표제지
목차
Abstract 5
제1장 서론 13
1.1. 연구의 배경 13
1.2. 연구의 필요성 14
1.3. 연구의 목적 및 내용 16
1.4. 연구의 구성 17
제2장 선행연구 분석 19
2.1. 국내외 지능형 시스템의 연구 19
2.2. SMART Navigation 전자해도 활용 분석 21
2.2.1. 최적 안전항로 서비스에서 전자해도 활용 22
2.2.2. 최적 안전항로 서비스의 전자해도 활용에 대한 한계점 23
2.2.3. 최적 안전항로 서비스의 한계에 대한 해결방안 26
2.3. 지능형 시스템을 위한 수로정보 모델의 필요성 27
제3장 URHII 모델링 30
3.1. 모델링 방법 및 절차 31
3.2. URHII 모델의 객체 정의 33
3.2.1. S-101 전자해도의 객체 정의 분석 33
3.2.2. URHII 모델에서의 객체 분류 36
3.2.3. URHII 모델의 요구사항 분석 43
3.2.4. URHII 모델 논리 데이터 모델링 59
3.3. URHII 모델의 물리 데이터 모델링 68
제4장 모델 검증을 위한 시뮬레이션 75
4.1. 실험환경 75
4.1.1. 실험 데이터 생성 75
4.1.2. 실험 데이터의 활용 90
4.2. 최적 안전항로 서비스 적용 결과 92
제5장 결론 102
참고문헌 104
Table 2.1. Levels of autonomy 19
Table 3.1. Feature List of S-101 ENC on S-101 DCEG 34
Table 3.2. Alert and indication features on S-164 TDS 38
Table 3.3. Alert and indication features on S-101 Portrayal Catalogue 39
Table 3.4. Features related with Navigational Direction 41
Table 3.5. Features of Skin of Earth on S-101 ENC PS 43
Table 3.6. Standard of Depth Compilation Distance on ENC 44
Table 3.7. Category of Zone of Confidence 54
Table 3.8. Analysis of Feature Attributes Related with Navigational Safety 56
Table 3.9. Common Attributes 60
Table 3.10. Features Related with Sounding Depth 60
Table 3.11. Feature Information of Sounding Depth 61
Table 3.12. Features Related with Structure of Height 62
Table 3.13. Feature Information of Structure has Height 62
Table 3.14. Features Related with Caution Area 63
Table 3.15. Feature Information of Caution Area 63
Table 3.16. Features Related with Fixed Structure 64
Table 3.17. Feature Information of Fixed Structure 65
Table 3.18. Features Related with Floating Structure 65
Table 3.19. Feature Information of Floating Structure 66
Table 3.20. Features Related with Floating Structure 67
Table 3.21. Feature Information of Underwater Obstruction 67
Table 3.22. Feature Information of Voyage Direction 68
Fig. 1.1. Difference between URHII Model and ENC Model 17
Fig. 2.1. Heights and Elevations 22
Fig. 2.2. Desirable Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service Request Result 24
Fig. 2.3. Undesirable Result of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service 1 24
Fig. 2.4. Undesirable Result of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service 2 25
Fig. 2.5. Undesirable Result of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service 3 26
Fig. 2.6. Results of the survey on the use of waterways information by researchers and navigators 28
Fig. 3.1. Modelling Development Procedure 30
Fig. 3.2. URHII Modelling Procedure 32
Fig. 3.3. URHII Modelling Procedure 32
Fig. 3.3. Example of indication highlighting on ECDIS 36
Fig. 3.4. Example Danger Highlight on ECDIS 37
Fig. 3.5. Reference of Sounding Compilation Spacing 45
Fig. 3.6. Change of Requirements for Sounding 46
Fig. 3.7. Example of Chart of Firing and Bombing Exercise Areas in the Coasts of Korea 48
Fig. 3.8. The Mooring Form of Buoys 50
Fig. 3.9. Buoyage Regions A and B 52
Fig. 3.10. Marking of fixed bridges over navigable waters(Buoyage Region A) 52
Fig. 3.11. Marking of fixed bridges over navigable waters(Buoyage Region B) 53
Fig. 3.12. Change of Requirements for Lateral Bouy/Beacon 54
Fig. 3.13. Charted feature depth and position accuracies accounting for Zone of Confidence 55
Fig. 3.14. Change of Requirements for Floating Structures 56
Fig. 3.15. Logical Object Generation according to Requirements 59
Fig. 3.16. Relationship between model and implementation 71
Fig. 3.17. Overview Structure of Dataset 72
Fig. 3.18. Full Application Schema of URHII 73
Fig. 3.19. Dataset Metadata Part of Application Schema 73
Fig. 3.20. Dataset Part of Application Schema 74
Fig. 3.21. Geo Feature Part of Application Schema 74
Fig. 4.1. ENC of Test Area (Mokpo)[원문불량;p.64] 76
Fig. 4.2. Test Data Display of Sounding Depth 77
Fig. 4.3. Test Data Display of Structure has Height 79
Fig. 4.4. Test Data Display of Caution Area 80
Fig. 4.5. Test Data Display of Fixed Structure 81
Fig. 4.6. Test Data Display of Floating Structure 82
Fig. 4.7. Test Data Display of Underwater Obstruction 83
Fig. 4.8. Example of a Route Display on ENC 1 84
Fig. 4.9. Example of a Route Display on ENC 2 85
Fig. 4.10. Example of a Route Display on ENC 3 86
Fig. 4.11. Example of a Route Display on ENC 4 87
Fig. 4.12. Test Voyage Direction Region on ENC 88
Fig. 4.13. Original Voyage Direction on ENC 88
Fig. 4.14. One-Way Voyage Direction on ENC 89
Fig. 4.15. Rasterized Voyage Direction 89
Fig. 4.16. Display of Test Data to Route Planning 92
Fig. 4.17. Algorithm of Result of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service 93
Fig. 4.18. Procedure of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service Results Using Electronic Chart Model 94
Fig. 4.19. Procedure of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service Results Using URHII Model 94
Fig. 4.20. Location of Starting Point and End Point 95
Fig. 4.21. Result of Safe & Optimal Route Planning Service 96
Fig. 4.22. The Pilotage Passage Plan[원문불량;p.85] 97
Fig. 4.23. Picture of Calculated Route and Verified Route in the Passageway 98
Fig. 4.24. Spatial Gap Comparison 1 99
Fig. 4.25. Spatial Gap Comparison 2 100
Fig. 4.26. Graph of Spatial Gap Comparison Result 101