본 연구는 특수학교 국민공통 기본교육과정 학업성취도평가 실태와 향후 과제를 제시하기위한 목적으로 실행되었다. 연구 목적을 해결하기 위해서 첫째, 국가수준의 국민공통 기본교육과정을 적용하고 있는 시각장애·청각장애·지체장애 특수학교와 일반학교에 배치된 특수교육 대상학생의 학업성취도평가 실태에 근거한 적합성 방향은 무엇인가? 둘째, 감각장애특수학교, 일반학교 특수교육 대상학생 학업성취도평가 운영의 적합성은 확보되었는가? 셋째, 국가수준 학업성취도평가에는 어떤 문제점을 가지고 있는가? 넷째, 특수교육 대상학생국가수준 학업성취도평가 적합성 확보를 위한 향후 과제는 무엇인가? 로 설정하여 진행되었다. 이와 같은 연구 목적을 해결하기 위해, 국가수준의 학업성취도평가의 국내ㆍ외 문헌과선행연구, 심층면접을 통해 이루어졌다. 본 연구의 결론으로, 한국적 상황을 고려하여 국민공통 기본교육과정 적용 특수교육 대상학생 학업성취도평가를 위한 향후 과제를 7가지로 제시하였다. 따라서 본 연구는 지금까지국가수준 학업성취도평가에서 제외되었던 특수교육 대상학생의 평가 참여 의무화가 되고 있는 시점에서 정책연구의 기초자료로서 역할을 할 수 있을 것이다.The purpose of this study was to present the actual state of an academic achievement test and the suggestions of improvement for students with special needs applied by the national common basic curriculum. Research questions set for the purpose were as follows. First, what is the suitability directions based on the actual state of the academic achievement test for students with special needs applied by the national common basic curriculum who are placed in regular schools or special schools. Second, has the suitability of evaluation administration of the academic achievement test for students in regular schools or in special schools for the hearing or visually impaired been secured? Third, what are the problems in the national level academic achievement tests? Fourth, what are the suggestions of improvement to secure the suitability of the national level academic achievement test for students in special needs?For the purpose of this study, the domestic and foreign literature reviews of the national level academic achievement tests and in-depth interviews were used. As the suggestions of improvement for the academic achievement test of students with special needs applied by the national common basic curriculum, the followings are presented. First, the diverse types of academic achievement tests at the national level should be developed for full integration and extension in the academic achievement test for students in special needs. Second, overall reassessment for the suitability of special guidelines for students with special needs in the college scholastic ability test is required. Third, a model needs to be developed for evaluation accommodation relating to the development of test items in the national level academic achievement test and the college scholastic ability test. Fourth, a base that can apply anytime the standards of the evaluation accommodation of the national level academic achievement test is required in the academic achievement test for students in regular schools or in special schools for the hearing or visually impaired. Fifth,'the law of evaluation integration and accommodation for students in special needs' should be enacted to secure the necessity of evaluation participation and integration for all students in special needs. Sixth, the supporting system of the national level academic achievement test for students in special needs is to be built. Seventh, the law to require re-placement in a certain time after school placement needs to be enacted to increase the integration of students with special needs into regular school curriculum. Last, the increase of the accountability of special education teachers to the results of the academic achievement test is required.