[표제지 등]
제출문
요약문
ABSTRACT
List of Table
List of Figure
목차
제1장 서론 23
제2장 축산폐기물의 발생 및 처리 25
2.1. 축산폐기물의 발생 25
2.2. 축산 폐기물의 처리 27
2.2.1. 처리 방법 27
2.2.2. 문제점 31
제3장 축산폐기물의 퇴비화 34
3.1. 퇴비화의 필요성 34
3.2. 퇴비화의 이론 35
3.3. 퇴비화 처리장치 50
3.3.1. 국내 50
3.3.2. 미국 50
3.3.3. 일본 69
제4장 퇴비화 실험 77
4.1. 실험 방법 78
4.1.1. 대상 폐기물 78
4.1.2. 실험 장치 78
4.1.3. 분석 방법 80
4.1.4. 실험 조건 82
4.2. 결과 및 고찰 84
4.2.1. 축분 및 Bulking Agents의 성상 85
4.2.2. Bulking Agent에 따른 영향 87
4.2.3. 수분함량에 따른 영향 96
4.2.4. 온도제어에 따른 영향 106
4.2.5. 퇴비 재순환역 따른 영향 122
제5장 결론 132
제6장 참고자료 135
6.1. 국문 135
6.2. 영문 136
6.3. 일문 140
부록 141
[title page etc.]
Contents
Chapter(Chater) 1. Introduction 23
Chapter(Chater) 2. Generation and Treatment of Livestock Waste 25
2.1. Generation of Livestock Waste 25
2.2. Treatment of Livestock Waste 27
2.2.1. Method of Treatment 27
2.2.2. Problem 31
Chapter(Chater) 3. Composting Livestock Waste 34
3.1. Necessity of Composting 34
3.2. Theory of Composting 35
3.3. Treatment Facilites for Composting 50
3.3.1. Korea 50
3.3.2. U.S.A 50
3.3.3. Japan 69
Chapter(Chater) 4. Composting Experiment 77
4.1. Experimental Methods 78
4.1.1. Raw Waste 78
4.1.2. Experimental Device 78
4.1.3. Method of Analysis 80
4.1.4. Experimental Condition 82
4.2. Results and Discussion 84
4.2.1. Characteristics of Livestock Waste and Bulking Agent 85
4.2.2. Effects of Bulking Agent 87
4.2.3. Effects of Moisture Content 96
4.2.4. Effects of Temperature Control 106
4.2.5. Effects of Compost Recycle 122
Chapter(Chater) 5. Conclusions 132
Chapter(Chater) 6. References 135
6.1. Korean 135
6.2. English 136
6.3. Japanese 140
Appendixes 141
(Table 2.1) Livestock status and waste generation in the last five years 25
(Table 2.2) Comparison of advantages and disadvantages(disadventages) in the existing treatment methods 32
(Table 3.1) Characteristics of composting materials 40
(Table 3.2) General chemical equations of varying organics 42
(Table 3.3) Dead temperature of general pathogenics and insects 43
(Table 4.1) Characteristics of livestock waste and bulking agent 86
(Table 4.2) Results of composting cow manure with bulking agent 88
(Table 4.3) Results of composting pig manure with bulking agent 90
(Table 4.4) Characteristics of compost of livestock waste with bulking agent 95
(Table 4.5) Results of compost of cow manure with moisture content 97
(Table 4.6) Results of compost of pig manure with moisture content 102
(Table 4.7) Characteristics of compost of livestock waste with moisture content 106
(Table 4.8) Results of compost of cow manure with 50 ℃ controlled 110
(Table 4.9) Results of compost of pig manure with 50 ℃ controlled 112
(Table 4.10) Characteristics of compost of livestock waste with 50 ℃ controlled 115
(Table 4.11) Results of compost of cow manure with 60 ℃ controlled 116
(Table 4.12) Results of compost of pig manure with 60 ℃ controlled 118
(Table 4.13) Characteristics of compost of livestock waste with 60 ℃ controlled 118
(Table 4.14) Results of compost cow manure with compost recycle 124
(Table 4.15) Results of compost of pig manure with compost recycle 127
(Table 4.16) Characteristics of compost of livestock waste with compost recycle 130
(Figure 2.1) Livestock status in the last five years 26
(Figure 2.2) Generation of livestock waste('91) 26
(Figure 3.1) Growth steps of microorganism with composting 36
(Figure 3.2) Biological chain of composting process 39
(Figure 3.3) Variation of temperature and pH in composting process 44
(Figure 3.4) Principles of Gel-Chromatograph 49
(Figure 3.5) Vertical plug-flow reactors 52
(Figure 3.6) Horizontal plug-flow reactors 53
(Figure 3.7) Agitaed ved reacters 53
(Figure 3.8) Partial diagram metro-waste system resource conversion system, inc 54
(Figure 3.9) Typical layout of a cano bio-stabilizer plant 55
(Figure 3.10) Bav bioreactor 56
(Figure 3.11) Extractoveyor at akron facility 58
(Figure 3.12) Purac reactor cape may 61
(Figure 3.13) Taulman composting system reactor 64
(Figure 3.14) Ashbrook composting system 66
(Figure 3.15) Cross section of a fairfiled reactor 67
(Figure 3.16) Aniericam bio tech reactor at schenectady plant 67
(Figure 3.17) Portland reactor outfeed device 68
(Figure 3.18) Purac reactor, cape may. 69
(Figure 3.19) Scoop type reactor 71
(Figure 3.20) Horizontal scoope type reactor 72
(Figure 3.21) Horizontal pedal type reactor 72
(Figure 3.22) Horizontal pedal type reactor 73
(Figure 3.23) Vertical type o-ga reactor 73
(Figure 3.24) Vertical pedal type reactor 74
(Figure 3.25) Vertical type multistage falling reactor 75
(Figure 3.26) Vertical type multistage reactor 76
(Figure 4.1) Schematic of reactor for composting 79
(Figure 4.2) Variations of temperature with bulking agent.(cowmanure:C-1,C-2) 89
(Figure 4.3) Variations of pH with bulling agent.(cow manure:C-1,C-2) 89
(Figure 4.4) Variations of temperature with bulking agent.(pig manure:P-1,P-2) 91
(Figure 4.5) Variations of pH with bulling agent(pig manure:P-1,P-2) 91
(Figure 4.6) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-1 93
(Figure 4.7) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-2 93
(Figure 4.8) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-1 94
(Figure 4.9) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-2 94
(Figure 4.10) Variations of temperature with bulking agent.(cow manure C-3,C-4,C-5) 98
(Figure 4.11) pH variations of composting with moisture content.(cow manure C-3,C-4,C-5) 98
(Figure 4.12) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-3 100
(Figure 4.13) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-4 100
(Figure 4.14) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-5 101
(Figure 4.15) Variations of temperature with moisture content.(pig manure:P-3,P-4,P-5) 103
(Figure 4.16) Variations of pH with moisture content.(pig manure:P-3,P-4,P-5) 103
(Figure 4.17) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-3 104
(Figure 4.18) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-4 104
(Figure 4.19) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-5 105
(Figure 4.20) Variations of temperature with 50 ℃ controlled.(cow manure:C-6, C-7) 109
(Figure 4.21) Variations of pH with 50 ℃ controlled.(cow manure:C-6,C-7) 109
(Figure 4.22) Variations of temperature with 50 ℃ controlled.(P-6,P-7) 111
(Figure 4.23) Variations of pH with 50 ℃ controlled.(pig manure:P-6,P-7) 111
(Figure 4.24) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-6 113
(Figure 4.25) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-7 113
(Figure 4.26) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-6 114
(Figure 4.27) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-7 114
(Figure 4.28) Variations of temperature with 60 ℃ controlled.(cow manure:C-8, C-9) 117
(Figure 4.29) Variations of pH with 60 ℃ controlled.(cow manure:C-8,C-9) 117
(Figure 4.30) Variations of temperature with 60 ℃ controlled.(pig manure:P-8, P-9) 119
(Figure 4.31) Variations of pH with 60 ℃ controlled.(pig manure:P-8,P-9) 119
(Figure 4.32) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-8 120
(Figure 4.33) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-9 120
(Figure 4.34) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-8 121
(Figure 4.35) Results of gel-chromatograph in P-9 121
(Figure 4.36) Variations of temperature with compost recyle.(cow manure:C-10,C-11) 125
(Figure 4.37) Variations of pH with compost recyle.(cow manure:C-10,C-11) 125
(Figure 4.38) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-10 126
(Figure 4.39) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-11 126
(Figure 4.40) Variations of temperature with compost recyle.(pig manure:P-10,P-11) 128
(Figure 4.41) Variations of pH with compost recyle.(pig manure:P-10,P-11) 128
(Figure 4.42) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-10 129
(Figure 4.43) Results of gel-chromatograph in C-11 129