본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기
국회도서관 홈으로 정보검색 소장정보 검색

목차보기

표제지

목차

I. 서론 8

II. 이론적 배경 12

제1절 공적연금제도 12

1) 공적연금의 유형 13

2) 자격관리 17

3) 비용부담방식 19

4) 재정운용방식 21

5) 급여 23

제2절 공적연금제도에 영향을 미치는 요인 27

1) 경제체제가 연금제도에 대한 영향 27

2) 이해집단이 연금제도에 대한 영향 31

3) 인구노령화가 연금제도에 대한 영향 33

제3절 분석과제 34

1) 자격관리 35

2) 비용부담방식 35

3) 재정운용방식 36

4) 급여 37

III. 연구방법 38

제1절 연구대상 38

제2절 연구자료 및 제한점 38

제3절 분석방법 40

IV. 연구분석 41

제1절 한국의 국민연금제도와 중국의 양로보험제도의 발전과정에 대한 소개 41

1) 한국의 국민연금제도 발전에 대한 소개 41

2) 중국의 양로보험제도 발전에 대한 분석 51

제2절 한국의 국민연금과 중국의 양로보험제도에 영향을 미치는 경제체제, 이해집단, 인구노령화요인에 대한 소개 70

1) 경제체제 70

2) 이해집단 71

3) 인구노령화 72

제3절 현행 한국 국민연금제도와 중국 양로보험제도의 비교분석 - 체제, 이해집단, 인구노령화요인으로부터 74

1) 자격관리 74

2) 비용부담방식 81

3) 재정운용방식 92

4) 급여 97

V. 연구 결과 및 제언 106

제1절 연구 결과 요약 106

제2절 제언 113

참고문헌 115

ABSTRACT 122

그림목차

〈그림1〉 기본연금액의 산정식 98

〈그림2〉 소득계층별 소득대체율 (%) 99

초록보기

This thesis analyses comparatively the public pension system of Korea and the enterprise endowment insurance system of China; seeks, in details, the common and different factors of the two systems; and attempts to find the influence of economic systems, interest groups, and aging of population. It is for the purpose of providing accurate and in-depth understanding and guidelines for future improvements of the Korean public pension system and the Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system.

In this study we analyse the common and different factors of the Korean public pension system and the Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system in terms of four aspects: eligibility, method of payment, method of fund operation, benefit. In addition, we investigate how these common and different factors are affected by economic systems, interest groups, and aging of population.

What we have found are as follows:

1. From the viewpoint of eligibility management, the Korean public pension system and the Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system are similar as both of them have been developed and expanded on the basis of laborers in factories. This common factor has been mainly affected by economic systems and interest groups, but has been presumed not to be affected by aging of population.

2. From the viewpoint of payment method, the base amount of Korean public pension system is relatively too low, while the corporate burden of Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system is too high. This difference is influenced by all of economic systems, interest groups, and aging of population.

3. From the viewpoint of fund operation, both the Korean public pension system and the Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system adopt the partial funded system in common. This commonality is highly affected by all of the three factors of economic systems, interest groups, and aging of population.

4. From the viewpoint of benefit, both of the Korean public pension system and the Chinese enterprise endowment insurance system similar in that both systems adopt a combination of flat-rate benefits and earnings-related benefits. This similarity are influenced by economic systems, interest groups, and aging of population.