Title page
Contents
Why this study? 2
Research questions 4
Findings 6
Implications 14
References 15
Table 1. The Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool standards showed varying levels of validity and reliability 13
Figure 1. Cooperating teachers found most Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool standards to be representative, usable, and feasible 6
Figure 2. The majority of the Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool standards were mostly aligned to existing standards 8
Figure 3. Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool scores provided by cooperating teachers and supervising faculty were positively related 9
Figure 4. Cooperating teachers' Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool scores showed stronger relationships with Praxis Principles of Learning and Teaching scores than with Kansas... 10
Figure 5. Supervising faculty's Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool scores related to both Praxis Principles of Learning and Teaching scores and Kansas Performance Teaching Portfolio... 11
Figure 6. Overall and standard-level Kansas Clinical Assessment Tool scores demonstrated internal consistency (reliability) 12
Boxes
Box 1. Key terms 3
Box 2. Data sources, sample, and methods 5