영문목차
표제지 = 0,1,2
ABSTRACT = ⅰ,3,2
TABLE OF CONTENTS = ⅲ,5,3
LIST OF TABLES = ⅵ,8,1
LIST OF FIGURE = ⅶ,9,1
OVERALL INTRODUDTION = 1,10,2
Volume Ⅰ. APPLYING MULTI-ATTRIBUTE UTILITY THEORY TO DECISION-MAKING IN ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING : = 3,12,1
A CASE STUDY OF ELECTRIC UTILITY OF KOREA = 3,12,1
1. Introduction = 3,12,3
2. Methodology : MAUT = 5,14,2
3. Application to KEPCO = 6,15,2
3.1 Step 1 : Identifying Objectives and Attributes = 7,16,4
3.2 Step 2 : Quantifying Attributes = 10,19,3
3.3 Step 3 : Verifying the Relevance of Assumptions = 12,21,2
3.4 Step 4 : Examining the Single Attribute Utility Function = 13,22,2
3.5 Step 5 : Determining the Importance of Attributes = 14,23,2
3.6 Step 6 : Constructing the MUF = 15,24,2
3.7 Step 7 : Assessing the Economic Value Trade-offs = 17,26,1
4. Implications of the Results for KEPCO = 18,27,1
4.1 Insights from the Objectives and Attributes = 18,27,2
4.2 Potential Decision Opportunities = 19,28,2
4.3 Current Uses in KEPCO = 20,29,1
4.4 Potential Uses of the Utility Function = 20,29,2
4.5 Further Decision Opportunities in Application = 21,30,2
4.6 Advantages of MAUT Techique = 22,31,2
5. Concluding remarks = 23,32,2
Volume Ⅱ. A CONSTRUCTIVE APPROACH TO AIR QUALITY VALUATION IN SEOUL = 25,34,1
1. Introduction = 25,34,3
2. Methodology : MAUT/CV = 27,36,3
3. Attributes and Utility Functions = 29,38,1
3.1 Identifying Attributes of Air Quality = 29,38,4
3.2 Defining Attributes = 32,41,5
3.3 Single Attribute Utility Function = 36,45,1
3.4 Multi-Attribute Utility Function = 36,45,3
4. Methods = 38,47,1
4.1 Survey = 38,47,2
4.2 Steps in Applying MAUT/CV = 39,48,4
5. Results = 43,52,1
5.1 Elicitation Results = 43,52,8
5.2 Estimation of WTP Equation = 50,59,5
5.3 Economic Valuation of Air Emissions = 54,63,3
6. Discussion and Conclusion = 56,65,4
Volume Ⅲ. DEALING WITH ZERO RESPONSE DATA FROM CONTINGENT VALUATION SURVEYS : APPLICATION OF LEAST ABSOLUTE DEVIATIONS ESTIMATOR = 60,69,1
1. Introduction = 60,69,2
2. WTP Model and Censoring Problem =61,70,4
3. Pretests and Estimation = 65,74,2
4. Results = 66,75,4
5. Concluding remarks = 70,79,1
OVERALL CONCLUSION = 71,80,2
BIBLIOGRAPHY = 73,82,10
APPENDIX = A-1, 92,1
Appendix A. Survey Questionnaire = A-2,93,33
Appendix B. Background Information = A-35,126,47
Appendix C. Survey Questionnaire = A-82,173,14
Appendix D. Procedures of Extracting WTP for Each Attribute = A-96,187,3
Appendix E. Bootstrap Method = A-99,190,1
국문초록 = 0,191,2
감사의 글 = 0,193,1