권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Contents
Locating feminism beyond gender and culture : a case of the family-head system in South Korea / Hee-Kang Kim 1
〈국문요약〉 1
1. Introduction 2
2. Posing a Dilemma : Gender vs. Culture 5
3. The Debate over the Family-head System : An Overview 11
4. Feminist Logic and Rhetoric : An Analysis 18
1) The Post-colonial Construction of Culture 18
2) The Post-Confucian Interpretation of Gender Equality 24
3) The Nationalist Challenge to Neo-colonialism 28
5. Conclusion : Locating South Korean Feminism 33
Literature 35
-Abstract- 45
최근의 영미 페미니즘 학계에서는 양분법적인 이해에 근거해 젠더와 문화의 관계를 서로 양립할 수 없는 딜레마로 해석한다. 이 연구는 한국의 호주제를 사례로 하여 영미학계의 젠더-문화의 관계에 관한 상호배타적인 해석을 비판한다. 언뜻 보기에 호주제의 존폐를 둘러싼 여성계와 유림계간의 논쟁은 젠더-문화의 딜레마와 닮은 듯해 보인다. 그러나 호주제 논쟁이 구체적인 역사, 사회적 맥락에서 분석된다면 젠더와 문화의 관계는 단순히 대립적이거나 상반되지 않는다. 특히 한국의 가족법 개정운동과 그 속에서 발전된 여성계의 논리와 수사가 탈식민지적, 탈유교주의적, 그리고 신식민지적 맥락에서 고려되었을 때 성평등과 문화보존의 문제는 서로 양립될 수 있는 가능성을 내포한다.
On February 3, 2005, the Constitutional Court in South Korea ruled that the family-head (hoju) system was incompatible with the Constitution. South Korean feminists had criticized the family-head system, arguing that it represented a typical patriarchy under which women were discriminated against in family relationships. In contrast, the advocates of traditional Korean culture-the "Confucians"-had contended that the family-head system was a Korean cultural practice and that custom should be preserved regardles of its patriarchal nature. This controversy between the feminists and the Confucians in the case of the family-head system is rooted in a gender-culture dilema, one to which current feminist scholarship has paid special attention. In this paper, however, I will argue that the binary understanding of gender and culture, which is a source of the dilema, inadequately accounts for the case of the family-head system. By analyzing the feminist family-law reform movement and by centering on the feminist logic and the feminist rhetoric developed in the movement, I will show how the relationship betwen gender and culture is not simply opositional. I will argue that any rigorous comprehensive analysis of the case must account for the case's contextual mechanisms. Only in this way can we find compatibility between the demand for gender equality and the quest for cultural
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 목차 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 'Sensu cosmopolitico' 속의 동북아시아공동체 :근대기획과 탈근대적 성찰의 문제 | 최치원 | pp.5-32 |
|
보기 |
| 정보사회담론에 대한 외부로부터의 고찰 :정보사회담론의 이데올로기적 지형 | 권기욱 | pp.33-65 |
|
보기 |
| 조선후기 순천 재지사족의 향촌지배 실태와 동향 :향교 소장 문서 분석을 중심으로 | 박진철 | pp.67-99 |
|
보기 |
| 동북아 NGO 네트워크의 유형과 발전의제 | 최대석 ;김석향 | pp.101-131 |
|
보기 |
| 사회적 과시의 재생산 메커니즘과 광고 | 우실하 | pp.133-175 |
|
보기 |
| 현대인들의 과시 :자아 정체성의 (재)생산 | 정성원 | pp.177-205 |
|
보기 |
| 한국사회 저출산의 단계별 분석과 젠더논의 | 손승영 | pp.207-243 |
|
보기 |
| Locating feminism beyond gender and culture :a case of the family-head system in South Korea | Hee-kang Kim | pp.245-290 |
|
보기 |
| Kant on China and confucius | Eun-jeung Lee | pp.291-314 |
|
보기 |
| 번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Benhabib, Seyla, (2002) The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era, Princeton: Princeton University Press | 미소장 |
| 2 | Chatterjee, (1986) University of Minnesota Press, | 미소장 |
| 3 | Chen, Martha, (1995) A Matter of Survival: Women’s Right to Employment in India and Bangladesh, Oxford: Clarendon Press | 미소장 |
| 4 | Cho, Erin, (1998) Caught in Confucius’ Shadow: The Struggle for Women’s Legal Equality in South Korea, | 미소장 |
| 5 | Chun, Ji-won, (2005) Feminist-Confucian Responses, | 미소장 |
| 6 | Chung, Ah-young, (2005) Current Family Registry System Incompatible with the Constitution, | 미소장 |
| 7 | Choi, Chungmoo, (1998) Nationalism and Construction of Gender in Korea, New York and London: Routledge | 미소장 |
| 8 | Code, Lorraine, (2000) How to Think Globally: Stretching the Limits of Imagination, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 9 | Martina, (1992) The Confucian Transformation of Korea A Study of Society and Ideology, Harvard University Press | 미소장 |
| 10 | Deveaux, Monique, (2000) Conflicting Equalities? Cultural Group Rights and Sex Equality, | 미소장 |
| 11 | Paul, (1987) ″Notes on Relativism ″ In his Farewell to Reason, | 미소장 |
| 12 | Gilliam, (1991) ″ In Chandra Talpade Mohanty Third WorldWomen and the Politics of eminism, Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 13 | Gilman, Sander L, (1999) Barbaric’ Rituals?, Princeton: Princeton University Press | 미소장 |
| 14 | Grewal, (1994) ″ In Inderpal Grewal and Caren Kaplan University of Minnesota Press, | 미소장 |
| 15 | Haboush, (1991) ″The Confucianization of Korean Society, Princeton Princeton University Press | 미소장 |
| 16 | Hahm, Chaibong, (2003a) Family versus the Individual: The Politics of Marriage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 17 | Hahm, Chaihark, (2003b) Law, Culture, and the Politics of Confucianism, | 미소장 |
| 18 | Herr, Ranjoo Seodu, (2003) The Possibility of Nationalist Feminism, | 미소장 |
| 19 | Herr, Ranjoo Seodu, (2004) A Third World Feminist Defense of Multiculturalism, | 미소장 |
| 20 | Eric, (1992) The Invention of Tradition, Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 21 | Jaggar, Alison M, (2000) Globalizing Feminist Ethics, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 22 | London, (1986) Feminism and Nationalism in the Third World, Zed Books Ltd | 미소장 |
| 23 | ″Common Themes, (1991) ″ In Chandra Talpade Mohanty Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 24 | Kang, Man’gil, (1995) Contemporary nationalist movements and the minjung, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press | 미소장 |
| 25 | Kim, Elaine H, (1998) Introduction, Routledge: New York and London | 미소장 |
| 26 | Kim, Kwang-ok, (1996) The Reproduction of Confucian Culture in Contemporary Korea, Cambridge: Harvard University Press | 미소장 |
| 27 | Kim, Kyung-hee, (2004) The Debate on the Abolition of the Family-Head System and Anticipation, | 미소장 |
| 28 | Koh, Byong-ik, (1996) Confucianism in Contemporary Korea, Cambridge: Harvard University Press | 미소장 |
| 29 | Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations, (2005) An Easy Introduction of the Abolishment of the Family System [A Pamphlet], Seoul: Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations Press [Korea] | 미소장 |
| 30 | Lee, Seongwoo, (2004a) Feminism in Korean Family Law, | 미소장 |
| 31 | Lee, (1992) The 37 Year Movement to Revise Korea’s Family Law Korea Legal Aid Center for Family Relations Press [Korean], | 미소장 |
| 32 | Lee, WhaSook, (2004b) The Head of Family System, It’s Patriarchal Thought and Discriminational Factors, | 미소장 |
| 33 | Louie, Miriam Ching Yoon, (1995) Mingjung Feminism: Korean Women’s Movement for Gender and Class Liberation, | 미소장 |
| 34 | McBeth, (1987) ″A Family Feud for Confucians and Women, | 미소장 |
| 35 | Chandra Talpade, (1991) ″Cartographies of Struggle Third WorldWomen and the Politics of Feminism ″ In Chandra Talpade Mohanty Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism, Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 36 | Chandra Talpade, (1992) Locating the Politics of Experience ″ In Michele Barrett and Anne Phillips, Stanford University Press | 미소장 |
| 37 | Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, (2003) Feminism without Borders: Decolonizing Theory, Practicing Solidarity, Durham & London: Duke University Press | 미소장 |
| 38 | Moon, Seungsook, (1998) Begetting the Nation: The Androcentric Discourse of National History and Tradition in Sough Korea, New York and London: Routledge | 미소장 |
| 39 | Moon, Seungsook, (2002) Carving Out Space: Civil Society and the Women’s Movement in South Korea, | 미소장 |
| 40 | Narayan, Uma, (1997) Dislocating Cultures: Identities, Traditions, and Third World Feminism, New York and London: Routledge | 미소장 |
| 41 | Narayan, Uma, (2000a) Essence of Culture and a Sense of History: A Feminist Critique of Cultural Essentialism, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 42 | Narayan, Uma, (2000b) Undoing the ‘Package Picture’ of Cultures, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press | 미소장 |
| 43 | Nussbaum, Martha, (1995) Human Capabilties, Female Human Beings, Oxford: Clarendon Press | 미소장 |
| 44 | Nussbaum, Martha, (1999) Sex and Social Justice, New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press | 미소장 |
| 45 | Nussbaum, Martha, (2000) Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 46 | Okin, Susan, (1995) Inequalities Between the Sexes in Different CulturalContexts, Oxford: Clarendon Press | 미소장 |
| 47 | Okin, Susan, (1998) Feminism and Multiculturalism: Some Tensions, | 미소장 |
| 48 | Okin, Susan, (1999) Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?, Princeton: Princeton University Press | 미소장 |
| 49 | Okin, Susan, (2000) Feminism, Women’s Human Rights, and Cultural Differences, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 50 | Okin, Susan, (2005) Multiculturalism and Feminism: No Simple Question, No Simple Answers, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 51 | Park, Chai Bin, (1995) Consequences of Son Preference in a Low-Fertility Society: Imbalance of the Sex-Ratio at Birth in Korea, | 미소장 |
| 52 | Hanna, (1990) ″ In Irene Tinker, Oxford University Press | 미소장 |
| 53 | Phillips, Anne, (2005) Dilemmas of Gender and Culture: The Judge, theDemocrat and the Political Activist, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 54 | Putman, Ruth Anna, (1995) Why Not a Feminist Theory of Justice?, Oxford: Clarendon Press | 미소장 |
| 55 | Robinson, (1991) ″Perceptions of Confucianism in Twentieth-Century Korea ″ In Gilbert Rozman, Princeton Princeton University Press | 미소장 |
| 56 | Rudy, Kathy, (2000) Difference and Indifference: A U.S. Feminist Response to Global Politics, Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press | 미소장 |
| 57 | Schutte, Ofelia, (2000) Cultural Alterity: Cross-Cultural Communication and Feminist Theory in North-South Contexts, Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press | 미소장 |
| 58 | Shachar, Ayelet, (2001) Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press | 미소장 |
| 59 | Song, Sang Hyun, (1996) Special Problems in Studying Korean Law, Seoul: Pakyongsa Publication | 미소장 |
| 60 | Tu, (1991) ″The Search for Roots in industrial East Asia The Case of the Confucian Revival ″ In Martin Marty and R, Chicago University Press | 미소장 |
| 61 | Yang, Hyunah, (1998) Re-membering the Korean Military Comfort Women: Nationalism, Sexuality, and Silencing, New York and London: Routledge | 미소장 |
| 62 | Yang, Hyunah, (2002a) Unfinished Tasks for Korean Family Policy in the 1990s: Maternity Protection Policy and Abolition of the Family-Head System, | 미소장 |
| 63 | Yang, Hyunah, (2002b) Questions of ‘Tradition’ and ‘Women’: Cultural Analysis of the Lawsuit about Unconstitutionality of the Family-Head(Hoju) System, | 미소장 |
| 64 | Yang, Hyunah, (2002c) A Study of the Lawsuit about Unconstitutionality of the Family-Head(Hoju) System from the View of Sociology of Law: Changes of ‘the Families, | 미소장 |
| 65 | Yang, Hyunah, (2003) Gender Equality vs. ‘Tradition’ in Korean Family Law: Toward a Postcolonial Feminist Jurisprudence, | 미소장 |
| 66 | Wedeen, Lisa, (2002) Conceptualizing Culture: Possibilities for Political Science, | 미소장 |
| 67 | Wells, Kenneth, (1995) Introduction, Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press | 미소장 |
| 68 | WuDunn, Sheryl, (1997) Korean Women Still Feel Demands to Bear a Son, | 미소장 |
| 69 | Yoon, Bang-Soon, (2001) Democratization and Gender Politics in South Korea, Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield | 미소장 |
| 70 | Spinner-Halev, Jeff, (2001) Feminism, Multiculturalism, Oppression, and the State, | 미소장 |
| 71 | Yu, Il-kyung, (2003) The Logic of Abolishment of the Family-Head System, | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: 정기간행물실(524호) / 서가번호: 국내03
2021년 이전 정기간행물은 온라인 신청(원문 구축 자료는 원문 이용)
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.