표제지
목차
Abstract 7
제1장 서론 34
1.1. 연구의 배경 34
1.2. 연구의 목적 40
1.3. 연구의 방법 및 구성 43
제2장 해양구조물에 대한 통항선박 안전 규정 및 지침 46
2.1. 국내 안전 규정 및 지침 46
2.1.1. 해사안전법 46
2.2. 국외 안전 규정 및 지침 47
2.2.1. 해양법에 관한 국제연합 협약 47
2.2.2. PIANC Guideline 48
2.2.3. Marine Guidance Note 54
2.2.4. Japan Recommendations 58
2.3. 국내외 안전 규정 및 지침 비교·분석 59
제3장 해상풍력단지 국외 사례 분석 62
3.1. 항로 형태별 해상풍력단지 현황 62
3.1.1. 지정항로 인근에 개발된 해상풍력단지 62
3.1.2. 일반수역 및 배타적 경제수역(EEZ)에 개발된 해상풍력단지 68
3.2. 해상풍력단지와 항로 또는 풍력단지 간 이격거리 현황 73
3.2.1. 지정항로 인근에 개발된 해상풍력단지 74
3.2.2. 일반 수역 및 배타적 경제수역(EEZ)에 개발된 해상풍력단지 80
3.3. 해상풍력단지와 항만 간 항행거리 현황 85
3.3.1. 지정항로 인근에 개발된 해상풍력단지 85
3.3.2. 일반수역 및 배타적 경제수역(EEZ)에 개발된 해상풍력단지 93
3.4. 해상풍력단지 국외 사례 분석 결과 98
제4장 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 모델 제시 100
4.1. 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 모델 제시를 위한 개발 방법 및 평가요소 100
4.2. 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 평가 요소 102
4.2.1. 운항 준비상태에 기반을 둔 선박 선회성능 102
4.2.2. 선박 조우상태에 따른 크기의 변화 112
4.2.3. 환경 외력의 영향 114
4.2.4. 해상교통밀집도 영향 117
4.2.5. 해상풍력발전기 기능과 형상에 따른 크기 119
4.3. 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전을 위한 항로 형태별 기준점 설정 121
4.3.1. 지정항로 121
4.3.2. 일반수역 및 배타적 경제수역(EEZ) 134
4.4. 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 모델 제시 136
제5장 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 모델의 검증 141
5.1. 국외 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 사례 검증 143
5.1.1. 항로 형태에 따른 풍력단지 개발위치 및 풍력발전기 제원 143
5.1.2. 항로 형태에 따른 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항거리 분석 결과 147
5.2. 선박조종시뮬레이션을 통한 통항안전 모델의 검증 296
5.2.1. 선박조종시뮬레이션 개요 296
5.2.2. 시뮬레이터에 사용되는 수학 모델 299
5.2.3. 시뮬레이션 수행을 위한 조건 설정 303
5.2.4. 선박조종시뮬레이션 수행 시나리오 309
5.2.5. 선박조종시뮬레이션을 통한 모델의 평가 결과 313
5.3. 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 모델의 검증 결과 328
5.3.1. 국외 해상풍력단지와 선박의 통항안전 사례 검증 결과 328
5.3.2. 선박조종시뮬레이션을 통한 통항안전 모델의 검증 결과 332
제6장 결론 335
참고 문헌 339
부록 342
Table 2.1. Requirements for minimum safety distance between maritime navigation and offshore wind farms 53
Table 3.1. Navigation distance between port and Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 85
Table 3.2. Navigation distance between port and Humber gateway offshore wind farm 86
Table 3.3. Navigation distance between port and Greater gabbard offshore wind farm 88
Table 3.4. Navigation distance between port and Borssele offshore wind farm 89
Table 3.5. Navigation distance between port and OWFs at north water of Germany 90
Table 3.6. Navigation distance between port and Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 91
Table 3.7. Navigation distance between port and Borssele offshore wind farm 92
Table 3.8. Navigation distance from OWF to port located in west water of UK 93
Table 3.9. Navigation distance from Westermost rough OWF to port 95
Table 3.10. Navigation distance from OWF to port located in east water of UK 96
Table 3.11. Navigation distance from Horns rev 1&3 OWF to port 97
Table 4.1. Application for safety passage distance according to external forces 115
Table 4.2. Application for safety passage distance according to external forces 116
Table 4.3. Model for navigation safety of offshore wind farm and ship(TSS) 137
Table 4.4. Model for navigation safety of offshore wind farm and ship(Channel) 138
Table 4.5. Model for navigation safety of offshore wind farm and ship(General water) 139
Table 5.1. Distance between offshore wind farm and harbor, rotor diameter of wind turbine developed at Traffic separation schemes 144
Table 5.2. Distance between offshore wind farm and harbor, rotor diameter of wind turbine developed at channel 145
Table 5.3. Distance between offshore wind farm and harbor, rotor diameter of wind turbine developed at general waters 146
Table 5.4. Specifications for Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 147
Table 5.5. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 151
Table 5.6. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at Gwynt mor offshore wind farms 152
Table 5.7. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at Gwynt mor offshore wind farms by suggested model 153
Table 5.8. Result of suitability for suggested model at Gwynt mor offshore wind farms 154
Table 5.9. Specifications for Humber gateway offshore wind farm 155
Table 5.10. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 159
Table 5.11. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at Humber gateway offshore wind farms 159
Table 5.12. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at Humber gateway offshore wind farms by suggested model 160
Table 5.13. Result of suitability for suggested model at Humber gateway offshore wind farms 161
Table 5.14. Specifications for Greater gabbard offshore wind farm 162
Table 5.15. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 168
Table 5.16. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 169
Table 5.17. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms by suggested model 170
Table 5.18. Result of suitability for suggested model at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 171
Table 5.19. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at west side water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 172
Table 5.20. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at west side water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms by suggested model 174
Table 5.21. Result of suitability for suggested model at west side water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 175
Table 5.22. Specifications for Borssele offshore wind farm 176
Table 5.23. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 180
Table 5.24. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at north water of Borssele offshore wind farms 180
Table 5.25. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at north water of Borssele offshore wind farms by suggested model 181
Table 5.26. Result of suitability for suggested model at north water of Borssele offshore wind farms 182
Table 5.27. Specifications for offshore wind farm for north/south water of Germany 183
Table 5.28. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 189
Table 5.29. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at north/south water of German offshore wind farms 190
Table 5.30. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at north/south water of German offshore wind farms by suggested model 191
Table 5.31. Result of suitability for suggested model at north/south water of German offshore wind farms 192
Table 5.32. Specifications for Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 193
Table 5.33. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 197
Table 5.34. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farms 198
Table 5.35. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farms by... 199
Table 5.36. Result of suitability for suggested model at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farms 200
Table 5.37. Specifications for Borssele offshore wind farm 201
Table 5.38. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 205
Table 5.39. Status of distance for Sailing ship of Max. size at south-east water of Borssele offshore wind farms 205
Table 5.40. Result of the review Min. distance for Max. size ship at south-east water of Borssele offshore wind farms by suggested model 206
Table 5.41. Result of suitability for suggested model at south-east water of Borssele offshore wind farms 207
Table 5.42. Specifications for Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm 208
Table 5.43. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 213
Table 5.44. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south-east water of Inner dowsing, Lynn and... 213
Table 5.45. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south-east water of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farms... 214
Table 5.46. Result of suitability for suggested model(South-east water at Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farms) 215
Table 5.47. Specifications for west of duddon sands offshore wind farm 216
Table 5.48. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 220
Table 5.49. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south water of West of duddon sands... 221
Table 5.50. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of West of duddon sands offshore wind farms by... 222
Table 5.51. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at West of duddon sands offshore wind farms) 223
Table 5.52. Specifications for Walney 1&2 phase, North of West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow offshore wind farm 224
Table 5.53. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 228
Table 5.54. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at Walney 1&2 phase, West of duddon sands,... 229
Table 5.55. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at Walney 1&2 phase, West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow... 230
Table 5.56. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at Walney 1 phase offshore wind farms) 231
Table 5.57. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at Walney 2 phase offshore wind farms) 231
Table 5.58. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at West of duddon sands offshore wind farms) 231
Table 5.59. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Barrow offshore wind farms) 232
Table 5.60. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Ormonde offshore wind farms) 232
Table 5.61. Specifications for Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm 233
Table 5.62. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 237
Table 5.63. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south water of Horn rev 1 offshore wind farms 238
Table 5.64. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of Horns rev 1 offshore wind farms by suggested model 239
Table 5.65. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Horn rev 1 offshore wind farms) 240
Table 5.66. Specifications for Westermost rough offshore wind farm 241
Table 5.67. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 245
Table 5.68. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at east water of Westermost rough offshore wind farms 246
Table 5.69. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of Westermost rough offshore wind farms by suggested model 247
Table 5.70. Result of suitability for suggested model(East water at Westermost rough offshore wind farms) 248
Table 5.71. Specifications for Walney extension offshore wind farm 249
Table 5.72. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 253
Table 5.73. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south-west water of Walney extension... 254
Table 5.74. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south-west water of Walney extension offshore wind farms by suggested model 255
Table 5.75. Result of suitability for suggested model(South-west water at Walney extension offshore wind farms) 256
Table 5.76. Specifications for Race bank offshore wind farm 257
Table 5.77. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 262
Table 5.78. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at north water of Race bank offshore wind farms 263
Table 5.79. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at north water of Race bank offshore wind farms by suggested model 264
Table 5.80. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at Race bank offshore wind farms) 265
Table 5.81. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south water of Race bank offshore wind farms 265
Table 5.82. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of Race bank offshore wind farms by suggested model 266
Table 5.83. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Race bank offshore wind farms) 267
Table 5.84. Specifications for Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 268
Table 5.85. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 272
Table 5.86. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at north water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms 273
Table 5.87. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at north water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms by suggested model 274
Table 5.88. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms) 275
Table 5.89. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms 275
Table 5.90. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms by suggested model 276
Table 5.91. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Sheringham shoal offshore wind farms) 277
Table 5.92. Specifications for Dudgeon offshore wind farm 278
Table 5.93. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 282
Table 5.94. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at north water of Dudgeon offshore wind farms 283
Table 5.95. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at north water of Dudgeon offshore wind farms by suggested model 284
Table 5.96. Result of suitability for suggested model(North water at Dudgeon offshore wind farms) 285
Table 5.97. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farms 285
Table 5.98. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farms by suggested model 286
Table 5.99. Result of suitability for suggested model(South water at Dudgeon offshore wind farms) 287
Table 5.100. Specifications for Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm 288
Table 5.101. The result of Marine traffic survey for Gate line 292
Table 5.102. Status of distance for Sailing ships of Max. size and largest value within 90% range at west water of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farms 293
Table 5.103. Result of the review Min. distance for ship of Max. size at west water of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farms by suggested model 294
Table 5.104. Result of suitability for suggested model(West water at Horn rev 3 offshore wind farms) 295
Table 5.105. External forces condition 306
Table 5.106. The boarding experience of participants for ship handling simulation 307
Table 5.107. Status of target ships operated for ship handling simulation 308
Table 5.108. The Summary for qualitative opinion of participants for crossing condition and congestion of marine traffic(1) 322
Table 5.109. The Summary for qualitative opinion of participants for crossing condition and congestion of marine traffic(2) 323
Table 5.110. The Summary for qualitative opinion of participants for crossing condition and congestion of marine traffic(3) 324
Table 5.111. The Summary for qualitative opinion of participants for crossing condition and congestion of marine traffic(4) 325
Table 5.112. The Summary for qualitative opinion of participants for crossing condition and congestion of marine traffic(5) 326
Table 5.113. Result of verification for navigation case of OWF and ship(1) 330
Table 5.114. Result of verification for navigation case of OWF and ship(2) 331
Fig. 1.1. Flowchart of the study process 45
Fig. 2.1. Required safety distance with OWF in TSS 50
Fig. 2.2. Required safety distance with OWF in japan recommendations 58
Fig. 3.1. Status of offshore wind farm developed in vicinity of TSS 62
Fig. 3.2. Location of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm, UK 63
Fig. 3.3. Location of Humber gateway offshore wind farm, UK 64
Fig. 3.4. Location of Greater gabbard offshore wind farm, UK 64
Fig. 3.5. Location of Borssele offshore wind farm, Netherlands 65
Fig. 3.6. Location of Offshore wind farms at north water of Germany 65
Fig. 3.7. Status of offshore wind farm developed in vicinity of Channel 66
Fig. 3.8. Location of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm, UK 67
Fig. 3.9. Location of Borssele offshore wind farm, Netherlands 67
Fig. 3.10. Status of offshore wind farm developed at no waters designated channel 68
Fig. 3.11. Location of Offshore wind farms at north-west water of UK 69
Fig. 3.12. Location of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm, UK 70
Fig. 3.13. Location of Westermost rough offshore wind farm, UK 70
Fig. 3.14. Location of Race bank offshore wind farm, UK 71
Fig. 3.15. Location of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm, UK 71
Fig. 3.16. Location of Dudgeon offshore wind farm, UK 72
Fig. 3.17. Location of Horns rev 1,3 offshore wind farm, UK 72
Fig. 3.18. Status of offshore wind farm developed in vicinity of TSS or Channel 74
Fig. 3.19. Distance to OWFs and TSS adjacent with Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 75
Fig. 3.20. Distance between TSS Humber gateway offshore wind farm 76
Fig. 3.21. Distance between TSS and Greater gabbard offshore wind farm 76
Fig. 3.22. Distance to TSS adjacent with Borssele offshore wind farm 77
Fig. 3.23. Distance to OWFs and TSS adjacent with offshore wind farm at north water of Germany 77
Fig. 3.24. Status of offshore wind farm developed in vicinity of Channel 78
Fig. 3.25. Distance to OWFs and Channel adjacent with Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 79
Fig. 3.26. Distance to channel adjacent with Borssele offshore wind farm 79
Fig. 3.27. Status of offshore wind farm developed at no waters designated channel 80
Fig. 3.28. Distance among the offshore wind farms(Inner dowsing, Lynn, Lincs) 81
Fig. 3.29. Distance among the offshore wind farms(North-west water of UK) 81
Fig. 3.30. Distance between Westermost rough and Humber gateway offshore wind farm 82
Fig. 3.31. Distance among the offshore wind farms(Race bank and Inner dowsing, Lynn, Lincs and Sheringham shoal) 82
Fig. 3.32. Distance among the offshore wind farms(Race bank and Sheringham shoal and Dudgeon) 83
Fig. 3.33. Distance between Dudgeon offshore wind farm and Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 83
Fig. 3.34. Distance among the offshore wind farms(Horns rev 1, 2 & 3) 84
Fig. 3.35. The navigation distance between port and Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 86
Fig. 3.36. The navigation distance between port and Humber gateway offshore wind farm 87
Fig. 3.37. The navigation distance between port and Greater gabbard offshore wind farm 88
Fig. 3.38. The navigation distance between port and Borssele offshore wind farm 89
Fig. 3.39. The navigation distance between port and OWFs at north water of Germany 90
Fig. 3.40. The navigation distance between port and Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 91
Fig. 3.41. The navigation distance between port and Borssele offshore wind farm 92
Fig. 3.42. The navigation distance between port and OWFs at west water of UK 94
Fig. 3.43. The navigation distance between port and Westermost rough offshore wind farm 95
Fig. 3.44. The navigation distance between port and OWFs at east water of UK 96
Fig. 3.45. The navigation distance between port and OWFs at west water of Denmark 97
Fig. 4.1. The development method for navigation safety model of offshore wind farm and vessel 101
Fig. 4.2. Size(L) of tactical diameter for general(Bulk, Ore) ships 107
Fig. 4.3. Size(L) of tactical diameter for dangerous goods(Tanker) ships 107
Fig. 4.4. Size(L) of tactical diameter for Container ships 108
Fig. 4.5. Size(L) of tactical diameter for passenger ships 108
Fig. 4.6. Size(L) of tactical diameter for gas(LPG/LNG) carriers 109
Fig. 4.7. Size(L) of tactical diameter for PCTC ships 109
Fig. 4.8. Size(L) of tactical diameter for other ships 110
Fig. 4.9. The status for width of channel and bumper zone in TSS 123
Fig. 4.10. The past track of ships in Maemul-suido TSS on September 2019 123
Fig. 4.11. The past track of ships in Maemul-suido TSS on January 2020 124
Fig. 4.12. Distribution of navigation for all ships navigated in the Maemul-suido TSS 125
Fig. 4.13. Distribution of navigation for not less than 50K GT navigated in the Maemul-suido TSS 126
Fig. 4.14. Normal distribution for track of ships at Maemul-suido TSS 127
Fig. 4.15. The status for width of Shiha-hae channel 129
Fig. 4.16. The past track of ships in Shiha-hae channel on September 2019 129
Fig. 4.17. The past track of ships in Shiha-hae channel on January 2020 130
Fig. 4.18. Distribution of navigation for all ships navigated in the Shiha-hae Channel 131
Fig. 4.19. Distribution of navigation for not less than 50K GT navigated in the Shiha-hae channel 132
Fig. 4.20. Normal distribution for track of ships at Channel 133
Fig. 4.21. Distance between wind farm boundaries and shipping routes 135
Fig. 5.1. The verification method for navigation safety model of offshore wind farm and vessel 142
Fig. 5.2. The Location of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 147
Fig. 5.3. Distance between wind farm and TSS for Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 148
Fig. 5.4. Gate line designation for Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 149
Fig. 5.5. Cross relationship status at north water of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 149
Fig. 5.6. Sailing ship(Passenger) of Max. size at north water of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 150
Fig. 5.7. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at north water of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 150
Fig. 5.8. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at north water of Gwynt mor offshore wind farm 151
Fig. 5.9. The Location of Humber gateway offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 155
Fig. 5.10. Distance between wind farm and TSS for Humber gateway offshore wind farm 156
Fig. 5.11. Gate line designation for Humber gateway offshore wind farm 157
Fig. 5.12. Cross relationship status at north water of Humber gateway offshore wind farm 157
Fig. 5.13. Sailing ship(Cargo) of Max. size at north water of Humber gateway offshore wind farm 158
Fig. 5.14. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at north water of Humber gateway offshore wind farm 158
Fig. 5.15. The Location of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms and adjacent harbor 162
Fig. 5.16. Distance between wind farm and TSS for Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 163
Fig. 5.17. Gate line designation for Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 164
Fig. 5.18. Cross relationship status at west water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 164
Fig. 5.19. Sailing ship(Passenger) of Max. size at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 165
Fig. 5.20. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 165
Fig. 5.21. Sailing ship(Dangerous Cargo) of Max. size at between Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 166
Fig. 5.22. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at west water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms(1) 166
Fig. 5.23. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at west water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms(2) 167
Fig. 5.24. Sailing ship(Dangerous Cargo) of Max. size at west water of Greater gabbard offshore wind farms 167
Fig. 5.25. The Location of Borssele offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 176
Fig. 5.26. Distance between wind farm and TSS for Borssele offshore wind farm 177
Fig. 5.27. Gate line designation for Borssele offshore wind farm 178
Fig. 5.28. Cross relationship status at north water of Borssele offshore wind farm 178
Fig. 5.29. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at north water of Borssele offshore wind farm 179
Fig. 5.30. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at north water of Borssele offshore wind farm 179
Fig. 5.31. The Location of offshore wind farm at north/south water of Germany and adjacent harbor 184
Fig. 5.32. Distance between wind farm and TSS for offshore wind farm at the north water of Germany 185
Fig. 5.33. Gate line designation for offshore wind farm at north/south water of Germany 186
Fig. 5.34. Cross relationship status for offshore wind farm at north/south water of Germany 186
Fig. 5.35. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at north water of German offshore wind farm 187
Fig. 5.36. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at north water of German offshore wind farm 187
Fig. 5.37. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at south water of German offshore wind farm 188
Fig. 5.38. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at south water of German offshore wind farm 188
Fig. 5.39. The Location of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 193
Fig. 5.40. Distance between wind farm and channel for Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 194
Fig. 5.41. Gate line designation for Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 195
Fig. 5.42. Cross relationship status at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 195
Fig. 5.43. Sailing ship(Passenger) of Max. size at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 196
Fig. 5.44. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 196
Fig. 5.45. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at north water of Burbo bank & extension offshore wind farm 197
Fig. 5.46. The Location of Borssele offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 201
Fig. 5.47. Distance between wind farm and channel for Borssele offshore wind farm 202
Fig. 5.48. Gate line designation for Borssele offshore wind farm 203
Fig. 5.49. Cross relationship status at south water of Borssele offshore wind farm 203
Fig. 5.50. Sailing ship(CNTR) of Max. size at south-east water of Borssele offshore wind farm 204
Fig. 5.51. Sailing ship(Dangerous cargo) of Max. size at south-east water of Borssele offshore wind farm 204
Fig. 5.52. The Location of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 209
Fig. 5.53. Distance among Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farms 210
Fig. 5.54. Gate line designation for Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm 211
Fig. 5.55. Cross relationship status at south-east water of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm 211
Fig. 5.56. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south-east water of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm 212
Fig. 5.57. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south-east water of Inner dowsing, Lynn and Lincs offshore wind farm 212
Fig. 5.58. The Location of West of duddon sands offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 216
Fig. 5.59. Distance from West of duddon sands offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farms 217
Fig. 5.60. Gate line designation for West of duddon sands offshore wind farm 218
Fig. 5.61. Cross relationship status at south water of West of duddon sands offshore wind farm 218
Fig. 5.62. The track(Passenger) of largest value within 90% range at south water of West of duddon sands offshore wind farm 219
Fig. 5.63. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south water of West of duddon sands offshore wind farm 219
Fig. 5.64. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south water of West of duddon sands offshore wind farm 220
Fig. 5.65. The Location of Walney 1&2 phase, West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 225
Fig. 5.66. Distance from Walney 1&2 phase, North of West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow offshore wind farm 226
Fig. 5.67. Gate line designation for Walney 1&2 phase, north of West of duddon sands, Barrow and Ormonde offshore wind farm 227
Fig. 5.68. Cross relationship status at Walney 1&2 phase, north water of West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow offshore wind farm 227
Fig. 5.69. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at Walney 1&2 phase, West of duddon sands, Ormonde and Barrow offshore wind farm 228
Fig. 5.70. The Location of Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 233
Fig. 5.71. Distance from Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farms 234
Fig. 5.72. Gate line designation for Horn rev 1 offshore wind farm 235
Fig. 5.73. Cross relationship status at south water of Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm 235
Fig. 5.74. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south water of Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm 236
Fig. 5.75. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south water of Horns rev 1 offshore wind farm 236
Fig. 5.76. The Location of Westermost rough offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 241
Fig. 5.77. Distance from Westermost rough offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farm 242
Fig. 5.78. Gate line designation for Westermost rough offshore wind farm 243
Fig. 5.79. Cross relationship status at east water of Westermost rough offshore wind farm 243
Fig. 5.80. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at east water of Westermost rough offshore wind farm 244
Fig. 5.81. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at east water of Westermost rough offshore wind farm 244
Fig. 5.82. The Location of Walney extension offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 249
Fig. 5.83. Distance from Walney extension offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farm 250
Fig. 5.84. Gate line designation for Walney extension offshore wind farm 251
Fig. 5.85. Cross relationship status at South-west water of Walney extension offshore wind farm 251
Fig. 5.86. The track(Passenger) of largest value within 90% range at south-west water of Walney extension offshore wind farm 252
Fig. 5.87. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at south-west water of Walney extension offshore wind farm 252
Fig. 5.88. The Location of Race bank offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 257
Fig. 5.89. Distance from Race bank offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farm 258
Fig. 5.90. Gate line designation for Race bank offshore wind farm 259
Fig. 5.91. Cross relationship status at south water of Race bank offshore wind farm 259
Fig. 5.92. The track(Passenger) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Race bank offshore wind farm 260
Fig. 5.93. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Race bank offshore wind farm 260
Fig. 5.94. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Race bank offshore wind farm 261
Fig. 5.95. The Location of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 268
Fig. 5.96. Distance from Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farm 269
Fig. 5.97. Gate line designation for Race bank offshore wind farm 270
Fig. 5.98. Cross relationship status at south/north water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 270
Fig. 5.99. The track(Passenger) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 271
Fig. 5.100. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 271
Fig. 5.101. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Sheringham shoal offshore wind farm 272
Fig. 5.102. The Location of Dudgeon offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 278
Fig. 5.103. Distance from Dudgeon offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farm 279
Fig. 5.104. Gate line designation for Dudgeon offshore wind farm 280
Fig. 5.105. Cross relationship status at north/south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farm 280
Fig. 5.106. The track(Passenger) of largest value within 90% range at south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farm 281
Fig. 5.107. The track(CNTR) of largest value within 90% range at south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farm 281
Fig. 5.108. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at north and south water of Dudgeon offshore wind farm 282
Fig. 5.109. The Location of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm and adjacent harbor 288
Fig. 5.110. Distance from Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm to adjacent offshore wind farms 289
Fig. 5.111. Gate line designation for Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm 290
Fig. 5.112. Cross relationship status at west water of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm 290
Fig. 5.113. The track(Cargo) of largest value within 90% range at west water of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm 291
Fig. 5.114. The track(Dangerous cargo) of largest value within 90% range at west water of Horns rev 3 offshore wind farm 291
Fig. 5.115. Composition of full mission ship handling simulator 298
Fig. 5.116. Diagram for Concept of ship handling simulator's operating 298
Fig. 5.117. Coordinate system 300
Fig. 5.118. Before and After the development of offshore wind farm at approach waters for harbor 304
Fig. 5.119. Before and After the development of offshore wind farm at open sea 304
Fig. 5.120. Establishment of scenario(Engine trouble) at approach waters for harbor 310
Fig. 5.121. Establishment of scenario(Steering gear trouble) at approach waters for harbor 310
Fig. 5.122. Establishment of scenario for 12K TEU CNTR at open sea 311
Fig. 5.123. Establishment of scenario for 300K DWT VLCC at open sea 312
Fig. 5.124. Establishment of scenario for 70K GT PCTC at open sea 312
Fig. 5.125. The result of lateral size for engine trouble at approach waters for harbor 313
Fig. 5.126. The result of lateral size for steering gear trouble at approach waters for harbor 314
Fig. 5.127. The comparison result of lateral size for emergency situation at approach waters for harbor 315
Fig. 5.128. The result of tactical diameter of ships through the hard-over at open sea(1) 317
Fig. 5.129. The result of tactical diameter of ships through the hard-over at open sea(2) 318
Fig. 5.130. The result of tactical diameter of ships through the hard-over at open sea(3) 319
Fig. 5.131. The result of tactical diameter of ships through the hard-over at open sea(4) 320
Fig. 5.132. The comparison result of tactical diameter through the hard-over at open sea 321