「Historic city Preservative law」 was enacted for the purpose of not only to preserve environment of historical culture of historic cities but also to protect the right of their properties who live there. This law was applied since 2005, however, there are no case that have been applied but a plan. This is the reason why the law does not fully reflect the goals of the legislation.
For this reason, the Cultural Heritage Administration and the Law Research Institute of Seoul National University in Korea tried to make up the draw backs on the ‘Research of the way of the reform of 「 Historic city Preservative law」’ in Dec. 2005. However, this research focused on the legislative point, so additional research is needed in the “viewpoint of scenic preservation and maintenance”
The importance of value of historic culture is growing now, and this is one of the important part of national and urban competition power. In this research tried to find other options that can be adopted to Korea in the preceding researches and foreign related laws. And then, analyzing the structure and content of related Korean laws and find some omitted contents.
Analyzing tool with three aspects; system, plan, maintenance; is arranged with these researches and professional question is performed. Target of survey is composed of related field professionals and officials. Content of survey is composed of ‘relationship among related legislations’, ‘historic city district’, ‘relationship between central and regional governments’, ‘act restrictions in the historic city’ and ‘residents participation’.
Independent T-test and One-Way ANOVA test wereperformed to analyze that there are significant different preference between groups and among alternatives.