권호기사보기
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
대표형(전거형, Authority) | 생물정보 | 이형(異形, Variant) | 소속 | 직위 | 직업 | 활동분야 | 주기 | 서지 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
연구/단체명을 입력해주세요. |
|
|
|
|
|
* 주제를 선택하시면 검색 상세로 이동합니다.
Title page
Contents
List of abbreviations 3
Executive summary 4
Introduction - Forecasting the far-right surge 6
1. Gloomy prospects 6
1.1. RADICALS MARCH ON IN THE MEMBER STATES 6
1.2. EP ELECTIONS BODE WELL FOR RADICALS 7
1.3. THE REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY CRISIS SUSTAINS THE POPULIST FAR-RIGHT 8
2. But the devil is in the details 9
2.1. MUCH BARK BUT LITTLE BITE 9
2.1.1. Weak direct policy influence 10
2.1.2. Strong pull for the mainstream 14
2.2. SIMULATION EXPERIMENT FOR THE FAR-RIGHT'S POLICY IMPACT 15
3. A brave new world 17
Annex I: Description of the dataset 18
Annex II: Cohesion metrics 20
Annex III: Further notes on the simulations 20
Annex IV: Impacted sessions by policy area 22
Annex V: Likely failed procedures 23
Table 1. The number of voting sessions related to each policy area 19
Table 2. The average number and percentage of affected voting sessions by policy area 22
Table 3. Procedures that would have failed with greater than 50% probability 23
Figure 1. THE INFLUENCE OF POLITICAL GROUPS AS MEASURED BY AVERAGE SUCCESS RATE 10
Figure 2. THE INTERNAL COHESION OF POLITICAL GROUPS 11
Figure 3. THE COHESION OF HYPOTHETICAL COALITIONS 12
Figure 4. THE COHESION OF RADICAL RIGHT-WING MEPS IN THE MOST RELEVANT POLICY AREAS 13
Figure 5. THE NUMBER OF WRITTEN QUESTIONS TO THE COMMISSION BY POLITICAL GROUP 14
Figure 6. THE NUMBER OF AMENDMENTS SPONSORED BY POLITICAL GROUPS 14
Figure 7. THE SEAT PROJECTION USED IN SIMULATIONS 15
Figure 8. THE DISTRIBUTION OF VOTING SESSION BY PROCEDURE TYPE 18
Figure 9. THE EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE NUMBER OF SESSIONS WITH A DIFFERENT-THAN-ORIGINAL OUTCOME 21
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
*전화번호 | ※ '-' 없이 휴대폰번호를 입력하세요 |
---|
기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
---|
번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.