본 연구는 장애인의 사회통합에 절실히 필요한 장애인활동보조서비스 지원을 위한 지자체의 장애인활동보조 추가지원 사업의 현황을 파악하고, 길버트 & 스펙트럼의 정책분석틀에 의거하여 활동보조서비스 추가지원사업의 현실적 문제와 이에 따른 활성화방안을 마련하고자 했다. 조사 결과, 대상자 선정기준은 장애등급, 최중증 장애인, 독거장애인 등에게 주로 추가적인 시간을 지원, 급여(서비스)의 량은 최소 10∼230시간, 급여(서비스)내용은 국고보조와 거의 동일적용, 결재방식은 수작업으로 관리운영(7.27%), 추가지원 예산출처는 시·도 및 시·군·구의 예산을 매칭 지원(43.9%), 연간 예산은 2억원 이상(55.3%)이 가장 많았다. 이러한 연구결과에 근거하여, 본 연구에서의 활성화 방안은 대상자 선정기준의 다양화, 지역사회의 정확한 욕구파악, 장애유형을 고려한 형평성 는 대상자 선정기준, 국고지원과의 서비스 내용 차별화, 지역별 특성을 고려한 전달체계 모형개발, 명확한 법적 근거 마련, 국고지원과의 통합성을 고려한 관리·운영체계마련 등이다. 따라서 본 연구는 국고지원 장애인활동보조사업의 사각지대를 해소하기 위한 추가지원사업의 활성화방안을 모색하였다는 데서 그 의의를 찾을 수 있다.This study aims to figure out present condition of additional support for personal assistant services(PAS) funded by local governments, and to consider its problems through comparison with nation-funded PAS. The authors analyze the results in accordance with analytic framework designed by Gilbert and Spectrum. The questionnaires were sent out to civil servants of 246 cities and counties, who are in charge of public administration on additional support of PAS, and 93% of them collected. The research surveys about the number of service users, quantity of additional support of PAS, requirements for the service, accreditation standards for the service, types of services, service providers, assessment agencies, annual budget, source of budget, execution of budget, service providing fee of the agencies etc. The main results of the research can be summarized as follows. Firstly, the number of service users is 39 thousands. Secondly, 34.6% of cities and councils use a form for service accreditation, and the rest do not. And the service is provided according to impairment rate, disability severeness, solitude and so on. Quantity of services(time of PAS) varies from 70~300, the cost of service unit is 8,000won as average. Thirdly, most of the cities and councils do not have voucher system, which runs state-aid PAS. Instead they administer the service with manual labour. Fourthly, the highest rate of the answer of the question regarding source of budget indicates the fact that local governments provide the service through the cities and councils' matching fund. And most local governments spend over 200,000 thousand won per year, The problem shown in results can be summarized into three facts. The first is that the additional service cannot solve the problem of nation-funded PAS, limited number of service users, the second is that the quality of the service is never better than nation-funded service, the third is lack of budget. Considering the results this study suggests firstly diversification of accreditation standard, secondly accurate need assessment, thirdly differentiation of the services, fourthly development of new service operation system.