The aim of this writing is to compare the concepts of absurdity which are presented in the works of the two authors: Albert Camus's The Outsider and The Myth of Sisyphus and Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot and Happy Days. Both authors describe an absurd situation in which human beings want to clearly define themselves and the world, but the irrational world does not answer to their desire for meaning. A person who feels absurd is given two choices. They can plan to escape from an absurd world or choose to remain in search of the meaning of an absurd life. The method to escape the absurdity, described in Beckett's and Camus' works, is through suicide. Camus criticizes suicide, pointing out that suicide is nothing more than an act of confessing that one's life was worthless, however, Beckett points out that humans are weak beings who have no choice but to live an absurd life, because the fear of death is stronger than the pain of absurdity. A man who stays in an absurd world will try to find meaning in his life. Camus argues that humans can never find the meaning of life because it does not exist. The characters in Beckett's plays constantly explore what their's and others' lives mean, but alas remain inconclusive. Therefore, Camus and Beckett both emphasize that we must live an absurd life, not seeking a solution to the absurd.