The purpose of the study is to explore alternatives for evaluating subject and non-subject areas in a transcript by high school teachers' perception for the college admission. The research questions as follow: First of all, what do teachers perceive the reasonable way to evaluate students’ potentials in subject areas? Additionally, what do teachers perceive the reasonable way to evaluate students’ potentials in non-subject areas? Survey and focus group interview were employed for the study methods. 266 teachers from sixteen high schools part took in the survey. Sixteen schools are sampled from each four different districts. 6 senior teachers participated in the focus group interview. In the survey results, weighting on electives which are related in departmental major was proposed as a supplementary method. Awards, certification or license, and reading lists are high ranked as scales to discriminate students’ potential in non-subject areas. 59% of the teachers responded that a volunteer activity is the most important factor to evaluate non-subject areas. About 58% of the teachers prefer to choose an essay as supplementary data to assess students’ potentials. In the results of the focus group interviews, senior teachers suggested observation and group interview method to select students in the form of camp for the freshman candidates. It is necessary to develope scales to evaluate additional data such as a portfolio and essay in non-subject area. The study results provided significant and useful data for college admission counseling in high school teachers, too.