ForewordExecutive SummaryImplementation of the minimum standard: Aggregate data and key figuresKey role of the MLIPlans for the implementation of the minimum standard and support provided to jurisdictionsRecommendationsDifficulties in implementing the minimum standardConclusion and next stepsBackground on the Action 6 minimum standard and peer reviewJURISDICTIONAL SECTIONSInclusive Framework members on 31 May 2021AlbaniaAndorraAngolaAnguillaAntigua and BarbudaArgentinaArmeniaArubaAustraliaAustriaThe BahamasBahrainBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBeninBermudaBosnia-HerzegovinaBotswanaBrazilBritish Virgin IslandsBrunei DarussalamBulgariaBurkina FasoCabo VerdeCameroonCanadaCayman IslandsChileChina (People’s Republic of)ColombiaCongoCook IslandsCosta RicaCôte d’IvoireCroatiaCuraçaoCzech RepublicDemocratic Republic of the CongoDenmarkDjiboutiDominicaDominican RepublicEgyptEstoniaEswatiniFaroe IslandsFinlandFranceGabonGeorgiaGermanyGibraltarGreeceGreenlandGrenadaGuernseyHaitiHondurasHong Kong (China)HungaryIcelandIndiaIndonesiaIrelandIsle of ManIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJerseyJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaLatviaLiberiaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMacau (China)MalaysiaMaldivesMaltaMauritiusMexicoMonacoMongoliaMontenegroMontserratMoroccoNamibiaNetherlandsNew ZealandNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorwayOmanPakistanPanamaPapua New GuineaParaguayPeruPolandPortugalQatarRomaniaRussian FederationSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSamoaSan MarinoSaudi ArabiaSenegalSerbiaSeychellesSierra LeoneSingaporeSlovak RepublicSloveniaSouth AfricaSpainSri LankaSwedenSwitzerlandThailandTrinidad and TobagoTunisiaTurkeyTurks and Caicos IslandsUkraineUnited Arab EmiratesUnited KingdomUnited StatesUruguayViet NamZambia