Title Page
Contents
Abstract 11
Chapter 1. Introduction 13
1.1. Background of research 13
1.2. The purpose of research 13
1.3. Thesis organization 14
Chapter 2. The Introduction of the ICDs 16
2.1. Literature review 16
2.2. Study on the ICDs in the world. 19
2.3. The situation of the ICDs in Vietnam 23
2.4. Major ICDs in the South of Vietnam 26
2.4.1. Tan Cang - Long Binh ICD 26
2.4.2. Tay Nam ICD 29
2.4.3. Song Than ICD 30
2.4.4. Sotrans ICD 32
2.4.5. Nhon Trach ICD 34
2.4.6. Information of ICD in the south of Vietnam. 36
Chapter 3. Methodology 39
3.1. AHP methodology 39
3.2. Fuzzy AHP 43
Chapter 4. Factors in the evaluation the potential of ICD 49
4.1. Ability of multimodal transportation 49
4.2. Potential of area 53
4.3. Investment and operation cost 55
4.4. Potential of performance 57
Chapter 5. Application of Methodology 58
5.1. Case study 58
5.2. Evaluation of the sub - attributes of each criteria 66
5.3. Pair wise comparison of alternative 74
Chapter 6. Conclusion 85
Reference 86
SURVEY FORM 90
Table 1. Information of ICD in the south of Vietnam 37
Table 2. Number of comparison depend on number of things 41
Table 3. The relative importance between two criteria 42
Table 4. Random Consistency Index 43
Table 5. Triangular fuzzy number 44
Table 6. Using AHP method to set up matrix 60
Table 7. Priority vector and weight 60
Table 8. Transformation between linguistic responses and fuzzy... 63
Table 9. Pair- wise comparison matrixes of Main criteria 64
Table 10. Total value based on row and column 64
Table 11. Fuzzy value of 4 main criteria are compared 65
Table 12. Pair- wise comparison matrixes of the sub- criteria in the first... 67
Table 13. Fuzzy value of 3 sub criteria of the first main criteria are... 67
Table 14. Priority weight of criteria in first main attribute "Investment... 68
Table 15. Pair- wise comparison matrixes of the sub- criteria in the... 69
Table 16. Fuzzy value of 3 sub criteria of the Second main criteria are... 69
Table 17. Priority weight of criteria in second main attribute Ability of... 70
Table 18. Pair- wise comparison matrixes of the sub- criteria in the third... 70
Table 19. Fuzzy value of 3 sub criteria of the third main criteria are... 71
Table 20. Priority weight of criteria in second main attribute Potential of... 72
Table 21. Pair- wise comparison matrixes of the sub- criteria in the last... 72
Table 22. Fuzzy value of 3 sub criteria of the third main criteria are... 73
Table 23. Priority weight of criteria in second main attribute Potential of... 74
Table 24. The pair-wise comparison for the alternatives regarding to sub... 74
Table 25. Summary of priority weights for alternatives "Investment and... 76
Table 26. The pair-wise comparison for the alternatives regarding to sub... 77
Table 27. Summary of priority weights for alternatives "Ability of... 78
Table 28. The pair-wise comparison for the alternatives regarding to sub... 79
Table 29. Summary of priority weights for alternatives "Potential of... 80
Table 30. The pair-wise comparison for the alternatives regarding to sub... 81
Table 31. Summary of priority weights for alternatives "Potential of... 82
Table 32. Priority weights of criteria and alternative 83
Table 33. The ranking of 5 Major ICDs in the evaluation of potential 85
Figure 1. City in the South Vietnam 26
Figure 2. Location of Tan Cang - Long Binh ICD 29
Figure 3. Location of Tay Nam ICD 30
Figure 4. Location of Song than ICD 32
Figure 5. Location of Sotrans ICD 34
Figure 6. Location of Tan Cang - Nhon Trach ICD 36
Figure 7. The intersection between m₁ and m₂ 47
Figure 8. Decision Hierarchical structure 59
Figure 9. Using system to calculate Ci and CR 61
Figure 10. Calculate ξ and λ 62
Figure 11. Calculate ξ and λ 63