Title Page
ABSTRACT
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction 14
1.1. Background 14
1.2. Problem Statement 17
1.3. Research Questions 19
1.4. Research Objectives 20
1.5. Scope of the Research 20
1.6. Significance of the Research 22
1.7. Operational flow of the Research 23
1.8. Organization of the Research 24
Chapter 2. Literature Review 25
2.1. Definition of Terms 25
2.2. Linking Land use and Transportation 26
2.3. Station area development a way forward to TOD 28
2.4. The TOD Concept 30
2.4.1. Land use mix 32
2.4.2. Advantages of Land Use mix 33
2.4.3. Indicators of TOD measurement 34
2.5. Ethiopia Policy framework for a Transit-oriented development 39
2.5.1. Federal level 40
2.5.2. Regional Level 41
2.6. The Addis Ababa city 10th structural plan[이미지참조] 42
2.6.1. The mixed-use concept of the structural plan 44
2.6.2. The Road and Transportation of the structural plan 47
2.6.3. BRT concept on the structural plan 49
2.7. Conceptual Framework 51
2.8. Summary 52
Chapter 3. Research Methodology and Materials 54
3.1. Description of the Study Area 54
3.2. Data Source 55
3.2.1. Land use 56
3.2.2. Building Height Regulation 57
3.2.3. Road and Transport Map 59
3.2.4. OpenStreet Map (OSM) 62
3.3. Data Analysis Method 63
3.3.1. Data extraction 63
3.3.2. Indicators of measuring potential TOD 66
3.3.3. Computation of the indicators for the potential TOD Station 68
3.3.4. Multi-criteria decision analysis for potential TOD station 73
Chapter 4. Data Analysis and Interpretation 78
4.1. Measuring the land use intensity/density of the BRT B2 corridor 78
4.2. Measuring the land use diversity of the BRT B2 corridor 83
4.3. Measuring the land use mixed-ness of the BRT B2 corridor 85
4.4. Calculating potential TOD station using MCDA 86
4.4.1. Pairwise comparison and assessment of criteria weighting 87
4.4.2. Potential TOD Station Ranking BRT-B2 90
4.4.3. Spatial statistical analysis 93
4.4.4. Global Moran's I statistic 93
4.4.5. Getis-Ord Gi statistics hotspot analysis 95
4.5. Compare the result of TOD potential to the 10th structural plan proposal[이미지참조] 97
Chapter 5. Discussion and Conclusion 101
5.1. Discussion 101
5.2. Conclusion 105
5.3. Recommendation for future study 106
References 108
Appendix 112
초록 115
Table 1. Residential unit share in buildings 46
Table 2. Structural plan land use proportion 47
Table 3. Zoning and Building Height Regulation Provisions 59
Table 4. Structural plan 15 Bus rapid transit BRT route 61
Table 5. First land use classification from source data 64
Table 6. Reclassification of POI 66
Table 7. Criteria for calculating the potential TOD station. 67
Table 8. Fundamental weighting scale by Satty (1990) 75
Table 9. Evaluation criteria for potential TOD rating 77
Table 10. Land use diversity and mix 86
Table 11. Experts weighting value. 89
Figure 1. Addis Ababa Public Transport Routes 22
Figure 2. Research Design 23
Figure 3. Land use conceptual plan 45
Figure 4. Conceptual Framework diagram 51
Figure 5. Study area map: BRT-B2 corridor area 55
Figure 6. Addis Ababa 10th Structural Plan Land Use Map[이미지참조] 57
Figure 7. Structural plan Building Height Map 58
Figure 8. BRT B2 kernel density estimation 71
Figure 9. Kernel Density Estimate Residential 79
Figure 10. Kernal density estimate Activity 79
Figure 11. KDE for each station 80
Figure 12. Land use diversity 84
Figure 13. survey result for profession and experience of experts 88
Figure 14. weighted overlay analysis result for potential TOD station 92
Figure 15. Global Moran's I statistics spatial autocorrelation analysis result 94
Figure 16. Getis-Ord Gi hotspot statistics map 96
Figure 17. Hotspot map for Potential TOD 97
Figure 18. 10th Structural plan land use proposal[이미지참조] 97
Figure 19. Hotspot map and imagery comparison for Anuar Mosque and Sengatera stations 98
Figure 20. Jemo Mikael station potential TOD hotspot map and structural plan comparison 99
Figure 21. Hotspot map and imagery comparison for Jemo Mikael stations 100
Equation 1. Kernal Density Estimate 68
Equation 2. Entropy Index 72
Equation 3. Mix Index 73
Equation 4. Consistency Ratio Index 76
Equation 5. Consistency Index 76