[표제지 등]
제출문
요약문
SUMMARY
List of Table
List of Figure
목차
제1장 서론 19
제1절 연구개발의 필요성 19
제2절 연구개발 목표 및 내용 21
1. 연구개발의 최종목표 21
2. 연차별 연구개발 목표 및 내용 21
제2장 의사결정방법의 선정 23
제1절 개요 23
제2절 계층분석법 (AHP : Analytic Hierarchy Process) 24
1. 계층분석법의 구성 24
2. 일대일 비교(Pairwise Comparison) 26
제3절 퍼지이론 32
1. 퍼지 집합 32
2. 퍼지관계 34
3. 가능성이론 35
제4절 전문가 시스템 37
1. 전문가 시스템의 필요성 및 특성 37
2. 전문가 시스템의 구조 38
3. 전문가 시스템에서의 불확실성 44
4. 규칙충돌 해결(Rule Conflict Resolution) 45
5. 환경분야의 전문가 시스템 46
제3장 처리공법선정시스템의 구성 53
제1절 시스템의 흐름 및 구조 53
1. 시스템의 흐름 53
2. 시스템 구조 56
제2절 데이타 베이스 설계 57
1. 수질환경 및 지역특성 데이타 베이스 57
2. 처리공법특성 데이타 베이스 65
제4장 지역 및 처리공법의 특성조사 67
제1절 대상유역 선정 67
1. 대상유역 선정 67
2. 유역분할 70
제2절 수질환경 및 지역특성 조사 74
1. 규모별 하수량 및 부하량 측정 74
2. 하천수 수질조사 78
3. 지하수 수질조사 79
제3절 오염물질 처리공법의 특성조사 82
1. 소규모 오수처리공법의 종류 82
2. 각종 처리공법의 특성조사 87
제5장 시스템구성인자 분석 및 시스템구축 95
제1절 처리 대책의 긴급도 판정 95
1. 목표수질의 설정 95
2. 처리대책의 긴급도 판정 97
제2절 처리대상유역의 우선순위 선정 100
1. 우선순위결정 인자분석 100
2. 시스템 구축 106
제3절 개별공동처리의 판정 108
1. 처리형태 판정시스템의 구성인자 108
2. 처리형태 판정시스템 구축 110
3. 처리형태 판정시스템 구축예 113
제4절 처리공법의 선정 118
1. 처리공법선정 평가기준 118
2. 처리공법 선정 시스템 구축 120
3. 처리공법 선정 시스템 구축예 124
제6장 결론 129
참고문헌 131
[title page etc.]
Contents
Chapter 1. Introduction 19
Section 1. Requisite of study 19
Section 2. Objective and scope of study 21
1. Final objective of study 21
2. Objective and scope of study on different year 21
Chapter 2. The selection of decision making method 23
Section 1. Consideration 23
Section 2. Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) 24
1. Component of AHP 24
2. Pairwise comparison 26
Section 3. Fuzzy theory 32
1. Fuzzy set 32
2. Fuzzy reaction 34
3. Possibility theory 35
Section 4. Expert system 37
1. Requisite(Requsisite) and characteristics of expert system 37
2. Structure of expert system 38
3. Uncertainty of expert system 44
4. Rule conflict resolution 45
5. Expert system on environmental fields 46
Chapter 3. System components for selection of treatment process 53
Section 1. Flow and structure of system 53
1. Flow of system 53
2. Structure of system 56
Section 2. Design of data base 57
1. Data base design on regional and water quality characteristics 57
2. Data base design on treatment process characteristics 65
Chapter 4. Survey on regional and treatment process characteristics 67
Section 1. Selection of study basin 67
1. Selection of study basin 67
2. District of study basin 70
Section 2. Survey on regional and water quality characteristics 74
1. Flowrate and pollutant loading of domestic wastewater on population scale 74
2. Survey of water quality on stream 78
3. Survey of groundwater quality on basin 79
Section 3. Survey on treatment process characteristics 82
1. Classification of treatment process for small scale 82
2. Survey of characteristics for different treatment process 87
Chapter 5. Component analysis and build-up of system 95
Section 1. Decision of necessity for pollutant reduction 95
1. Set up of water quality standard 95
2. Decision of necessity for pollutant reduction 97
Section 2. Priority evaluation(evalution) of basin for treatment 100
1. Components analysis for decision of priority basin 100
2. Build-up of system 106
Section 3. Decision of treatment type 108
1. Components for decision of treatment type 108
2. Build-up for decision of treatment type 110
3. Instance(Instnace) for decision of treatment type 113
Section 4. Selection of treatment process 118
1. Evaluation factors on selection of treatment process 118
2. Build-up of system for selection of treatment process 120
3. Instance for selection of treatment process 124
Chapter 6. Conclusion 129
Reference 131
Table 1-1. Objective and scope of study on each year 22
Table 2-1. Expert systems on environmental fields 46
Table 3-1. DATA BASE form for characteristics of treatment process 66
Table 4-1. Status of pollutant sources of Bocha and Yanghwa stream 69
Table 4-2. Pollutant load of BOD discharged from Bocha and Yanghwa stream 69
Table 4-3. Classification of small basins on streams 70
Table 4-4. Average concentration for pollutants of survey areas 74
Table 4-5. Peak/Avg. ratio for pollutant mass loading of survey areas 74
Table 4-6. The results of water quality on Bocha and Yanghwa stream 79
Table 4-7. The results of ground water quality of Bocha and Yanghwa Basin 80
Table 4-8. Classification of treatment process for small scale 82
Table 4-9. Characteristic of extended aeration process 88
Table 4-10. Characteristic of standard actived sludge process 89
Table 4-11. Characteristic of aerobic biofilm reactor 90
Table 4-12. Characteristic of tricking filter 91
Table 4-13. Characteristic of rotating biological contactor(RBC) 92
Table 4-14. Characteristic of oxidation ditch 93
Table 4-15. Characteristic of sequencing batch reactor(SBR) 94
Table 5-1. Water quality standard for stream 97
Table 5-2. Classification of factors for selection of optimum treatment process 119
Figure 2-1. The standard form of the decision hierarchy 25
Figure 2-2. Structure of expert system 38
Figure 3-1. Flow of the system 55
Figure 3-2. Structure of the system 56
Figure 4-1. Sampling sites of small basins 73
Figure 4-2. Concentration and mass-loading variability for BOD, SS, TN, and TP of Ochun-Ri 75
Figure 4-3. Concentration and mass-loading variability for BOD, SS, TN, and TP of Sinji-Ri 76
Figure 4-4. Concentration and mass-loading variability for BOD, SS, TN, and TP of Bundo-Ri 77
Figure 5-1. Display of data base for water quality monitoring stations 98
Figure 5-2. Display for necessity decision on pollutant reduction of Bocha stream 99
Figure 5-3. Display for water quality variation of Bocha stream 100
Figure 5-4. Display for factor analysis of priority basin having to treat 107
Figure 5-5. Display for complex decision of priority basin having to treat 107
Figure 5-6. Display for optional selection of basin having to treat 108
Figure 5-7. Types of dwelling area 110
Figure 5-8. The form of decision hierarchy for this study 111
Figure 5-9. Display for a decision of treatment type with 1st level 114
Figure 5-10. Display for pariwise comparison 115
Figure 5-11. Display for the results of consistency ratio from pariwise comparison 115
Figure 5-12. Display for a decision of treatment type with 2nd level 116
Figure 5-13. Display for pariwise comparison of each factor 117
Figure 5-14. Display for selection of optimum treatment type 117
Figure 5-15. Display for selection of priority factor 124