 18

3.7. AGE 18

4. PRACTICES FOR ENGAGING MARGINALISED POPULATIONS 21

4.1. INCLUSIVE RECRUITMENT AND ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY 22

4.2. INTERACTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY 26

4.3. FOLLOW-UP STRATEGY 34

5. CONCLUSION 36

REFERENCES 38

ANNEX I 45

Figures

Figure 1. Potential benefits of deliberative democracy 10

Figure 2. Factors contributing to marginalisation 12

Figure 3. Recruitment options into deliberative activities 23

Figure 4. Ensuring unbiased moderation 27

Figure 5/Figure 4. Discussion formats 30

Figure 6/Figure 5. Use of digital tools in deliberation 33

Boxes

Box 1. Deliberative democracy 9

Box 2. Key takeaways of inclusive recruitment and engagement strategy 22

Box 3. Key takeaways of interaction management strategy 26

Box 4. Key takeaways of follow-up strategy 34

초록보기

This CEPS In-depth Analysis aims to engage two primary audiences. First, it offers academics and policymakers a comprehensive overview of the literature on involving marginalised populations in deliberative democracy. This overview not only examines the theoretical foundation of how marginalisation undermines the prospects of deliberative democracy but also explores the factors contributing to such exclusion. Second, the Analysis provides practical guidance for practitioners in deliberative democracy and event organisers who incorporate elements of democratic dialogue. After all, this In-depth Analysis bridges the gap between theory and practice, contributing to the continued progress of deliberative democracy.