끝으로 본고의 가치는 <인간교실> 분석을 통해 손창섭의 작품세계를 1960년대까지 확장한 데서 찾을 수 있겠다. 대부분의 논자들이 손창섭의 1960년대 장편들을 순수문학의 ‘주변’으로 치부해버렸는데, 인간의 욕망은 시대를 초월한다고 할 수 있는바, 따라서 1960년대의 작품분석이 병행되어야만 손창섭 해석의 스펙트럼은 확장될 것이고, 한국문학사에서의 위치와 작품세계의 독창성도 구축될 것이다.In this article, I try to study the meaning and the Dual-structure of eye in Shon, Chang-sup's A Classroom of Human Beings. In this text, written in 1964, we can find some characters who try to make relationships with Others intend to express their unconscious desires hidden inside through ‘bare faces.’ At this moment, the repetition of the pain which they just have to see secretly what they desire is inherent in the peeping eyes of the characters. Because of the taboo, you can put fantasy into the eye that looks objects. On the other hand, there is a meaning of trying to make Subject a moral and ethical ego in the watching eye. Sometimes, this makes Subject difficult to keep a proper relationship in the Symbolic working as a gaze of the scary Other.
Finally, we can find the significance of this article at the extension of the work of Shon, Chan-sup up to the 1960s. Most of the debaters considered the long pieces of Shon, Chan-sup as ‘side’ of pure literature. However, because we can say that the desire cut across eras, the spectrum of studying Shon, Chang-sup would be extended when we break the boundary of 1950s. Also, that will change its place in the history of Korean literature and will renew its literary originality.