목차
[표제지 등]=0,1,2
요약=i,3,9
목차=x,12,3
Contents=xiii,15,3
List of tables=xv,18,3
List of figures=xix,21,2
Abstract=xxi,23,1
I. 서론=1,24,2
II. 유해대기오염물질 규제 및 관리=3,26,1
1. 유해대기오염물질의 정의=3,26,2
2. 국내ㆍ외 유해대기오염물질 관리 현황=5,28,1
가. 국내 관리 현황=5,28,2
나. 미국의 관리 현황=7,30,7
다. 일본의 관리 현황=14,37,1
3. 국내 배출실태 및 특성=15,38,1
가. 공단지역의 환경대기주 유해대기오염물질 수준=15,38,10
나. 화학물질 배출량 조사(TRI) 결과 분석=25,48,14
다. 대기배출원(SODAM) DB 분석결과=39,62,10
라. 대기정책지원시스템(CAPSS)의 VOC 배출량 분석=49,72,6
마. 유해대기오염물질 배출사업장 실태조사=55,78,3
바. 국내와 미국의 유해대기오염물질 배출특성 비교=58,81,3
III. 유해대기오염물질 배출원 시범조사=61,84,1
1. 조사대상 유해대기오염물질=61,84,1
2. 조사대상 물질의 물리ㆍ화학적 특성=62,85,1
가. 벤젠=62,85,2
나. 포름알데히드=63,86,2
다. 아세트알데히드=64,87,1
라. 염화수소=64,87,2
마./다 불소화물=65,88,2
3. 조사대상 사업장의 선정=67,90,2
가. 벤젠 배출특성 조사=69,92,6
나. 알데히드류 측정 사업장=74,97,4
다. 불소화합물 측정 사업장=77,100,4
라. 폐기물 소각시설=80,103,2
4. 유해대기오염물질의 측정ㆍ분석방법=82,105,1
가. 벤젠=82,105,1
나. 알데히드류=83,106,1
다. 불소화합물=84,107,1
라. 염화수소=85,108,2
IV. 유해대기오염물질 배출특성 실측조사 결과=87,110,1
1. 유해대기오염물질 측정결과=87,110,1
가. 벤젠=87,110,3
나. 알데히드류=89,112,3
다. 불소화합물=92,115,2
라. 폐기물 소각시설=93,116,2
2. 유해대기오염물질 배출계수 산정결과=95,118,1
가. 배출계수 산정방법=95,118,1
나. 벤젠=96,119,3
다. 알데히드류=98,121,3
라. 불소화합물=100,123,3
마. 염화수소=102,125,3
3. 폐기물 소각시설의 유해대기오염물질 배출량 추정=105,128,1
가. 폐기물 소각현황=105,128,3
나. 폐기물 소각시설에서의 유해대기오염물질 배출량 추정=108,131,3
V. 점오염원의 유해대기오염물질 중ㆍ장기 연구계획=111,134,1
1. 기본 방향=111,134,2
2. 중ㆍ장기 조사계획=112,135,3
VI. 결론=115,138,1
1. 유해대기오염물질 배출현황 분석결과=115,138,4
2. 유해대기오염물질 배출사업장에 대한 실측조사 결과=118,141,3
3. 점오염원의 중ㆍ장기 조사계획 수립=120,143,3
참고문헌=123,146,2
부록=125,148,2
Table 1. 분기별 입자상물질 분석결과(유해대기오염물질 측정망 자료)=127,150,2
Table 2. VOCS(이미지참조) 20종 분석결과(유해대기오염물질 측정망 자료)=129,152,3
Table 3. 업종별·물질별 화학물질 배출량(TRI 2001 자료)=132,155,12
Table 4. 배출원 소분류별 VOC5(이미지참조) 배출량(CAPSS 2001 자료)=144,167,3
연구사업 참여자=147,170,1
영문목차
[title page etc.]=0,1,14
I. Introduction=1,24,2
II. Regulation and Management system of HAPs=3,26,1
1. Definition of HAPs=3,26,2
2. Management status of HAPs=5,28,1
가. Management status of HAPs in Korea=5,28,2
나. Management status of HAPs in U.S.A=7,30,7
다. Management status of HAPs in Japan=14,37,1
3. Present status and Characteristics of HAPs emissions in Korea=15,38,1
가. Level of HAPs in amdient air of industrial complex=15,38,10
나. Analysis of TRI results=25,48,14
다. Analysis of SODAM data=39,62,10
라. Analysis of VOCs emission in CAPSS=49,72,6
마. A Questionnaire investigation of Metropolitan area=55,78,3
바. Comparison of emission characteristics between Korea and U.S.a=58,81,3
III. Case study of HAPs sources=61,84,1
1. Selected pollutants for investigation=61,84,1
2. Physical and chemical characteristics=62,85,1
가. Benzene=62,85,2
나. Formaldehyde=63,86,2
다. Acetaldehyde=64,87,1
라. Hydrogen chloride=64,87,2
마./다 Fluorides=65,88,2
3. Selected facilities for investigation=67,90,2
가. Benzene=69,92,6
나. Aldehydes=74,97,4
다. Fluorides=77,100,4
라. Waste incinerator=80,103,2
4. Sampling and analysis method=82,105,1
가. Benzene=82,105,1
나. Aldehydes=83,106,1
다. Fluorides=84,107,1
라. Hydrogen chloride=85,108,2
IV. Results of HAPs emission characteristics=87,110,1
1. Results of HAPs measurement=87,110,1
가. Benzene=87,110,3
나. Aldehydes=89,112,3
다. Fluorides=92,115,2
라. Waste incinerator=93,116,2
2. Results of estimated HAPs emission factors=95,118,1
가. Estimating method=95,118,1
나. Benzene=96,119,3
다. Aldehydes=98,121,3
라. Fluorides=100,123,3
마. Hydrogen chloride=102,125,3
3. Estimated emission rate from waste incinerator=105,128,1
가. Waste incineration data=105,128,3
나. Estimated emission rate=108,131,3
V. Long-term investigation plan for HAPs in point sources=111,134,1
1. Basic principle=111,134,2
2. Long-term investigation plan=112,135,3
VI. Conclusion=115,138,8
References=123,146,2
Appendices=125,148,23
Table 2-1. Characteristics of HAPs and CAPs=4,27,1
Table 2-2. HAP's list by the Air Preservation Law=6,29,1
Table 2-3. US. EPA HAP list(188 compounds)=10,33,4
Table 2-4. Integrated urban HAP's list in US(33 compounds)=13,36,1
Table 2-5. Prioritized HAP list in Japan(22 compounds)=14,37,1
Table 2-6. HAP measurement plan in the chemical complex area on 1995,2000=15,38,1
Table 2-7. A status of HAP measurement site=16,39,1
Table 2-8. VOCs measurement list=17,40,1
Table 2-9. HAP measurement methods=18,41,1
Table 2-10. A results of ambient bheavy-metal mean conc. in each measurement site(2001~2003)=20,43,1
Table 2-11. Categories of TRI investigation in 2001=26,49,1
Table 2-12. Status of TRI investigation facilities=26,49,1
Table 2-13. Contribution of toxic chemicals emission sources=27,50,1
Table 2-14. 25 Toxic chemicals Emission rate from TRI DB=28,51,1
Table 2-15. 25 Toxic chemicals Emission rate for each groups=29,52,1
Table 2-16. Toxic chemicals Emission status in each manufacturing categories=30,53,1
Table 2-17. Toxic chemicals Emission status in each units=31,54,1
Table 2-18. Toxic chemicals Emission status in each products=32,55,2
Table 2-19. Toxic chemicals Emission status in Korea=34,57,1
Table 2-20. Toxic chemicals Emission status in each chemical complexes=35,58,1
Table 2-21. Emission rates of regulated special air Toxics(25 compounds)=36,59,1
Table 2-22. Emission rates of regulated special air Toxics in each manufacturing categories=37,60,2
Table 2-23. Current status of air emission sources(1~3 class)=40,63,1
Table 2-24. Number of air emission sources by 1st categories=41,64,1
Table 2-25. Number of air emission sources by 2nd categories=42,65,1
Table 2-26. Yearly emission rates of regulated special air Toxics from SODAM DB(25 compounds)=43,66,1
Table 2-27. HAP emission rate from 1st categories(SODAM)=44,67,1
Table 2-28. HAP emission rate of manufacturing industries(SODAM)=45,68,1
Table 2-29. HAP contributions of major emission sources(2001)=46,69,1
Table 2-30. HAP contributions of major emission sources(2002)=47,70,1
Table 2-31. HAP contributions in each major chemical complexes(2001)=48,71,1
Table 2-32. Status of a sending and receiving questionnaire=55,78,1
Table 2-33. Comparison of HAP emission between Korea and us=58,81,2
Table 3-1. Selected Pollutants for investigation=61,84,1
Table 3-2. Selected facilities and target materials for field test=67,90,2
Table 3-3. Characteristics of Municipal Waste Incinerator=81,104,1
Table 3-4. Analytical conditions of ATD 400 and GC/FID=82,105,1
Table 3-5. Analytical conditions of HPLC=83,106,1
Table 4-1. Actual measurement data of Benzene in each facility=88,111,1
Table 4-2. Actual measurement data of Aldehyde in each facility=90,113,1
Table 4-3. Actual measurement data of Fluoric Compounds in each facility=92,115,1
Table 4-4. Actual measurement data in Municipal Waste Incinerator=94,117,1
Table 4-5. Unit of Emission Factor for each source=95,118,1
Table 4-6. Emission Factors of Benzene in each facility=97,120,1
Table 4-7. EPA AP-42 Emision Factors of Benzene=98,121,1
Table 4-8. Emission Factors of Aldehyde in each facility=99,122,1
Table 4-9. EPA AP-42 Emission factors of Formaldehyde=100,123,1
Table 4-10. EPA AP-42 Emission Factors of Acetaldehyde=100,123,1
Table 4-11. Emission Factors of Fluoric Compounds in each facility=101,124,1
Table 4-12. EPA AP-42 Emission Factors of Fluoric Compounds(HF)=102,125,1
Table 4-13. Emission Factors of HYdrochloric Acid in each facility=103,126,1
Table 4-14. EPA AP-42 Emission Factors of Hydrochloric Acid=104,127,1
Table 4-15. Current state of municipal waste incineration in Korea=106,129,1
Table 4-16. current state of industrial waste incineration in Korea=107,130,1
Table 4-17. Estimated emissions emitted from Waste Incinerator in Korea=109,132,1
Fig.2-1. Comparision of ambient heavy-metal mean conc. in each measurement site (2001~2003)=19,42,1
Fig.2-2. Annual trends of ambient heavy-metasl(Cd,Cr,Ni,Pb) mean conc. in each measurement site (2001~2003)=21,44,1
Fig.2-3. Annual trends of HCL mean conc. in each measurement site (2001~2003)=22,45,1
Fig.2-4. Annual trends of HCN mean conc. in each measurement site (2001~2003)=22,45,1
Fig.2-5. Annual trends of Benzene,Toluene,o-xylene,m/p-xylene mean conc. in each measurement site (2001~2003)=24,47,1
Fig.2-6. VOC emission rate in each sources=51,74,1
Fig.2-7. VOC emission rate by SCC (2001,CAPSS)=53,76,1
Fig.2-8. VOC emission rate in each Provinces (2001,CAPSS)=54,77,1
Fig.2-9. Status of HAP measuring=56,79,1
Fig.3-1. The location of selected facilities=68,91,1
Fig.3-2. Schematics of Paints Manufacturing Process=70,93,1
Fig.3-3. Schematics of Printing Process=71,94,1
Fig.3-4. Schematics of Leather Manufacturing Process=73,96,1
Fig.3-5. Schematics of Synthetic Leather Resin Manufacturing Process=74,97,1
Fig.3-6. Schematics of Phenol Resin Manufacturing Process=75,98,1
Fig.3-7. Schematics of MDF Manufacturing Process=76,99,1
Fig.3-8. Schematics of Textile Dyeing Process=77,100,1
Fig.3-9. Schematics of Glass Manufacturing Process for TV Braun-tube=79,102,1
Fig.3-10. A photograph of Sampling at facilities=86,109,1
Fig.4-1. Benzene conc. in each facility=89,112,1
Fig.4-2. Acetaldehyde conc. in each facility=91,114,1
Fig.4-3. Formaldehyde conc. in each facility=91,114,1
Fig.4-4. fluoric Compounds conc. in each facility=93,116,1
Fig.4-5. Hydrochloric Acid conc. in each facility=94,117,1
Fig.4-6. The ratio of incinerated municipal waste in each city(2001)=105,128,1
Fig.4-7. The ratio of incinerated industrial waste in each city(2000)=107,130,1
Fig.4-8. Estimated emission emitted from Waste Incinerator in Korea=110,133,1
Fig.5-1. Schematic flow diagram for intergrated HAP management=114,137,1