권호기사보기
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
결과 내 검색
동의어 포함
Title Page
Contents
List of Abbreviations 17
Abstract 19
Chapter 1. Introduction 21
1.1. Problem Statement 21
1.1.1. Optimal Placement and Sizing of Multiple Distributed Generations 21
1.1.2. Islanding Detection Method for Multiple DGs 22
1.1.3. Inverter Controller 22
1.1.4. Power Management for Multiple DGs 23
1.1.5. Load Modeling 23
1.2. Objective of Research 24
1.3. Dissertation Outlines 25
1.4. Research Publications 27
Chapter 2. Optimal Placement and Sizing of Multiple Distributed Generations 28
2.1. Introduction 28
2.2. Optimal Placement of Multiple DGs 30
2.2.1. Reduction of Power Loss by Connecting DG 30
2.2.2. Selection of Optimal Location in Transmission Network 36
2.2.3. Selection of Optimal Location in Distribution Network 39
2.3. Optimal Sizing by Using Kalman Filter Algorithm 42
2.3.1. Estimation by Using Kalman Filter Algorithm 42
2.3.2. Finding Actual Values 47
2.3.3. Evaluation of Estimation Performance 48
2.3.4. Selection of Optimal Sizes in Real Distribution System 50
2.4. Optimal Sizing by Using LMM and RMP 52
2.4.1. Description of Power Loss by Using Reduced Multivariate Polynomial 52
2.4.2. Description of Sizes of DGs by Using Lagrange Multiplier Method 53
2.4.3. Sampling Procedure with Consideration of Segment Dividing 56
2.4.4. Estimation of Sizes of DGs by Using RMP 58
Chapter 3. Islanding Detection Method for Multiple DGs 60
3.1. Introduction 60
3.2. Islanding Detection Method without Non-Detection Zone 62
3.2.1. Non-Detection Zone(NDZ) by OUV/OUF Method 62
3.2.2. Description of Distribution Network 63
3.2.3. Grid-Connected Single DG System 65
3.2.4. Grid-Connected Multiple DG Systems 69
3.2.5. Implementation of Islanding Detection Method 69
3.3. Case Studies in Single DG System 71
3.3.1. Similar Load Consumption and DG Output 71
3.3.2. Different Load Consumption and DG Output 72
3.3.3. Consideration of Signal to Noise Ratio 73
3.4. Case Studies in Multiple DG Systems 74
3.4.1. Similar Load Consumptions and DG Outputs 75
3.4.2. Different Load Consumptions and DG Outputs 75
3.4.3. Connection of another DG System with Different Switching Frequency 77
3.4.4. Connection of another DG System with Same Switching Frequency 77
3.4.5. Connection of another Load 78
3.4.6. Connection of Nonlinear Sensitive Load 79
3.4.7. Short-Circuit Fault Clearance 81
Chapter 4. Inverter Controller 82
4.1. Introduction 82
4.2. Islanding Detection Methods 84
4.2.1. Distributed Generation System 84
4.2.2. Inverter's Switching Frequency Based IDM 85
4.2.3. P-V Characteristics of Load Based IDM 85
4.3. Design of Novel Inverter Controller 88
4.3.1. Conventional Inverter Controller 88
4.3.2. Design of Novel Inverter Controller 92
4.4. Case Studies for Inverter Control 95
4.4.1. Different θref(이미지참조) 95
4.4.2. Start of Inverter 96
4.4.3. Changed Pref and Zero Qref(이미지참조) 97
4.4.4. Changed Pref and Non-Zero Qref(이미지참조) 98
4.5. Case Studies for Islanding Detection 99
4.5.1. Different Load Consumption and DG Output 99
4.5.2. Same Load Consumption and DG Output 101
4.5.3. Weak Grid 101
4.5.4. Application of SFIDM 102
Chapter 5. Power Management for Multiple DGs Based on Renewable Energies 104
5.1. Introduction 104
5.2. The Proposed Power Management Method 106
5.2.1. DG System with BESS 106
5.2.2. Amount of Available Power Management in Feeder 107
5.2.3. Power Management in Islanded Feeder 109
5.2.4. Grid-Connection of Islanded Feeder 113
5.3. Inverter Control of DG Systems 115
5.3.1. Control of Utility-Owned DG for Grid-Connected Operation 115
5.3.2. Control of Utility-Owned DG for Islanding Operation 116
5.3.3. Control of Utility-Owned DG to Synchronize Feeder with Grid 118
5.4. Case Studies 119
5.4.1. Case-1: When Total Output Power from DGs is Larger Than Total Load Consumptions 119
5.4.2. Case-2: When Total Output Power from DGs is Smaller Than Total Load Consumptions 121
5.4.3. Case-3: Grid-Connection 124
Chapter 6. Load Modeling 126
6.1. Introduction 126
6.2. Load Data Acquisition for Static Model 128
6.2.1. Data Acquisition from K-EMS 128
6.2.2. Data Classification and Valid Data Screening 129
6.3. K-EMS Real Data Based Load Modeling 131
6.3.1. Selection of Load Model Structure 131
6.3.2. Kalman Filter Based ZIP Model Parameter Estimation Algorithm 132
6.3.3. Algorithm Verification Using PSS/E Data 135
6.3.4. Results of Load Modeling Based on Real K-EMS Data 137
6.4. DFR Real Data Based Load Modeling 141
6.4.1. Selection of Load Model Structure 141
6.4.2. Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm 143
6.4.3. Results of Dynamic Load Modeling Based on Real DFR Data 144
Chapter 7. Conclusions 146
References 150
Fig. 2.1. IEEE benchmarked 31-bus system. 31
Fig. 2.2. Power flow from the κ-th generator to the several loads. 32
Fig. 2.3. Power flow from the several generators to the l-th load. 32
Fig. 2.4. Simplified circuit with only power generations and consumptions. 33
Fig. 2.5. Simplified unit circuit between two buses. 33
Fig. 2.6. Power losses corresponding to the variations in size of DG. 36
Fig. 2.7. The power loss sensitivities of related buses. 37
Fig. 2.8. The power-margins, PM of related buses.(이미지참조) 38
Fig. 2.9. The OLIs of related buses. 38
Fig. 2.10. A part of Do-gok distribution network in Seoul, Korea. 40
Fig. 2.11. The OLIs of related buses in three Areas. 41
Fig. 2.12. Comparison of power losses according to different locations of multiple DGs. 41
Fig. 2.13. Procedure to obtain data samples of the multiple DGs and power loss required before applying the Kalman filter algorithm. 44
Fig. 2.14. Steps to estimate the optimal size of multiple DGs in two phases by applying the Kalman filter algorithm. 45
Fig. 2.15. Convergence of states for estimation of multiple DGs' size. 47
Fig. 2.16. Convergence of states for estimation of total power loss. 48
Fig. 2.17. Estimation performance of the Kalman filter algorithm for each DG. 49
Fig. 2.18. Estimation performance of total power loss. 50
Fig. 2.19. Estimation results for optimal sizes of three DGs. 51
Fig. 2.20. Procedure to obtain data samples of the multiple DGs and power losses with consideration of segment dividing. 57
Fig. 2.21. Estimation performances of the first-order RMP and the fourth-order Kalman-filter algorithms. 58
Fig. 3.1. Non-detection zone (NDZ) by the OUV/OUF based method. 63
Fig. 3.2. Distribution power network interconnected with multiple DG systems. 64
Fig. 3.3. Simplified distribution network with single DG system. 65
Fig. 3.4. Modeling of distribution network with the estimated impedances. 66
Fig. 3.5. Variation of impedance, Zsw corresponding to mf.(이미지참조) 68
Fig. 3.6. Implementation of the proposed islanding detection algorithm based on the orthogonal characteristic of high frequency components. 70
Fig. 3.7. Responses of a-phase voltage at the terminal of DG-1 after the islanding operation at 0.5 s: (a) Magnitude (b) Phase. 71
Fig. 3.8. Voltage response at high switching frequency (15 kHz) of PWM inverter in the islanding and pre-islanding operations. 72
Fig. 3.9. Responses of α-phase voltage at the terminal of DG-1 after the islanding operation at 0.5 s: (a) Magnitude (b) Phase. 73
Fig. 3.10. Voltage response at high switching frequency (15 kHz) of PWM inverter in the islanding and pre-islanding operations. 73
Fig. 3.11. Responses in the case study-3.4.1. 76
Fig. 3.12. Responses in the case study-3.4.2. 76
Fig. 3.13. Responses in the case study-3.4.3. 77
Fig. 3.14. Responses in the case study-3.4.4. 78
Fig. 3.15. Responses in the case study-3.4.5. 79
Fig. 3.16. Responses in the case study-3.4.6. 80
Fig. 3.17. Responses in the case study-3.4.7. 81
Fig. 4.1. Practical Do-gok distribution power network in a part of Seoul, Korea. 84
Fig. 4.2. Islanding detection performances of the SFIDM and the OUV/OUF IDM. 86
Fig. 4.3. The P-V characteristics corresponding to the curves of Pinv and PLoad.(이미지참조) 86
Fig. 4.4. Phasor diagram to describe the Park's transformation. 89
Fig. 4.5. Block diagram of phase-locked loop (PLL). 89
Fig. 4.6. Phasor diagram to describe the Park's transformation when PLL is not ideal. 90
Fig. 4.7. Block diagram of conventional inverter controller. 91
Fig. 4.8. Block diagram of proposed inverter controller by using magnitude and phase angle of voltage. 93
Fig. 4.9. Phasor diagram to describe the operation of phase-shifter in the proposed controller. 93
Fig. 4.10. Phasor diagram to describe the relationship among the Vfilter, the Vs, and the V.(이미지참조) 94
Fig. 4.11. Performances of proposed controller corresponding to the synchronized and zero θref.(이미지참조) 96
Fig. 4.12. Comparison of conventional and proposed controllers in starting response performance. 97
Fig. 4.13. Comparison of two controllers' performances when the Pref is changed and the Qref is zero.(이미지참조) 98
Fig. 4.14. Comparison of two controllers' performances when the Pref is changed and the Qref is 0.31 pu.(이미지참조) 99
Fig. 4.15. Comparison of islanding detection performances with the OUV IDM when the amount of load consumption and the DG output power are different. 100
Fig. 4.16. Comparison of islanding detection performances with the PVIDM when the amount of load consumption and the DG output power are same. 101
Fig. 4.17. Performances of the conventional and proposed controllers when the grid impedance is increased. 102
Fig. 4.18. Comparison of islanding detection performances with the SFIDM. 103
Fig. 5.1. Distributed generation and battery energy storage systems. 106
Fig. 5.2. Electrical circuit model of battery in BESS. 107
Fig. 5.3. Distributed generations connected to a part of practical distribution network at Do-gok area in Seoul, Korea. 108
Fig. 5.4. Power management algorithm for the only DGu,1.(이미지참조) 112
Fig. 5.5. Protection algorithm for DGu,1 and DGu,2(이미지참조) 112
Fig. 5.6. Grid-connection algorithm for DGu,1 and DGu,2(이미지참조) 114
Fig. 5.7. Block diagram of inverter controller using magnitude and phase of voltage. 115
Fig. 5.8. Phasor diagram to describe the output power of inverter. 116
Fig. 5.9. Block diagram of voltage magnitude-controller (M-Ci) and phase-controller (P-Ci) for utility-owned DG during the islanding operation.(이미지참조) 117
Fig. 5.10. Block diagram of voltage magnitude-controller (M-Cs) and phase-controller (P-Cs) to synchronize the feeder and grid voltages. 118
Fig. 5.11. Powers generated from DGs before and after islanding (Case-1). 120
Fig. 5.12. Other results (Case-1): (a) reactive powers of DGs, (b) voltages of DGs, (c) states of circuit breakers, and (d) frequency of utility-owned DGs. 121
Fig. 5.13. Powers generated from DGs before and after islanding (Case-2). 123
Fig. 5.14. Other results (Case-2): (a) reactive powers of DGs, (b) voltages of DGs, (c) states of circuit breakers, and (d) frequency of utility-owned DGs. 123
Fig. 5.15. Results for Case-3: (a) powers from the utility-owned DGs, (b) states of circuit breakers, (c) synchronization of α-phase voltage at Brk2, (d) synchronization of α-phase voltage at Brk6, (e) α-phase current from DGu,1, and (f) α-phase current from DGu,2.(이미지참조) 125
Fig. 6.1. K-EMS data acquisition process 129
Fig. 6.2. K-EMS raw data classification 130
Fig. 6.3. Data screening process 130
Fig. 6.4. Estimation algorithm to determine parameters of ZIP model 134
Fig. 6.5. Estimation results using noise-free PSS/E data 135
Fig. 6.6. Estimation results using noise-included PSS/E data 136
Fig. 6.7. Characteristics of measured load and load model at substation-A (without tap change)-10:02:32 a.m., February 8, 2011 (pz=0.3851, pI=0.3362, pp=0.2787, qz=3.2397, qI=-0.1611, qQ=-2.0786).(이미지참조) 137
Fig. 6.8. Validation of load model which is represented in Fig. 6.7. with anther data achieved from substation-A - 10:35:20 a.m., February 9, 2011 138
Fig. 6.9. Characteristics of measured load and load model at substation-A (with tap change) - 10:27:00 a.m., February 8, 2011 (pz=0.6245, pI=-0.3000, pp=0.6755, qz=5.4470, qI=-5.4659, qQ=1.0189).(이미지참조) 139
Fig. 6.10. Characteristics of measured load and load model at substation-B - 06:07:00 a.m., February 9, 2011 140
Fig. 6.11. Characteristics of measured load and load model at substation-C - 05:57:44 a.m., February 8, 2011 141
Fig. 6.12. ZIP + IM model 142
Fig. 6.13. Dynamic load modeling by using DFR data at substation-N 144
Fig. 6.14. Static load modeling by using DFR data at substation-N 145
This dissertation presents studies on distributed generation (DG) and its connected power system. The DG changes entire powerflows and the construction of additional transmission lines are determined by the powerflows. At the view point of the power system, therefore, selection of locations of multiple DGs is one of the most important issues. In addition, because the powerflows are affected by the sizes of DGs, selection of sizes of multiple DGs is important as much as the selection of locations. However, selection of locations or sizes of multiple DGs are not simple problem. To solve the powerflows, the entire power systems should be analyzed by numerical method and it requires much time for calculation. Moreover, the calculation time increases exponentially corresponding to the increase of number of DGs. The calculation time to select optimal locations is dramatically reduced by using the sensitivity of power loss and the derivative of the sensitivity. Also, the calculation time to select optimal sizes is reduced by using the Kalman filter algorithm.
The DGs usually supplies electrical power independently from the utility. Therefore, islanding detection should be seriously considered to protect the power system and DG itself. The passive islanding detection method (IDM) does not impact the power system, but it has large non-detection zone (NDZ). In contrast, the active islanding detection method has relatively smaller NDZ or no NDZ. However, the active IDM harms the stability of the power system. To solve the problems of the passive and active IDMs, switching frequency component of inverter is used. The switching frequency based IDM (SFIDM) does not harm the stability of the power system while it detects the islanding operation without the NDZ.
According to the increase of power consumption, peak load demand becomes a serious problem. Because the DG is much smaller than the conventional power plant, it responds quickly to the peak load demand. The response of the DG mainly depends on inverter because most of the DGs are implemented with inverters. In general, the inverter impacts on the stability of power system if it is implemented by focusing on fast response and an active IDM is used. The conventional inverter control algorithm is based on the Park's transformation, and it controls the output power indirectly through currents. The response of inverter is improved without any impact on the stability by developing a method to control the output power directly.
The islanding detection algorithm conventionally stops DG when an islanding is detected. However, the DG can continuously supply power if the DG is controlled directly or indirectly by the utility. The continuous operation of multiple DGs improves the power system reliability by preventing widespread power outage if the DG occupies large ratio of entire power supply. In contrast to the utility owned DG, independent power producer (IPP) owned DG is not controlled by the utility. However, the utility can manage the IPP owned DG with indirect way by using the islanding detection method in each DG. The range of power outage is reduced by the developed management algorithm.
The studies on DG are progressed by assuming that all loads consuming constant power. To extend the studies to real power system, accurate power system model is required. In general, parameters of generator and transmission equipment are given by the manufacturer or achieved by testing procedure. In contrast, it is difficult to get the parameters of loads because it is determined by the consumer. Consequently, the load model is inaccurate comparing to the models of generator and transmission equipment. To reflect the load characteristics accurately, the static load modeling and dynamic load modeling is conducted by using the Kalman filter and Levenberg-Marquardt algorithms, respectively.| 번호 | 참고문헌 | 국회도서관 소장유무 |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reliability modeling of distributed generation in conventional distribution systems planning and analysis ![]() |
미소장 |
| 2 | Improving the voltage profiles of Distribution Networks using multiple Distribution Generation Sources ![]() |
미소장 |
| 3 | “Optimization of embedded generation sizing and siting by using a double trade-off method,” IEE Proceedings of Generation, Transmission and Distribution, Vol. 152, No. 4, pp. 503-513, July 2005. | 미소장 |
| 4 | Optimal Distribution Voltage Control and Coordination With Distributed Generation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 5 | Overview of Anti-Islanding Algorithms for PV Systems. Part I: Passive Methods ![]() |
미소장 |
| 6 | Overview of Anti-Islanding Algorithms for PV Systems. Part II: ActiveMethods ![]() |
미소장 |
| 7 | An islanding detection method for distributed generations using voltage unbalance and total harmonic distortion of current ![]() |
미소장 |
| 8 | New Islanding Detection Method for Inverter-Based Distributed Generation Considering Its Switching Frequency ![]() |
미소장 |
| 9 | A Scalable Power-Line-Signaling-Based Scheme for Islanding Detection of Distributed Generators ![]() |
미소장 |
| 10 | Sandia Frequency-Shift Parameter Selection to Eliminate Nondetection Zones ![]() |
미소장 |
| 11 | A Simple Technique for Islanding Detection With Negligible Nondetection Zone ![]() |
미소장 |
| 12 | Control for Grid-Connected and Intentional Islanding Operations of Distributed Power Generation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 13 | Selection of Optimal Location and Size of Multiple Distributed Generations by Using Kalman Filter Algorithm ![]() |
미소장 |
| 14 | “Selection of Optimal Location and Size of Distributed Generation Considering Power Loss,” The Transactions of KIEE, Vol. 57, No. 4, pp. 551-559, April 2008. | 미소장 |
| 15 | “New Islanding Detection Method for Inverter-Based Distributed Generation Considering Its Switching Frequency,” in proc. of IEEE IAS Annual Meeting 2009, pp. 1-8, Huston, Texas, USA, October 2009. | 미소장 |
| 16 | “An Investigation of Islanding Detection Method by Using High-Frequency Component of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation”, in proc. of KIEE Annual Conference 2008, pp. 1-2, July 2008. | 미소장 |
| 17 | “A Method to Select Optimal Size of Multiple Distributed Generation System by Using the Reduced Multivariate Polynomial Model”, in proc. of KIEE Annual Conference 2009, pp. 56-57, July 2009. | 미소장 |
| 18 | “An Impact Assessment for Active Islanding Detection Method Corresponding to Impedances of Distribution Line”, in proc. of KIEE Annual Conference 2010, pp. 441-442, July 2010. | 미소장 |
| 19 | p,p′-Dichlorodiphenoxydichloroethylene induced apoptosis of Sertoli cells through oxidative stress-mediated p38 MAPK and mitochondrial pathway ![]() |
미소장 |
| 20 | “A Study on Load Modeling of Industrial Area Based on DFR measurements”, in proc. of KIEE Annual Conference 2011, pp. 182-183, July 2011. | 미소장 |
| 21 | IEEE Power and Energy Magazine ![]() |
미소장 |
| 22 | Adequacy assessment of distributed generation systems using Monte Carlo Simulation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 23 | Effect of Load Models in Distributed Generation Planning ![]() |
미소장 |
| 24 | An integrated distributed generation optimization model for distribution system planning ![]() |
미소장 |
| 25 | Analytical approaches for optimal placement of distributed generation sources in power systems ![]() |
미소장 |
| 26 | Optimal distributed generation location using mixed integer non-linear programming in hybrid electricity markets ![]() |
미소장 |
| 27 | “Introduction to Optimal Estimation,” London: Springer Verlag, pp. 149-183, 1999. | 미소장 |
| 28 | Generalized Generation Distribution Factors for Power System Security Evaluations ![]() |
미소장 |
| 29 | Network reconfiguration in distribution systems for loss reduction and load balancing ![]() |
미소장 |
| 30 | Optimum Size and Location of Shunt Capacitors for Reduction of Losses on Distribution Feeders ![]() |
미소장 |
| 31 | Optimal sizing of capacitors placed on a radial distribution system ![]() |
미소장 |
| 32 | DG allocation using an analytical method to minimize losses and to improve voltage security ![]() |
미소장 |
| 33 | A Kalman Filtering Approach to Rapidly Detecting Modal Changes in Power Systems ![]() |
미소장 |
| 34 | “Power System Analysis,” 2nd ed., Singapore: McGraw-Hill, pp. 234-227, 2004. | 미소장 |
| 35 | A Reduced Multivariate-Polynomial Model for Estimation of Electric Load Composition ![]() |
미소장 |
| 36 | Benchmarking a reduced multivariate polynomial pattern classifier. ![]() |
미소장 |
| 37 | Islanding detection of inverter-based distributed generation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 38 | Evaluation of anti-islanding schemes based on nondetection zone concept ![]() |
미소장 |
| 39 | Distributed generation islanding-implications on power system dynamic performance ![]() |
미소장 |
| 40 | Comparative analysis between ROCOF and vector surge relays for distributed generation applications ![]() |
미소장 |
| 41 | Active anti-islanding method for PV system using reactive power control ![]() |
미소장 |
| 42 | Application of distribution line carrier-based protection to prevent DG islanding: an investigating procedure ![]() |
미소장 |
| 43 | p,p′-DDE fails to reduce the competitive reproductive fitness in Nigerian male guppies ![]() |
미소장 |
| 44 | On the local identifiability of load model parameters in measurement-based approach | 소장 |
| 45 | Discrete sliding-mode control of a PWM inverter for sinusoidal output waveform synthesis with optimal sliding curve ![]() |
미소장 |
| 46 | Induction machine parameter identification using PWM inverter at standstill ![]() |
미소장 |
| 47 | Characteristics and modeling of harmonic sources-power electronic devices ![]() |
미소장 |
| 48 | The path of the smart grid ![]() |
미소장 |
| 49 | “Development of Distributed Generation in China,” in proc. of IEEE PES. General Meeting, pp. 1-7, July 2009. | 미소장 |
| 50 | Investigation of Positive Feedback Anti-Islanding Control for Multiple Inverter-Based Distributed Generators ![]() |
미소장 |
| 51 | A $Q$– $f$ Droop Curve for Facilitating Islanding Detection of Inverter-Based Distributed Generation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 52 | Impact of Load Frequency Dependence on the NDZ and Performance of the SFS Islanding Detection Method ![]() |
미소장 |
| 53 | IEEE Recommended Practice for Utility Interface of Photovoltaic (PV) Systems, IEEE Std.929-2000, 2000, pp. 1-26. | 미소장 |
| 54 | IEEE Standard for Interconnecting Distributed Resources With Electric Power Systems, IEEE Std. 1547-2003, 2003, pp. 1-16. | 미소장 |
| 55 | Power Management and Power Flow Control With Back-to-Back Converters in a Utility Connected Microgrid ![]() |
미소장 |
| 56 | Power-Sharing Method of Multiple Distributed Generators Considering Control Modes and Configurations of a Microgrid ![]() |
미소장 |
| 57 | Performance Evaluation of Active Islanding-Detection Algorithms in Distributed-Generation Photovoltaic Systems: Two Inverters Case ![]() |
미소장 |
| 58 | An Islanding Detection Method for a Grid-Connected System Based on the Goertzel Algorithm ![]() |
미소장 |
| 59 | A Correlation-Based Islanding-Detection Method Using Current-Magnitude Disturbance for PV System ![]() |
미소장 |
| 60 | Battery modeling for energy aware system design ![]() |
미소장 |
| 61 | Accurate electrical battery model capable of predicting runtime and I-V performance ![]() |
미소장 |
| 62 | Dynamic Modeling and Control of a Grid-Connected Hybrid Generation System With Versatile Power Transfer ![]() |
미소장 |
| 63 | The application of load models of electric appliances to distribution system analysis ![]() |
미소장 |
| 64 | Load modeling for power flow and transient stability computer studies ![]() |
미소장 |
| 65 | Load modeling of electric locomotive using parameter identification | 소장 |
| 66 | Development of composite load models of power systems using on-line measurement data | 소장 |
| 67 | Reducing Identified Parameters of Measurement-Based Composite Load Model ![]() |
미소장 |
| 68 | Nonlinear dynamic model evaluation from disturbance measurements ![]() |
미소장 |
| 69 | An interim dynamic induction motor model for stability studies in the WSCC ![]() |
미소장 |
| 70 | Composite load modeling via measurement approach ![]() |
미소장 |
| 71 | Measurement-based dynamic load models: derivation, comparison, and validation ![]() |
미소장 |
| 72 | On the parameter estimation and modeling of aggregate power system loads ![]() |
미소장 |
| 73 | Multiple Solutions and Plateau Phenomenon in Measurement-Based Load Model Development: Issues and Suggestions ![]() |
미소장 |
| 74 | A Novel Parameter Identification Approach via Hybrid Learning for Aggregate Load Modeling ![]() |
미소장 |
| 75 | “Numerical Optimization,” 2nd ed., New York: Springer, pp. 258-259, 2006. | 미소장 |
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
| 전화번호 |
|---|
| 기사명 | 저자명 | 페이지 | 원문 | 기사목차 |
|---|
| 번호 | 발행일자 | 권호명 | 제본정보 | 자료실 | 원문 | 신청 페이지 |
|---|
도서위치안내: / 서가번호:
우편복사 목록담기를 완료하였습니다.
*표시는 필수 입력사항입니다.
저장 되었습니다.