The Resident Participation Budget System, first launched in Porto Allegre, Brazil more than 30 years ago, was the starting point for the "failure of representation" of distortion of the people's will and corruption of the city government and local assembly, which were formed in a democratic way, which the problems of the world were experiencing at that time. Neighborhood civic groups in Porto-Alegre City protested the distorted decision on the resources or financial allocation of the municipal government, and the participation movement, which started from the financial monitoring campaign, demanded more participation in the budget compilation and developed into a resident participation system in which residents share the mayor's right to compile the budget. Porto-Alegrecy carefully designed the process of residents' participation, dialogue, and discussion based on direct democracy. Now, many cities and local governments around the world implement fiscal democracy, participatory democracy, and deliberative democracy.
In Korea, the participatory budget system is in operation nationwide, mixed with the system of leading local governments in 2004 and the normative institutionalization under the Local Finance Act in 2011. The change and spread by the leading group are proceeding quietly. However, if you look at the data and statistics studied, the participation of most local governments and the formal operation of the system are pointed out as literary points.
Therefore, direct democratic participation and deliberative participation, which are the institutional core of Porto-Allegre and others, were proposed as improvement measures. First, it is the confirmation of direct democratic participation involving all residents. It is to use the general meeting of village , which is open to all residents, as a basic participation mechanism for the residents' participation budget system. The members of the village share a sense of belonging, identity, and common interests. They are prepared to devote a little bit the community. Instead of artificially (administrative) making the residents' participation budget system for the residents' participation budget system, the residents' participation budget system can participate in small community living in the region. The government should move away from the practice of inviting residents to the audience under the name of participation and change it to a way in which administrative agencies are willing to participate in the invitation of residents.
Another is the "deliberative participation." The open subcommittees of eup, myeon, and dong and the forums for each field at the local level were presented as complementary participation mechanisms. Through dialogue and discussion, residents will go through a public debate process, find sympathetic public virtues, reflect them in their policies (budget), and share their experiences and achievements to ensure the sustainability of their participation.